@Fil Albuquerque,
Quote: by now sub consciously intuit I got the better of it in that debate.
Sorry, but I havent even been paying attention to you with the exception of taking a word count of "atheist" and then trying to make sense of a somewhat incoherent "argument"..
Intelligent Design (be it theistic, or not) needs to have some established fact to be even mildly attractive as an argument.Right now Its baseless. It IS a fun term because its easy to validate , simply state that some condition applies that precludes naturalism.
Quote: "timeless archetype"
when common phrases are "borrowed" from other disciplines they need to have established a pattern of wider recognition. Sorta like the way the term "taxonomy" has been bandied about as a newer puter term. I find it somewhat tedious when the histories of words and phrases are discounted . Words and phrases have very precise meanings. Glomming them and pasting together to create new, but somewhat vacuous phrases isnt uncommon in these sorts of discussions.
You seem to be easily impressed, I am not.