@maporsche,
maporsche wrote:
georgeob1 wrote:
I wish him well, but recognize that the real driver for his current sales is a A $7,500 Federal subsidy on each vehicle sold ( even more in California). The Federal subsidy expires soon.
You think the person who is willing to spend $50k-$90k on a Tesla is REALLY motivated by the $7500 tax credit?
It appears that Tesla's falling sales and the increasingly desperate Measures Musk is taking to reduce prices (to preserve market share) while at the same time make a profit, confirm that Tesla buyers are indeed motivated by the, now disappearing, tax credit.
Musk is likely a brilliant entrepreneur who was willing to take serious financial risks. His designs for his products were q1uite good, and they are indeed fun to drive ( electric motors are the ultimate torque delivery device). However the unfortunate facts are that , given the initial and replacement costs of the battery, the very long recharge times involved, and the fact that all electric cars (unlike hybrids) are a good deal less thermodynamically efficient than conventional IC engine cars, the market for his vehicles is limited to urban commuters with enough money to pay a premium price.
The expiration of the unwarranted subsidies is a needed recognition that all electric vehicles ultimately lead to more emissions per mile driven than conventional autos.