Intrepid wrote:You are wrong, Frank. You used the word hypocrite NOT hypocrites. I responded with 3 uses of the word hypocrite in the New Testament. You came us with more using the plural..hypocrites. That is not what you said the first time. Of course, that would make me wrong, wouldn't it.
I was wondering if you would stoop low enough to use that argument. I actually removed a reference to it before posting one of my responses...just to see if you would do it. I was hoping you would not...but suspected you would.
Of course, I was hoping earlier when I questioned your supposed knowledge that there is a God...you would simply acknowledge that you did not know...and move on.
You are a huge disappointment.
Of course, Jesus, when speaking to (or of) one person used one form of the word and when speaking to (or of) several...used the other.
And you want to consider me "wrong" because you were not smart enough to do the search you did using both forms of the word!!!
How sad! I pity you.
Quote:It is not being right or wrong, Frank. That is your world.
If you would stoop to that silly argument about singular and plural...it obviously is about being right or wrong with you, Intrepid.
You are a sad, sad case.
Quote:Frank, perhaps it is time that you became a man instead of suggesting that of others. Integrity???? hmmmm
Both apply to you as I have suggested. You are a sad, sad case.
Quote:If responding to your nonsense is being nasty... guilty as charged.
In this case...you may substitute the word "petty" for nasty.
And you are guilty as charged.
