Ketamine wrote:You Americans are very quiet about Israel's blatant breaches of United Nations reolutions.....maybe Timberlandko, you would be man enough to address this issue
OK, I'll tackle that. First, I want to mention I am not in sympathy with either Israel or The Palestinians, and I see no commitment from either to work toward peace. Both are "Part of the problem", neither are "Part of the solution". Some members of this forum no doubt are familiar with my stance on the issue.
This is extemporaneous, but off the top of my head, my take on the matter of Israel and UN Resolutions compared to Iraq UN Resolutions is that any such comparison is baseless. Arab diplomats have tried to manufacture an issue since the runup to Gulf War I, complaining of a "Double Standard" approach on the part of The West in regard to Israel and Iraq.
The effort ignores fundamental differences among the types and intentions of UN Resolutions.
First, there are General Assembly Resolutions, which are essentially nothing more than commentary, non-binding statements indicative of the endorsement by majority vote of The General Assembly of a particular position on a given issue. General Assembly resolutions are recommendations and carry no mandate.
Second are UN Security Council Resolutions, which may, but need not, carry the weight of UN Mandate calling for specific action, and which may establish sanctions or call for other intervention. Two chapters of The UN Charter define the powers of The Security Council and its resolutions. Chapter VI resolutions address "Pacific Resolution of Disputes" and are implemented through a process of negotiation and arbitration among the states party to the dispute and The UN. Chapter VI resolutions are not "Self-Enforcing", and entail settlement reached via good-faith negotiation among the parties to the dispute. As example, UNSCR 242 and UNSCR 338 are Chapter VI resolutions calling for Israeli withdrawl from certain, but not all, territory occupied by Israel following the '67 "Six Day War", by means of a negotiated settlement among Israel and the neighboring Arab States involved in the dispute. No such settlement has ever been agreed upon, so there is nothing which has been "Breached".
By contrast, the resolutions regarding Iraq from 1990 onward specifically ARE Chapter VII Resolutions, contingent not upon negotiated settlement or other form of agreement among or between interested parties, but upon compliance by a particular State with specific terms as spelled out and mandated in the body of the pertinent resolution. Chapter VII resolutions, as provided under Article 42 of The UN Charter, authorize such special military measures as may be appropriate and required to address a State which ignores or otherwise violates a Chapter VII Resolution.
Israel is not in violation of ANY Chapter VII Resolution. Iraq can make no similar claim. Any attempt to found an argument on Comparison of Israel and Iraq is specious.