0
   

The US, UN & Iraq II

 
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:26 pm
http://www.geocities.com/iraqinfo/gallery/auntcries.jpg
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:26 pm
The diplomatic charade is the reason wars are eventually fought---diplomacy almost guarantees zero recourse---very similar to letters between lawyers on the behalf of clients----the typical end result is satisfaction by judge and jury.
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:27 pm
http://www.geocities.com/iraqinfo/gallery/dad-baby.jpg
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:28 pm
http://www.geocities.com/iraqinfo/gallery/mom-baby3.jpg
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:29 pm
Apparently these are our enemies.
0 Replies
 
perception
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:32 pm
Wilso

And you accused the President of not being able to put 4 words together-----you use an X as a sentence but yet Bush is a Moron.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:35 pm
perception wrote:
The diplomatic charade is the reason wars are eventually fought---diplomacy almost guarantees zero recourse---very similar to letters between lawyers on the behalf of clients----the typical end result is satisfaction by judge and jury.
Actually, perc, the overwhelming bulk of litigation is settled before coming before The Bench. Often, accomodation is reached in a bar. More frequently, to be fair, the normal atmosphere and surroundings of discussion are far more staid and correct. That in no way is to be read as an endorsement of either practice.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:42 pm
Perception .....I have to ask, do you find Mr. Bush physically attractive ...... or is it his mind?
0 Replies
 
Wilso
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:42 pm
perception wrote:
Wilso

And you accused the President of not being able to put 4 words together-----you use an X as a sentence but yet Bush is a Moron.


The "X" that you are referring to, is a photograph that your computer is unable to process. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Ketamine
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 08:51 pm
perception wrote:
The diplomatic charade is the reason wars are eventually fought---diplomacy almost guarantees zero recourse---very similar to letters between lawyers on the behalf of clients----the typical end result is satisfaction by judge and jury.

Actually, perc, the overwhelming bulk of litigation is settled before coming before The Bench. Often, accomodation is reached in a bar. More frequently, to be fair, the normal atmosphere and surroundings of discussion are far more staid and correct. That in no way is to be read as an endorsement of either practice.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 09:30 pm
Ketamine, if you're having trouble getting a reply to work the way you want it to, lemme know ... I'd be glad to try to help.
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 09:41 pm
The missile in Kuwait was a Chinese-made Silkworm, a more or less sea-skimming antiship missile which passed under the Patriot's radar. It can be launched from land, though terrain of course is a hinderance. The missile came from somewhere on the Faw Peninsula. Iraq is known to have Silkworms, and likely will egage in further similar improvisation. As the Silkworm is radar guided, the Iraqis may be expected to merely "Point and shoot" as opposed to aiming at and guiding to a specific target. Countermeasures are apparently being implemented.

Dr. Blix has announced his intention to leave his post in June. That development is likely of mere academic interest. I wonder if he'll become a regular TV celebrity; he doesn't seem to be the type to retire.
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:16 pm
Quote:
Have you seen our political links, Kara. It's a virtual reference library. Anyone with a useful link can post here, by the way.


Thanks, Roger. Good stuff.

Gelisgesti, Laughing
0 Replies
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:18 pm
A 4 to 6 day suspension of forward-directed offensive ground action has been announced. It is likely some heavy elements of 4ID can be deployed in that period of time. Consolidation, Force Protection, and inflow of additional assets will be the focus, though air-to-ground activity will remain vigorous. It does appear the assault may have outrun its logistic tail ... lending credence to the argument things were going ahead of schedule. Irregular and paramilitary Iraqi forces may be expected to become bothersome.
4ID's state-of-the-art equipment is a powerful force multiplier, affording significantly greater tactical flexibility and capability than that disposed by 3ID. Of note too is that it is conceiveable that elements of 1ID, currently in Germany, every bit the equal of the already incredibly successful 3ID, could be simultaneously airlifted into at least The Western area, and possibly also The Northern area. Tommy Franks probably really does have a pretty good handle on things. There also is the possibility Saddam may become impatient, and redeploy or otherwise unmask forces, which would simplify the problem of destroying them.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:21 pm
"simplify" - isn't that quite an unstatement timber, kinda like that force that uncovered under the "mask" of the sand storm.

Pure "suicide", if they do!!! Smile
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:24 pm
I wonder what all the bombing, and strafing has already done. But, as we know - don't over estimate destruction or it will cost you dearly. Believe only known decimation, and all the rest treat as if they are still there - then, and only then, proceed! Gotta shore up them supply lines! Two major thrusts and probably a third is long, multiple supply lines!
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:31 pm
I have heard and read that these exhausted troops who are going two-three days without sleep are becoming inefficient. This may account for a 5-6 day slowdown in the onward march.

Timber, if you have back-up info for your strongly held assertions, then I would be happy to read them. Otherwise, I find some of your pronouncements, as are those of Asherman, passionate and sincere statements of what you hope to be the case -- but that are, in the end, just that.
0 Replies
 
Gelisgesti
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:39 pm
Kara, tell me you are not curious .... just a bit
0 Replies
 
Kara
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:47 pm
Whatcha mean, Chief? Curious about what?
0 Replies
 
Ketamine
 
  1  
Reply Fri 28 Mar, 2003 11:50 pm
Over 700 US, British troops killed in Iraq: Envoy

Press Trust of India
Moscow, March 27

Iraq on Thursday claimed that in the US led attack over the country nearly 700 American and British troops have been killed in the past seven days of fighting.

Iraq's Ambassador to Moscow, Abbas Khalaf, quoting fresh reports from Baghdad, claimed that in the last 24 hours alone over 500 American and British troops were killed in fierce fighting in An-Najaf and Kerbala.

Three American spy drones were downed over An-Najaf, he told reporters.

Though it has not been possible to verify the claims of the Iraqi envoy, Khalaf pointed out to the "great difficulties faced by the invading army as US is planning to send up to 30,000 more troops to Iraq as reinforcement."
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » The US, UN & Iraq II
  3. » Page 106
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 10/06/2024 at 10:22:54