Jackofalltrades wrote:When an amimal dies shouldn't the soft tissue rot away or be eaten by bugs or if underwater by underwater scavengers?
Generally this is true, but it depends on how the creature died. There are cases (in china for example) where animals have been trapped in quick mudslides and preserved in dynamic detail (in particluar, there are good specimens of raptors actually attacking some small plant eaters. I don't have the details on this handy, but I could probably find them on Google if you are really interested).
There are also flash flood events (which have nothing to do with Noah's flood
)
Jackofalltrades wrote:How could these soft tissues be preserved unless there was a rapid deposit (read flood) of sediment to seal the critter?
Flash floods and mud slides do happen (even today in California we see mud slides) and we see evidence or them in prehistoric times. Luckily (for us) animals got caught in these events and were preserved in more detail than is otherwise normal.
I know that Creationists like to think that all sudden mud slides and floods are evidence for Noah's flood, but an array of evidence just doesn't support this, and instead gives us detailed information on past geologic and environmental conditions.
I have to say that if someone refuses to admit that the Earth is any older than 4000 years, then any discussion of scientic reasoning pretty much has to stop there. It's a waste to try to discuss "evidence" and "research" when someone is not willing to accept the basic premis that science is capable of understanding the basic ages of rocks and geological formations.