Evolution? How?

Chum, I think it has a whole lot to do with the individual's environment; culture, family and friends.

Rex wrote:
"How about the fakery of science,..."

And this guy doesn't have any criticism against his comic book, the bible, that's full of errors. omissions and contradctions.

Jeesh! Talk about "fake." LOL

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

cicerone imposter wrote:

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

Brain size...

How about the fakery of science, actually, science is what is strictly "observed"

cicerone imposter wrote:

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

Brain size...

RexRed wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

Brain size...

Brain size, huh? Well, that certainly explains why cetaceans are the dominant species on the planet, followed closely by elephants, with humans and walruses coming in nearly tied at a distant 4th and 5th place, respectively. Good of you to clear that up for us - thanks.

RexRed wrote:

How about the fakery of science, actually, science is what is strictly "observed"

Well there is pseudoscience of which Christian science is but one example, would you not agree?

Chumly wrote:

RexRed wrote:

How about the fakery of science, actually, science is what is strictly "observed"

Well there is pseudoscience of which Christian science is but one example, would you not agree?

Psychoscience... the inability for traditional scientists to perceive change...

RexRed wrote:

Chumly wrote:

RexRed wrote:

How about the fakery of science, actually, science is what is strictly "observed"

Well there is pseudoscience of which Christian science is but one example, would you not agree?

Psychoscience... the inability for traditional scientists to perceive change...

Thus RexRed believes traditional scientists cannot perceive celestial mechanics. You're a wiener who has yet to find the hotdog bun of reason.

Rex,
Your unfounded arrogance pains me. tell me, if you are indeed on another level than us realists, why don't you explain exactly what it is that 'science is missing' and further explain how you know this and what should be done about it.
Since 'science' means 'knowledge', it seems to me that if humanity has been on the wrong track all this time and you can prove it you should do so.

of course, on the otherhand, if you are just another fuzzy minded 'poofist' with no idea why 'science is wrong' other than the fact it isn't congruent with your beliefs, feel free to stay quiet

timberlandko wrote:

RexRed wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

Brain size...

Brain size, huh? Well, that certainly explains why cetaceans are the dominant species on the planet, followed closely by elephants, with humans and walruses coming in nearly tied at a distant 4th and 5th place, respectively. Good of you to clear that up for us - thanks.

Size, density, and complexity?

RexRed wrote:

timberlandko wrote:

RexRed wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

If we were unable to observe our environment, we wouldn't be a member of the animal kingdom. We can only relate to our environment, because of our biology.

Brain size...

Brain size, huh? Well, that certainly explains why cetaceans are the dominant species on the planet, followed closely by elephants, with humans and walruses coming in nearly tied at a distant 4th and 5th place, respectively. Good of you to clear that up for us - thanks.

Size, density, and complexity?

OK guess, but still wrong - by that set of criteria, the Bottlenose Dolphin comes out the winner. Try learning some real science.

Are you saying you would trade your brain for that of a dolphin? Hehe size is not always perimeter and diameter...