0
   

Does Bush's religious faith inappropriately dictatate policy

 
 
timberlandko
 
  1  
Reply Sat 29 Mar, 2003 01:37 pm
I dunno, Frank; New York, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania do seem to have their own concept of the "dignity" of other states ... and vice-versa Twisted Evil
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 12:06 am
WITH GOD ON HIS SIDE
Quote:
Religion in America is much like Nature in the famous saying of Horace: ''Nature, pitchfork it out how you may, keeps tumbling back in on you, slyly overbears your shying from it.'' In the same way, no matter how much Jefferson and Madison tried to pitchfork religion out of official governmental actions, it has kept sneaking back in, beating down attempts to contain it. Madison said that religion is ''not within the cognizance of civil government.'' He did not even want ministers of religion to list their profession in the government's census, since ''the general government is proscribed from interfering, in any manner whatever, in matters respecting religion, and it may be thought to do this in ascertaining who and who are not the ministers of the gospel.''

Madison would be surprised at how much religion gets ''cognized'' in, say, Karl Rove's Rolodex. The nation's executive mansion is currently honeycombed with prayer groups and Bible study cells, like a whited monastery...
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/30/magazine/30THEOCRACY.html
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 09:14 am
Carl Rove is a master spinner - evilly so!
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 09:33 am
A seminal piece (and thanks, bernie, for linking it).

Just have to excerpt my favorite parts:


...[A] nation with no cognizance of religion has no cognizance of God, and without national recognition of his authority, it will not come within His protection. That is not an advantage a country can do without, especially in times of peril. It is unpatriotic to expose the nation to its enemies without taking every measure possible to insure the divine blessing. In the minds of the devout, it is therefore a politically dangerous act to teach ''godless'' evolution in our schools rather than biblical ''creationism.'' It is tempting the divine wrath to let a ''massacre of the innocents'' go forward in abortion clinics. Pornography offends God and therefore forfeits his benevolence. Nor can we be safe from terrorists unless we see that a ''blessed country'' (to use the president's words) must extend God's will of liberty for other countries, by force if necessary....

In [President James] Madison's major statement on the relation of church to state, the ''Memorial and Remonstrance'' of 1785, [he] condemned the use of ''religion as an engine of civil policy.'' The results of this use are ''pride and indolence in the clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity, in both superstition, bigotry, and persecution.'' Disestablishing religion, he argued, does not demote religion but protects it from exploitation by political authority, from ''an unhallowed perversion of the means of salvation.'' The separation of church and state, even though it is constantly being nibbled at, especially in time of war, has been important in keeping America the most religious country in the developed part of the world. As he put it, ''religion flourishes in greater purity without than with the aid of government.''

Madison wielded a pretty good pitchfork, even though religion keeps tumbling back in on us, especially in wartime. The result was measured by Mark Twain when Andrew Carnegie quoted the assertion that America is a Christian country: ''Why, Carnegie, so is hell . . . but we don't brag of this.'' (emphasis mine) Twain's tone deepened in bitterness as he watched America waging another of its pre-emptive wars, this one in the Philippines. He reminded us exactly what we are praying for when we ask God to take sides in war and accomplish the destruction of our foe. His ''War Prayer'' runs, in part:

''O Lord our God, help us to tear their soldiers to bloody shreds with our shells; help us to cover their smiling fields with the pale forms of their patriot dead; help us to drown the thunder of the guns with the shrieks of their wounded, writhing in pain; help us to lay waste their humble homes with a hurricane of fire; . . . help us to turn them out roofless with their little children to wander unfriended the wastes of their desolated land. . . . We ask it, in the spirit of love, of Him Who is the Source of Love.''
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 09:55 am
My God is a loving God, we must pray to the tides of Evil for war. I prefer not to pray to this God!
0 Replies
 
PDiddie
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 10:38 am
Bi-Polar Bear started a thread with this link (at the end) -- excerpt following:

They may be the ones facing danger on the battlefield, but US soldiers in Iraq are being asked to pray for President George W Bush.

Thousands of marines have been given a pamphlet called "A Christian's Duty," a mini prayer book which includes a tear-out section to be mailed to the White House pledging the soldier who sends it in has been praying for Bush.

"I have committed to pray for you, your family, your staff and our troops during this time of uncertainty and tumult. May God's peace be your guide," says the pledge, according to a journalist embedded with coalition forces.

The pamphlet, produced by a group called In Touch Ministries, offers a daily prayer to be made for the US president, a born-again Christian who likes to invoke his God in speeches.

Sunday's is "Pray that the President and his advisers will seek God and his wisdom daily and not rely on their own understanding".

Monday's reads "Pray that the President and his advisers will be strong and courageous to do what is right regardless of critics".(emphasis mine)

They could have stopped at 'right' and not exposed their bias...

US soldiers in Iraq asked to pray for Bush
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 10:45 am
This is the sickness that is crossing the land............if true, it sucks

The military does not exist in individuality, it depends on orders. For the most part, this would be considered an order. If you were seen throwing away the phamplet, you would get laterine duty. There is not much difference in Saddam and Bush!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 11:05 am
A holy war!...gosh, it's been so long since we had one. My teardrop of nostalgia would be more fulsome were it not for the fact that I am also getting daily 'Is Iraq the Beginning of Armageddon?' and "Support our Troops" spam.
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 11:14 am
BillW wrote:
This is the sickness that is crossing the land............if true, it sucks

The military does not exist in individuality, it depends on orders. For the most part, this would be considered an order. If you were seen throwing away the phamplet, you would get laterine duty. There is not much difference in Saddam and Bush!


