Do the Dems hate Wall Street?

I believe there is a south American country that serves as the model that the US uses for SSI privatization.

I'll make this short

RexRed wrote:

Increased ownership brings increased competition which leads to a higher standard of social security, greater prosperity, health and economic strength.

How so?

Argentina has privatization.

http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1065&sequence=6

RexRed wrote:

Argentina has privatization.

http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1065&sequence=6

Oh, yeah, and THEY'RE the mirror spittin' image of the U.S....

Einherjar:

Don't even bother. Trust me.

Cycloptichorn

Dookiestix wrote:

RexRed wrote:

Argentina has privatization.

http://www.cbo.gov/showdoc.cfm?index=1065&sequence=6

Oh, yeah, and THEY'RE the mirror spittin' image of the U.S....

So are you saying we cannot learn a thing from Argentina's own experience? And a mass of data from other countries who have attempted other measures. Why? Maybe because their SSI was going or had gone broke too.

Edit: I changed my mind about making this post.

There's no axe; you seem to think that you have me angered somehow.

I'm not mad at you at all. I just don't wish to discuss things with someone who doesn't know what the hell they are talking about. I'm sure you don't feel that you don't know what the hell you are talking about; but you sure haven't displayed that here in any way. Your empty generalities don't do anything than tell people what your opinion is, and frankly, we don't CARE what your opinion is.

Good day.

Cycloptichorn

There's no axe; you seem to think that you have me angered somehow.

I'm not mad at you at all. I just don't wish to discuss things with someone who doesn't know what the hell they are talking about. I'm sure you don't feel that you don't know what the hell you are talking about; but you sure haven't displayed that here in any way. Your empty generalities don't do anything than tell people what your opinion is, and frankly, we don't CARE what your opinion is.

Good day.

Cycloptichorn

Cycloptichorn wrote:

There's no axe; you seem to think that you have me angered somehow.

I'm not mad at you at all. I just don't wish to discuss things with someone who doesn't know what the hell they are talking about. I'm sure you don't feel that you don't know what the hell you are talking about; but you sure haven't displayed that here in any way. Your empty generalities don't do anything than tell people what your opinion is, and frankly, we don't CARE what your opinion is.

Good day.

Cycloptichorn

WE? Who are WE? The third riche?
The difference is, I care what your opinion is but I think it is "incorrect". I am the better for it. Much of what you post is tailored to fit your own ideologue. It is evident, the slander, to those who step back from your obsession and focus to reality for a moment.