Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 01:45 pm
A form of life is theoretically possible on another planet that is based on another element besides nitrogen. Inorganic matter such as rocks would not change their characteristics. They are only related in an abstract sense.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 01:59 pm
aperson wrote:
aperson wrote:
real life wrote:
aperson wrote:
The answer to this topic seems simple to me. How come, even when stacks of evidence are piled up infront of them, some stubborn people still refuse to believe. Like I said earlier, you can believe in God and evolution. Is it possible that Genesis' description of the creation of Earth is metaphorical?


It is possible. I don't think it likely.

Even if it were, that doesn't answer the 'how' of evolution, which is the topic.

Simply stating that something evolved doesn't explain how it did.

Evolution, as stated in my post to Ros, seems to me to be filled with lots of contradictory assumptions.

If you believe that evolution is the process by which life on Earth got to the stage we see it in today, then perhaps you'd like to address the question I asked Ros about.

Most evolutionists, in their more candid moments, will tell you they don't know for sure a lot of the 'hows' of evolution. But they are just sure it happened.

It's a strange position when you think about it.


The "how" of evolution??? Isn't this simple??? Surely educated persons would know this? Please describe the "what" of the "how" we are discussing.


Could someone answer my question?

Living rocks? I don't tiiiiiiink sooooo.


How are you so sure that atoms are not alive.. they move around. Rocks don't move around in our sphere but they are full of movement within that we cannot see.

Even carbon is made from moving things. Water has movement within it.

Plants don't move much but we still consider them alive...

Where are plants brains? Who is to say a plant is not self aware simply because it has atoms in a certain formation that give it awareness.

Less complex creatures may have developed other senses that we are unaware of.

Why don't we only have four senses? Why five? Could there be six and seven senses? We know that DNA is one of the most powerful "computers" known to man? Even today DNA is being used to compute some of the most complex answers ever questioned.

We know that atoms can form into arrays that can hold binary information..

The fact that rocks are "alive" is not a theory it is proven by modern computer science...

It is human intelligence that is truly artificial... Smile
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:05 pm
Plants "move" by running root systems making bamboo one of the faster plants. Where is there any empirical evidence through "computer science" that rocks are alive? I did not put that in quotes because now you are playing silly semantic games. Hayakawa is going to strike you down with lightning.
0 Replies
 
aperson
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:11 pm
As for the living rocks theory, the bacteria feed on the nutrients and minerals on the rocks. Feeding is essentially the passing on of energy. Living things require energy to live. Bacteria can't survive on the minerals alone.

In order for a thing to pass as living, it must have 7 characteristics:

M ovement
R espiration
S ensitivity
G rowth
R eproduction
E xcretion
N utrition

This is why rocks don't pass as living, as they have none of these. This is also why viruses don't pass as living, as they only do one of these things - reproduction - and even then they can't do this without the presence of another cell. Plants are classed as living:

M ovement - move towards the sun
R espiration - breathe in air, let out oxygen
S ensitivity - sensitive to gravity (growing upwards) and light (turn to face the sun)
G rowth - obviously
R eproduction - obviously
E xcretion - dead leaves drop off
N utrition - absorbing nutrients from the ground

Note:
Plants don't get energy from other organisms, they make it (photosynthesis) and this requires energy from the sun.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:38 pm
aperson wrote:
As for the living rocks theory, the bacteria feed on the nutrients and minerals on the rocks. Feeding is essentially the passing on of energy. Living things require energy to live. Bacteria can't survive on the minerals alone.

In order for a thing to pass as living, it must have 7 characteristics:

M ovement
R espiration
S ensitivity
G rowth
R eproduction
E xcretion
N utrition

This is why rocks don't pass as living, as they have none of these. This is also why viruses don't pass as living, as they only do one of these things - reproduction - and even then they can't do this without the presence of another cell. Plants are classed as living:

M ovement - move towards the sun
R espiration - breathe in air, let out oxygen
S ensitivity - sensitive to gravity (growing upwards) and light (turn to face the sun)
G rowth - obviously
R eproduction - obviously
E xcretion - dead leaves drop off
N utrition - absorbing nutrients from the ground

Note:
Plants don't get energy from other organisms, they make it (photosynthesis) and this requires energy from the sun.


Thanks for this detailed clinical definition for life...

see I think rocks have all of these characteristics...

M ovement
R espiration
S ensitivity
G rowth
R eproduction
E xcretion
N utrition

What do you think a sun or volcano is? They reproduce rocks...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:51 pm
What does a rock eat?

If I am not mistaken rocks eat electrons..

I seem to remember solids attract electrons as gasses expel them.

Yet solids still can expel electrons too.

