RexRed wrote:I think that reality has to be legitimate.
Indeed, though rather redundant.
Quote: It is based upon laws and these laws are so absolute and they have been in place since the beginning thus having not been breached once.
To the best of our knowledge, the laws we know appear to have held constant, however, that merely is to the best of our knowledge, and our knowledge by no means encompasses all laws. We've barely gotten a handle on non-Euclidian geometry, and quantum mechanics is absolutely full of puzzles, questions, and surprises, some of which appear to be inconvenient to, sometimes even contrary to, long accepted concepts of "established. laws". Thats the wonder - and the purpose - of science; see what works and find out why.
Quote:If the laws that caused life on earth had one single flaw then the outcome would have been disastrous and not what it is today. That means an infinity of parameters were set in the beginning and not one single one has ever failed.
Poppycock - you only assume the alternative would be disaster; it might or might not have come out differently had things been different, but within our sphere of reference and experience we can draw only on what has come about. Perhaps things would somehow be better, perhaps somehow worse, perhaps different, perhaps the same, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps ad inifitum, ad nauseam. We don't know, because what we know is that derived from what we observe. Indeed, the parameters for that which we experience were set at the emegence of the singularity - the Big Bang - and the entirity of what and where and when we are is a natural consequence of that event. The math, physics, astronomy, geology, paleontology, archaeology, biology, and pristine, uncluttered, yet elegant logic permit no other forensically valid, academically sound, intellectually honest answer. All else is nought but blind, unfounded conjecture, and when wrapped in superstition, blind, unfounded conjecture becomes religion. Perhaps we are what and where and when we are precisely because of as yet undiscovered flaws in the laws we think we know, or at least as we currently understand those laws ... perhaps, if there are flaws, they're not in the laws, but in our understanding. But then, all that talk about possible flaws in laws is just blind, unfounded conjecture, though since it is unencumbered by superstitionn, at least it escapes devolving into mere religion.
Quote:There are millions and millions of bytes that load up into the ram of your computer each time you turn it on and if even one single bit of a byte did not read right the computer would not start and run properly.
You have a bit to learn about the way computers work. Look into boolean matrices, error correction and parity.
Quote:Once the computer is up and running then it has full functionality... God is the programmer...
That certainly could explain the errors, bugs, flaws, crashes, and assorted other inconveniences and unpleasantries of the life experience ... the more elaborate the code, the more opportunity for screwups;l ook at Windows, for instance.
Hmmmmmm .... Bill Gates as god ... well, no more or less improbable than some other candidates, many of which already are accorded the title, deserving or not, extant or not.
You're killin' me. 