@smith7115,
Lots to unpack here. In no particular order:
- Constructive criticism is helpful. This includes giving people an idea of what needs to improve.
- Destructive criticism, where someone is torn down personally or they or their work is made fun of, is not helpful.
- Some people think all criticism is destructive. It's not.
- However, there's nothing wrong with being kind when you criticize. In fact, there is a lot that's right about that. You're still being true to yourself even if you soften the blow.
- And softening the blow is often a far better way to get the person you are critiquing to actually do what you are suggesting.
- As for the way she criticizes, learn to live with that. Her style isn't going to change. You cannot make it change; only she can. Will yours?
A few things. Learn how to soften the blow.
This is by way of what we call in the indie writing community (we get criticisms every day of our lives and we can tell the difference) call the
**** sandwich.
First statement is something that is good. Even lousy writing can be unique. Even slow plots can have interesting characters. Same with any other endeavor.
Second bit is the harsher stuff. But even then, be kind in your criticisms. You're not losing yourself or buttering someone up or being dishonest if you couch more in terms of
I think it would be good if you... versus
You need to.... Because it's ultimately your opinion. It will help a lot if you own up to the fact that hey, you could be wrong. If your critiquing isn't attached to something objective (e. g. that person spelled
decision wrong) and you're not reacting to out-and-out plagiarism, then you're offering your opinion only. Act accordingly. There are probably other ways of doing things that aren't your way.
Third, end on a high note. Again, be kind, be upbeat.
Your friend behaves this way. And it's a far better way to behave. Why? Because just telling unvarnished hard truths is often a cover for just being a jerk. Whereas being kinder, as I noted above, is far more likely to get a behavior changed. And isn't that the name of the game here? Because if it's not, then the critiquing is just bitching.
Do some people need harsh truths only? Maybe. But run it by them first.
Do you want to hear the unvarnished truth? And deal with it if they say no. And if they say yes, you should
still be kind about things. Why? Because these people are presumably your friends so you should not be going around tearing them a new one all the time.
Also, do you do anything that
isn't criticizing? Be honest. Because if all you do is critique, then yeah, people are going to think you're mean. Those are mean behaviors.
You are not the sole guardian of truth and taste.
Is the example she gave overly harsh? Not really, no. But you seem to have put her on the spot to come up with a time when you were overly harsh -- and that in itself is kind of harsh.
So you need to understand when you're being too hard on people and learn how to reel yourself in.
BTW, I don't think she thinks support = agreement at all. Why don't I think this? Because she is saying she's just trying to support you but is having trouble with that, while at the same time agreeing with the essence of your statement. That's not an equivalence.
Finally, I'm going to assume, considering you mentioned a dorm, that you are under the age of 25. Understand that you will change (just like everyone does) and you'll start to get it that there are other ways to be critical.