Rocks are attracted to the sun by gravity... That is why our earth circles the sun...

Rocks "grow", are fused with other rocks and are nourished as new electrons are added.

It is only human ego that diminishes the "life" within the world around us...
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:52 pm
So far Timber has answered my question the most detailed, and then a few others helped.

But I still would like to know where these homo-eructus came from? Were they here many many years after this organic soup started spittin' out creature-like fish and evolving?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:53 pm
Rocks move by gravity which is something inherent within them (legs)...
0 Replies
 
Im the other one
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:57 pm
So, that spider I squished lastnight may have been a rock instead? Shocked

Very Happy
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 02:59 pm
There is a chemistry between rocks and if you put the right two rocks together in the right way they will make more rocks...
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 03:07 pm
Rocks can bleed and die...

Have you ever seen copper exposed to heat?

Oil is a form of rock... when we burn it it dies and is gone forever...

Ethanol is the plant form of crude oil...

These two root substances ethanol/petroleum are nearly identical.

One comes from rock and the other from corn by way of the sun...
0 Replies
 
aperson
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 03:17 pm
This is ridiculous. Rocks move around the sun because gravity makes them. Are we saying that everything that is affected by gravity is alive??? Any biologist will tell you ROCKS ARE NOT ALIVE. And rocks joining together is not reproduction. It is simply rocks joining together. Rocks only move because other things move them. When I said movement I ment by itself. I mean, we could just go ahead and say everything is alive, but we don't.

I suggest we move on and stop dicussing this.
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 03:24 pm
aperson wrote:
This is ridiculous. Rocks move around the sun because gravity makes them. Are we saying that everything that is affected by gravity is alive??? Any biologist will tell you ROCKS ARE NOT ALIVE. And rocks joining together is not reproduction. It is simply rocks joining together. Rocks only move because other things move them. When I said movement I ment by itself. I mean, we could just go ahead and say everything is alive, but we don't.

I suggest we move on and stop dicussing this.


I did not say that rocks are alive because they join together...

You did...

And biologists know exactly what life is?

They have test tubes containing pure life essence and analyze it in their labs?
0 Replies
 
RexRed
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 03:28 pm
What is DNA but a clever pattern created by monoliths and chemistry...
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 03:33 pm
What is Rex drinking, popping or smoking today? I want some of it.
0 Replies
 
aperson
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 07:24 pm
RexRed wrote:
aperson wrote:
This is ridiculous. Rocks move around the sun because gravity makes them. Are we saying that everything that is affected by gravity is alive??? Any biologist will tell you ROCKS ARE NOT ALIVE. And rocks joining together is not reproduction. It is simply rocks joining together. Rocks only move because other things move them. When I said movement I ment by itself. I mean, we could just go ahead and say everything is alive, but we don't.

I suggest we move on and stop dicussing this.


I did not say that rocks are alive because they join together...

You did...

And biologists know exactly what life is?

They have test tubes containing pure life essence and analyze it in their labs?


Well they certainly know a big deal more than some people here do.

You're simply basing your opinions on intuition, not reasoning and logic. A rock does not have ANY of the 7 characteristics required for life. Can a rock move on its own? No. Can a rock respire? No. Can a rock sense things and react accordingly? No. Can a rock grow? No. Can a rock create other rocks? No. Can a rock excrete matter? No. If a rock is living then does it require nutrients to live? No.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 08:11 pm
A rock is inorganic. Period.
0 Replies
 
rosborne979
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 08:20 pm
RexRed wrote:
Rocks move by gravity which is something inherent within them (legs)...


How do you manage to feed yourself in the morning. Do you have help?
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 09:43 pm
I'm the other one wrote:
So far Timber has answered my question the most detailed, and then a few others helped.

But I still would like to know where these homo-eructus came from? Were they here many many years after this organic soup started spittin' out creature-like fish and evolving?



http://www.archaeologyinfo.com/species.htm

P
0 Replies
 
Pauligirl
 
  1  
Reply Sun 9 Apr, 2006 09:45 pm
rosborne979 wrote:
Listen to this:

Dr.Whacko wrote:

We are not looking to do anything illegal. Ever since 1999, when this property was given to the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ, we have not knowingly submitted God's church to any lesser authority. Our decision to build without permits from the county was based on our understanding of the Bible and, to a lesser degree, the constitutions of the united States and the State of Florida.


Big mistake. But I'm sure it's not their last.


http://www.blessedquietness.com/journal/housechu/hovind.htm
It's not just the park and permits, it's also taxes, bankruptcy and the IRS

P
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

 
  1. Forums
  2. » Evolution? How?
  3. » Page 437
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.4 seconds on 11/15/2024 at 03:56:59