0
   

The US, UN & Iraq II

 
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:52 pm
Kara

Before you endorse Tartarin's statement so completely maybe you should ask her for clarification of this sentence:

Some continue to believe quite strongly that 9/11 was an internal affair.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:55 pm
no sweat perception, i would imagine everyone knows i am a strong advocate of civil liberties.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:56 pm
perception, some do still believe quite strongly that it was an internal affair.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:56 pm
Timber wrote:

Get me some coffee while you're up, would ya perc?

Coffee hell---I need a double scotch very little water and no ice.
Care to join me?
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:57 pm
Somebody define "internal affair " for P before there is a gasket blown.

Even I am a bit troubled.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 09:59 pm
LittleK wrote:

<perception, some do still believe quite strongly that it was an internal affair.>

I read that to mean the whole thing was staged by the administration?????
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:00 pm
some believe it was.... some believe that aliens live among us. Some believe that the holocaust never happened.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:05 pm
some actually believe in creationism
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:06 pm
Whoa, there little doggie!

This "administration" couldn't figure out an energy policy for California, who believes they had the brain power (and the hypnotic skills) to get more than a dozen Saudi nationals to fly into the WTC and the Pentagon? Question Question Question Idea Question
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:06 pm
Joe Nation wrote:

Even I am a bit troubled.

Is there any doubt now Joe? Make you feel a bit queasy?
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:08 pm
I'm naturally queasy. Especially around people who think they are always in the right.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:09 pm
Yeah and some don't believe in Free Will so therefore Saddam is not accountable for his actions.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:12 pm
I suppose, from a Jerry Falwell point of view, Saddam's just doing his job.

That's truly scary.
0 Replies
 
littlek
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:13 pm
Hey hello.. I said some people. Criky miky.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:13 pm
I thought Tartarin meant that the terrorist attack was an Al-Qaeda statement against us -- in other words, they have a problem with us and our actions in the world and our alliances and beliefs -- and had nothing to do with any other country.
0 Replies
 
dyslexia
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:14 pm
timber while i can not protest your reference to Falwell i think we are talking more of Jimmy Swaggart
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:15 pm
Hmmm Maybe put a little MORE water in that drink (although I hate to put h20 in perfectly good booze.) I am having a little Maker's Mark neat.

you P are jumping from what I now see as a gaffe in an otherwise solid post by Tar into something else entirely. (I went back and read the whole exchange again. and you say ---- Saddam isn't what???)
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:21 pm
Kara wrote:

< thought Tartarin meant that the terrorist attack was an Al-Qaeda statement against us -- in other words, they have a problem with us and our actions in the world and our alliances and beliefs -- and had nothing to do with any other country.>

Still want to buy into her post lock stock and barrel?
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:26 pm
Joe Nation wrote:

you P are jumping from what I now see as a gaffe in an otherwise solid post by Tar into something else entirely. (I went back and read the whole exchange again. and you say ---- Saddam isn't what???)

What is it that you don't understand?
0 Replies
 
Joe Nation
 
  1  
Reply Thu 3 Apr, 2003 10:26 pm
In a minute I am going to repost it and we will go over it line by line, word by word, maybe then you will see that "internal affair" is just the bone you have decided to chew on all the while ignoring the other points that she made. Is that typical of some kind of thinking?

How about this? We go back on topic.

I'll think of a jumping back on point.

or somebody else can.

The US THE UN AND IRAQ..........
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The US, UN & Iraq II
  3. » Page 142
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 03:22:42