No knkock warrant, 6 plain clothes officers, no body cams, upon entry they are set upon by the families dog. Witnesses have testified they heard two loud bangs ("officers" shooting dog with shotgun) followed by small arms shots (Tuttle shooting at invaders).
It wasn't my claim - it was the articles claim that I linked and quoted. I also found several other articles with the same information. I didn't find articles with your claims (and they are currently yours, as you haven't linked the source)
I'm happy for you to post your link to your source.
In any event, as I alluded at the beginning - accidentally shooting a police officer, if they were stupid enough to batter down a door in plain clothes, and not yell 'police' as they did, and even stupider to not yell police when they saw someone, and even more stupid to not yell police when they saw he had a gun, and even more stupid to not yell police when he started firing...sure no problem with that.
It's just not credible that occurred (none of them identifying themselves as police). Each and every one of them would have to be the densest, most tongue tied, piss poorly trained people, with no desire to preserve themselves at all. That's not credible.
Point is - shooting that many police officers is not an accident. Which is why that article is so disgusting. It supports murder.
No police officers were "murdered". Only the couple that lived there and their dog.
Yep, my apologies, read 'shot' wrong at the beginning. Doesn't change the gist of this conversation though. Shooting at police is still trying to kill them. And the story was supporting trying to do so.