Intelligent Design Theory: Science or Religion?

I just gave a demo. of how science works you silly old twat. The exercise of the disinterested curiosity.

All you can say is "it isn't". Well it is. So there! Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

The elderly gentleman is being instructed, in words of no syllables, by his bodily organism what not to bother about any more. A form of natural repression serving survival. Pain does a similar thing. Otherwise we would all be black and blue.

Look at how anti-IDers forget the positive aspects of intelligent design and content themselves with impostors of blurts and raspberries to the effect it hasn't any which is mocking the whole human race from first to last from a squirty little ******* keyboard located is some non-descript dump stuck up in a rush on a wilderness. The positive aspects being of no use to them.

His speculations are "out of this world."

Not at all. It is you who are not in it.

Prove it?

No relevance - as usual. Only drunks do this kind of non sequiturs; can't possibly be in any right mind.

You prove I have no idea about science.

How can you be in the real world when you are locked into a world of your own?

You prove it every time you post your opinion about science.

It fitted in with hinge's persistent making a noise to no purpose other than the noise. And Freud, and others, considered infancy as being our basic character formative.

Why do you think I like tits so much?

And I only said "might" anyway.

Another poster's persistence is no excuse for you to follow - unless you're brain dead.

Crusaders are all too apt to be single-minded and to fail to recognise the nuances contained in their ideas and fearful of exploring the limits and the dangers of them.

Take uxoriousness as an example. It is all very well as an idea and as a strategy for being thought Mr Nice Guy in genteel circles but when the nuances of it are explored it can easily become debilitating and thus dangerous.

Scientific materialism partakes of this philosophical weakness.

In both cases it is usually denied that there is anything to explore further than the expression of the ideas. In that sense it is truly "out of this world" as all crusaders, perhaps, need to be.

Even obedience to the law if taken too far can be dangerous.

I found more evidence for my 'moon is possibly made of orange juice' theory:

The Apollo program mission was to go to the moon - and it gave us TANG!

Only after considerable straining to be noticed.

This thread is outside your intelligence parameters hinge. At both ends of the spectrum.

You're a right little lower-middle-class twerp truth to tell. I bet you don't rest your elbows on the table.

Failure to respond to my "crusader" post above is final proof that anti-IDers have been trolling a science forum all along. As I have said many times.

They don't do science at all. They speak its name. They borrow its cachet. They wont recognise the nuances contained in their ideas and they refuse to explore the limits of them. All the while chuntering about peer-reviewing.

They discredit science. They have nothing but dick PR. And are hopeless at that as well.

wake up with a horrid headache again spendi?
You should really entertain abstinence, or at least try a better brand.
Try not to get too angry over things you cannot understand.

Sprung you did I? Here you pop up again with your useless and pointless two-penny worth. The Springfield fully-automatic, high capacity, assertion pop gun.

What do I not understand? That this is just one battle in one campaign on one front in a war?

I wouldn't duck out on having any of my ideas fully explored regarding their limits and dangers as you always do. And with such vulgarity too!!

Why don't you just admit that you can't defend scientific materialism beyond the end of your dick. And SM is what you are promoting.

certainly are in a bad vapor today that you speak so traducingly of me.
The only times I fail to respond to you is when your questions are totally inane. Like who is a "crusader", (or is it, as I suspect, all in your addled neural ganglia)

Just because you ask something doesn't mean its worth a response. A question must first make sense and then be relevant (criteria that you frequently dismiss).Have another few brewskis and maybe youll have an aha moment on all that.

It appears to me that you wish to be the Crusader not anyone else.

Try to keep up

edit

Your the crusader. Like when you went to disrupt a religious meeting. Waving your arms about no doubt and shouting.

My questions are never inane, despite your assertion, and your track record at answering them is D minus.

You either can't answer them or you dare not. If it's the former your credentials are inversely proportional to your deviousness if the latter.

Im certain Ill think all this over.Right now I have an urgent need of a haircut.

Before you embark on that sort of self-pitying whining you ought to try to remember that I have been on my own in this debate and have taken more stick, uncomplainingly, than anybody on A2K has hitherto been subjected to.