Evolution? How?

real life wrote:

Therefore neither one of us, nor anyone you can point out, has ever observed one critter, which is now fossilized, evolve into another.

Good thinking; a dead and fossilized critter stays dead and fossilized.

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

It's all a matter of the mind.......I think? lol

I think you mean 'A waist is a terrible thing to mind'

not when it's a size 28.....but yes....mine is.

I haven't seen 28 since 26, bro.

talking on these forums ain't helping nuttin you know. lol

Bartikus wrote:

cicerone imposter wrote:

Bartikus, I know you're just teasing, but to answer your question, just go back and read all the responses by rl to answers provided by "everybody else" about evolution and science.

If that isn't "calcified," I don't know what other definition would fit.

If I agreed it would only be my shared opinion at best.

I have learned that typing one's thoughts is not the best way of communicating. Too many possibilities of misunderstanding each other.

I once had a conversation with a good friend of mine over im and it erupted into a bitter dispute that lasted over a year.

It was nothing but a misunderstanding.

We are all limited somewhat by our written use of the english language....some more than others I admit.

There are times when my use of the english language is inadequate to relay my true thoughts. I suppose that would be true of almost anyone at times.

Two psychiatrists passed each other in the hallway.

"Good Morning" said the first.

The other said, "I wonder what he meant by that?"

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

It's all a matter of the mind.......I think? lol

I think you mean 'A waist is a terrible thing to mind'

not when it's a size 28.....but yes....mine is.

I haven't seen 28 since 26, bro.

talking on these forums ain't helping nuttin you know. lol

what are you incinerating?

Bartikus, I know you're just teasing, but to answer your question, just go back and read all the responses by rl to answers provided by "everybody else" about evolution and science.

If that isn't "calcified," I don't know what other definition would fit.

Barticus, I believe the majority of us do not communicate our thinking on paper correctly 100 percent of the time. Mistakes are made by humans every day. I think most of us are able to overlook those occasional mistakes, but consistent rhetoric about a position in politics or religion that has no basis of fact can be identified for what it is.

rl defends his position that there is no proof of evolution by saying nobody has seen any animal become fossilized from one critter into another, and therefore evolution is only a theory, ignoring what happens to virus in today's world, and the overwhelming support for evolution by biologists.

He also misinterprets why scientists make assumptions about how animals evolved from fossils found from different periods and places on this planet, but never provides why their theories are wrong. Without defending his position with details of specific assumptions made by scientists, his is a oversweeping denial of scientific findings in the many fields of science that supports evolution.

rl would look ignorant trying to defend his position with a high school biology student.

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

It's all a matter of the mind.......I think? lol

I think you mean 'A waist is a terrible thing to mind'

not when it's a size 28.....but yes....mine is.

I haven't seen 28 since 26, bro.

talking on these forums ain't helping nuttin you know. lol

what are you incinerating?

huh? oh insinuating?......uh that people who sit gives into gravity instead of resisting and thereby all the fatness settles around the waist. I think. better to lay down maybe. lol

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

real life wrote:

Bartikus wrote:

It's all a matter of the mind.......I think? lol

I think you mean 'A waist is a terrible thing to mind'

not when it's a size 28.....but yes....mine is.

I haven't seen 28 since 26, bro.

talking on these forums ain't helping nuttin you know. lol

what are you incinerating?

huh? oh insinuating?......uh that people who sit gives into gravity instead of resisting and thereby all the fatness settles around the waist. I think. better to lay down maybe. lol

so you're saying I should change my fatitude?

It depends on one's religious beliefs.

It depends on one's religious beliefs.

Is evolution a proven fact then?

I challenge anyone to propose an alternate theory that fits the facts.

......... posing the specious and wholly absurd objection that there is any functional difference between what they disingenuously, if not consciously, deviously, dishonestly term "micro-evolution" and "macro-evolution" - a weasle/waffle they came up with when it became impossible for them to deny evolution is observable and is being observed.

What does creation not fit with? Get specific.

real life wrote:

What does creation not fit with? Get specific.

Here we go again fooling around with semantics!

Christian Creationism is not a theory as per "a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena that have been repeatedly tested and widely accepted and can be used to make predictions."

I challenge you to prove Christian Creationism is a set of statements or principles devised to explain a group of facts or phenomena that have been repeatedly tested and widely accepted and can be used to make predictions.