coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:06 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
It’s called “empathy.”

It is called cheating.
maporsche
 
  3  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:08 pm
@coldjoint,
No. I think it’s called “wasting my time”
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:19 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
No. I think it’s called “wasting my time”

I wouldn't say that, I am sure others believe those numbers would change an election because they have been told that. How many people who are here legally do not have a photo ID? Do you have any idea?

It is all a scheme for illegal votes that the Democrats clearly need.
maporsche
 
  5  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:27 pm
@coldjoint,
How many homeless, poor, elderly, American citizens should have their civil rights removed/restricted in order to stop some so-tiny-voter-fraud-numbers-that’s-they-are-laughable?

It’s estimated that 3 million citizens don’t have an ID for various reasons. I don’t know how many of them want to vote but that’s kinda inconsequential right? I mean if the 2nd amendment folks have taught me anything it’s that taking the rights away from even a single American isn’t worth the cost, no matter how many lives may be saved.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:30 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
It’s estimated that 3 million citizens don’t have an ID for various reasons.

Source that. I can hardly wait.
maporsche
 
  4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:36 pm
@coldjoint,
coldjoint wrote:

Quote:
It’s estimated that 3 million citizens don’t have an ID for various reasons.

Source that. I can hardly wait.


I googled it for you, and found out that I may have been way off (underestimating). I was using a number that I remembered from college.

Not that you’ll read this, but here you go.

https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/legacy/d/download_file_39242.pdf


I’m 100% positive that your gut reaction will be “fake!!!” and maybe 2% positive that you’ll counter with a study that says much different (there’s a +\- 2% margin of error in that last number).
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 03:50 pm
WikiLeaks:
https://scontent.fhou1-2.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/44588078_1872471589454611_2008261449876504576_n.jpg?_nc_cat=102&_nc_ht=scontent.fhou1-2.fna&oh=7a8f5cdc73daaa5ec4eb77fec949bacb&oe=5C8ACF62
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:01 pm
@maporsche,
Quote:
I’m 100% positive that your gut reaction will be “fake!!!”

Those people do not care if they vote or not. You wish to facilitate voter fraud.
maporsche
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:07 pm
@coldjoint,
[lowers head in disappointment]
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:10 pm
I don't know why people provide sources just because CJ demands it. The only sources he ever provides are from far right-wing web sites, who don't themselves provide sources for their claims. My advice is to ignore him.
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:12 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
My advice is to ignore him.


Since when have we taken each other’s advice?
farmerman
 
  4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:13 pm
@Setanta,
Today the "Democratic Socialists" announced their platform and candidtes for the mid terms.
Their chosen name is kinda sending a message that"we aint as zany as we sound". sorta like "Compassionate Conservatism"
0 Replies
 
maporsche
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:14 pm
@maporsche,
Sorry. That’s kinda catty.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 04:51 pm
@Setanta,
Quote:
I don't know why people provide sources just because CJ demands it.

This is a forum, no one demands anything. If they think they do, I say good luck with that.
0 Replies
 
Setanta
 
  1  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 05:09 pm
@maporsche,
No sweat, none of us are obliged to follow the advice of others. We all offer our advice, which is worth exactly as much as you paid for it.
0 Replies
 
RABEL222
 
  2  
Reply Mon 22 Oct, 2018 05:15 pm
@edgarblythe,
Good idea. Maybe we could include the Russian, Turkish, and the Israeli assinations also.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2018 07:17 am
Quote:
10,000 Missouri voters received Republican mailers with false voting information

The GOP says the whole thing was the result of a "miscommunication" with the printer.

Some 10,000 voters in Missouri received mailers with incorrect information about the dates for their absentee ballots were due. The source? The Missouri Republican Party.


More at TP
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2018 09:39 am
How the media makes the country dumber
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2018 09:42 pm
@Setanta,
Setanta wrote:
I don't know why people provide sources just because CJ demands it.
Because if they don't provide cites upon request, that is evidence that their claims are untrue.
Setanta
 
  3  
Reply Tue 23 Oct, 2018 11:57 pm
@oralloy,
Ah, just like all the bullsh*t you peddle for which you never provide sources. So by your own criterion, your stories are untrue.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Progressives (Liberals)
  3. » Page 57
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.1 seconds on 04/24/2024 at 04:55:22
▲ ▼