Bill, that's hyperbole. Biased and BS as the handing out of those pamphlets is, no one throwing such a thing away could be punished for it.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 12:57 pm
In the military they will Snood. Do you believe that they just happened to "be there"? Do you think that there was also a pamphlet that had a pull out tab to send to the President that said, "This war is wrong - Please stop it today!"?

I know not!
0 Replies
 
Vietnamnurse
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 01:24 pm
Bush is perhaps thinking, "God is on OUR Side", but just a few more prayers wouldn't hurt! The Christian Right is behind this, and I find it unsettling.
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 01:47 pm
This is the work of Carl Rove. Direct response and all.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 01:53 pm
Repost from 9 posts ago:

Quote:
Carl Rove is a master spinner - evilly so!
0 Replies
 
snood
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 02:09 pm
BillW wrote:
In the military they will Snood. Do you believe that they just happened to "be there"? Do you think that there was also a pamphlet that had a pull out tab to send to the President that said, "This war is wrong - Please stop it today!"?

I know not!


I'm in the military, Bill. And I don't know when or where you served, but they have little things called the IG office, and the EO office, that wouldn't stand for something as stupid as a soldier being coerced to sign something of a religious nature. I think you're out of touch with reality if you think anything more than some stern looks would happen to me if I threw away a friggin' religious leaflet. Your statement (that you seem to be standing by) that a soldier serving in this war would be punished if he threw something like that away might add some dramatic flair to your argument, but it detracts from your credibility, because I'm sorry - it just ain't so.
0 Replies
 
au1929
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 02:42 pm
I somehow doubt that these pamphlets exist and not just someone's vivid imagination. If they did the press would not have missed the opportunity to publicize there existence. However, if I am wrong they just fortify my fear of the religious right and born again Christians and their encroachment into government.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 03:05 pm
au, you far more express my response than snood's, I simply don't believe they exist; at least I hope so. Maybe the military has become more democratic, but in my days if something was passed out - you responded. It was considered as having come from the highest leadership, an order if you will.

"Get down and give me 50 'cruit, don't you know this mans Army don't waste no valuable paper?"

Yes snood, I did ask for an IG once - and my company was immediately sent back into the field. All the veterans were thankful to me because the field was safer than the rear, at that point! I had been told that in any combat situation a certain number of men are considered expendable and this was in the plan.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 03:12 pm
Good luck snood and have a good man at your back, always! Oh yeah, keep you head low and be the first to respond - Wink
0 Replies
 
Ethel2
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 03:21 pm
BillW,

Yes, Carl Rove is a master spinner, but I was also commenting on the direct response aspect. He's made at least part of his money and reputation as a direct mail businessman in Texas. I know a few things about direct response, well, ok I know a lot about direct response. It may be that the pamphlets don't exist. I don't have time right this minute to look back and see the source. But the fact that the report involves a direct response component lends credibility to me. And I'm very frightened by this report (although it's no more shocking than some other actions that are confirmed) because the method described and the message as reported is state of the art direct response marketing. Everyone complains about junk mail, but it still exists because it is so effective. It's a money maker and a attitude influencer. Those people talented enough to talk people out of their money for a cause, by use of direct response are very good at what they do. Carl Rove is, obviously one of those people. What's dangerous about these people is that they know each other. Have done business with each other and have worked together for some time now to get into positions of power, not only because it makes them feel big, and it makes money, but also because they feel a powerful need to reinforce their own beliefs by forcing it on or selling it to others. There was a link the other day to an article about Tom Hicks and his conglomerate radio stations. These are Texas cronies, including GW. Hicks is the Texas millionaire who bought the Texas Rangers from GW when he was elected governor.

If it's not real, the rumour must have been started by someone who knows a lot about direct mail marketing.
0 Replies
 
BillW
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 03:28 pm
Scary Lola - very scary. And to pick on a soldier in a War Zone. Unabashed, bold faced carpet bagging tactics!
0 Replies
 
Diane
 
  1  
Reply Sun 30 Mar, 2003 03:33 pm
PDiddie posted the link which was from ABC News Online.
An excerpt follows:

Thousands of marines have been given a pamphlet called "A Christian's Duty," a mini prayer book which includes a tear-out section to be mailed to the White House pledging the soldier who sends it in has been praying for Bush.

"I have committed to pray for you, your family, your staff and our troops during this time of uncertainty and tumult. May God's peace be your guide," says the pledge, according to a journalist embedded with coalition forces.

The pamphlet, produced by a group called In Touch Ministries, offers a daily prayer to be made for the US president, a born-again Christian who likes to invoke his God in speeches.

Sunday's is "Pray that the President and his advisers will seek God and his wisdom daily and not rely on their own understanding".

Monday's reads "Pray that the President and his advisers will be strong and courageous to do what is right regardless of critics".
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 01/11/2025 at 09:35:29