Did you know that Cheerios only have one side?
Damned partisan Cheerios. What'sa matta wit them that they gotta vote as a bloc?
farmerman wrote:Did you know that Cheerios only have one side?
Those aren't Cheerios, they're donut seeds.
I thought it was just me.
Then how come there's not a Dunkin Donuts growing out from under my couch?
Ever have sushi and eggs for breqkfast? me neither
One thing is for sure in Costa Rica things are evolving at a fantastic pace.Horses dogs and cats all have magically colored eyes. The Bri Bri Indians all talk of shapeshifters within their own culture. Spiders turn into flying gnats and the bioelectrical energy in the dewy atmosphere is unavoidably present there. You can actually feel it. I was trying to trace atlantis to these people while there and mysterious things happen . I think it's one of the safest places left in the world and alot of new ages are already there.
That's wild. And I'm sure RexRed will say that this somehow proves the existence of God but oh well.
One thing in those articles I didn't comletely agree with is that if there is no observer for an event, the event never happened (something akin to if a tree falls in the forest and there's nobody there to hear it, does it make a sound?). It seems more logical to me that in the lac of an observer, it is impossible to know whether the event happened - you can't say it didn't happen.
I'm obviously not even close to qualified to speak on this subject, but that is my two cents.
Quote:It seems more logical to me that in the lac of an observer, it is impossible to know whether the event happened - you can't say it didn't happen.
Schroedinger's cat would probably agree with you.
Didn't you hear? Schrodinger's cat had kittens the other day, and it's hard to get her to pay attention to anything else. Fear, not, though, we still have Schrodinger's hamster.
Didn't you hear? Schrodinger's cat had kittens the other day, and it's hard to get her to pay attention to anything else. Fear, not, though, we still have Schrodinger's hamster.
Are you sure? Maybe someone should go check on it.
patiodog wrote:Are you sure? Maybe someone should go check on it.
I would, but it looked very tired, and I don't want to force it into an eigenstate.
Fine, I'll take a look. Don't worry, I'll be discrete.
rosborne979 wrote:RexRed wrote:How do you all like my new avatar? I made the boats move ever so slightly... things are not always what they seem...
Whew, I thought I was losing my tolerance for grain alcohol there for a minute.
Did you notice the sailboats moving before I told you?
I swopped the avatar with a GIF I worked on for about an hour about two days ago...
CodeBorg wrote:RexRed,
What did you think of those two articles?
I have a pretty good guess about your thoughts,
and I know what I think about them,
and I can see a train wreck coming here (regarding the difference between
our certainty of measurement - subjective - and what the thing actually is - objective).
But go ahead ... what did you understand the articles to say?
I must admit that my knowledge of physics is so weak that I was not able to really understand what was being said in the articles... but they seem to know what they are talking about...
This site was a bit more my speed...
http://www.aip.org/history/heisenberg/
All matter is made of wave/particles flipping in and out of quantum space... that these experiments went past the logic phase and actually seems to prove this by scientific testing.
farmerman wrote:Ever have sushi and eggs for breqkfast? me neither
I actually prefer pancakes at supper time
farmerman wrote:Did you know that Cheerios only have one side?
The moon has only one side too
It is only there when you can see it...
CodeBorg wrote:RexRed,
What did you think of those two articles?
I have a pretty good guess about your thoughts,
and I know what I think about them,
and I can see a train wreck coming here (regarding the difference between
our certainty of measurement - subjective - and what the thing actually is - objective).
But go ahead ... what did you understand the articles to say?
Is there anyone educated enough in physics to explain these two articles?
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a38b23a55064a.htm
http://www.aip.org/enews/physnews/2003/split/626-1.html
Hey what does everyone think of 60 minutes take on Hobbit man ? The Indonesian half beast that ate everything?
