revelette1
 
  2  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2018 09:19 am
Quote:
Washington (CNN)Clashes over voting rights in two states this past week have renewed focus on the issue less than four weeks from the midterm elections.

In Georgia, a coalition of civil rights groups is suing Republican Secretary of State Brian Kemp after an Associated Press report found 53,000 people -- nearly 70% of them black -- had their registrations put on hold because minor mismatches on documents like their driver's licenses violate the state's new "exact match" requirement. Kemp's office says voters who have pending registrations will still be able to vote on November 6.

Kemp is running for governor against Democratic nominee Stacey Abrams, who is seeking to become the nation's first black female governor. The Abrams campaign has called on Kemp to resign his position as secretary of state.

"When you know that what you are doing is going to have a disproportionate affect on people of color and on women and you do it anyway, that erodes the public trust in the system and that's problematic," Abrams told CNN's Jake Tapper during an appearance on "State of the Union" Sunday.

In North Dakota, meanwhile, Native American tribes, who largely vote for Democrats, are confronting the implementation of a law that requires voters to provide a form of identification that includes their legal name, current street address and date of birth. The problem, for some Native Americans, is the street address requirement. Native Americans who live on reservations or in rural areas that lack street addresses often instead use P.O. boxes.

The two states are the latest examples in a wave of battles over restrictive voting measures passed in largely Republican-dominated states in the name of preventing voter fraud. The trend began after the GOP wave of 2010 and picked up steam after the Supreme Court's 2013 decision that gutted major provisions of the Voting Rights Act. The laws -- typically imposing strict identification requirements at the ballot box, or limiting early and absentee voting -- have led to a crush of legal and political battles, over measures like a voter ID law in Texas and early voting restrictions in North Carolina.

Democratic-controlled states, particularly northeastern states like New York and Massachusetts, have their own arcane voter laws. But nationally, Democrats have in recent years begun advocating dramatic expansions of voting access -- including automatic voter registration. The party has also taken a much more aggressive approach to combatting what it sees as GOP state policies that disproportionately affect Democratic-leaning constituencies.

It's become a flashpoint for the party's base, which is paying more attention to the nuts-and-bolts details of elections and governance than ever before, Democratic officials said.

"People are responding to the idea -- they don't like that culture of corruption. They don't like the idea that someone is preventing their voice from being heard," said DNC spokeswoman Sabrina Singh.

The Democratic focus on voting access increased after Hillary Clinton's loss in 2016. Without the White House, the party's loss of nearly all other levers of power on the federal and state levels was laid bare.

In the wake of the election, Priorities USA, the largest Democratic super PAC, announced a new focus on voter protections, bringing onto the group's board Marc Elias, the Democratic lawyer who leads most of the party's legal battles against restrictive voting laws.

Former attorney general Eric Holder launched the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, aimed at helping the party win majorities in state houses and senate ahead of the 2020 redistricting process. Doing so would also give the party a way of blocking new, restrictive voting laws.

And former Missouri secretary of state Jason Kander launched Let America Vote, a political action committee that battles what the group sees as GOP voter suppression efforts. Kander, a military veteran, recently stepped back from the group as he battles post-traumatic stress disorder.

At the Democratic National Committee, chairman Tom Perez expanded the party's voter protection team -- launching a 24/7 hotline and putting together toolkits for specific populations, including African-Americans, Latinos, Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders, and LGBTQ individuals -- particularly transgender people -- that address specific hurdles they are most likely to encounter at the ballot box.

The efforts come ahead of a midterm election when the Democratic base is eager to deliver a rebuke of President Donald Trump's first two years in office. Democrats expect young and first-time voters, many of them minorities, to turn out at higher rates than they have in recent midterms.

Taken together, the state laws and GOP officials' actions show Republicans are trying to "rig elections," said Let America Vote board chairman Abe Rakov. Republicans counter that they are trying to secure the vote.

Republican state officials were emboldened, Rakov said, "when the President lied about all the illegal voters" in 2016's presidential election. Trump falsely claimed that millions of illegal votes were cast, despite there being no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

"That lie laid the political groundwork for Republicans to think they had the political cover to do this," Rakov said.

He pointed to Missouri, where a judge recently blocked the enforcement of a portion of the state's voter identification law that requires those lacking photo IDs to present another form of identification and sign a sworn statement.

Missouri Attorney General Josh Hawley, the Republican challenging Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill, is appealing the ruling on the state's behalf. And GOP secretary of state Jay Ashcroft told reporters the ruling created "mass confusion" because it's local authorities -- rather than the state, which the judge's ruling addressed -- that enforce the law.

Rakov also complained that Iowa's secretary of state was slow to release early voting data that shows who already cast their ballots -- an important piece of information for campaigns trying to determine who they still need to target.

n Indiana, a judge blocked Republican secretary of state Connie Lawson's plan to purge 450,000 people from the state's voter rolls ahead of the midterms.

"They're clearly very scared this cycle, more than they have been in the past, and they think voters aren't with them -- so they've become anti-voter," Rakov said.



CNN

As 2016 election showed us, elections have consequences, this midterm election is very important. We need to get as many local and state democrats elected as possible and all the democrats (whether progressive or otherwise) running for congress elected as well. It is these elected offices who chose judges which judges, or in the case of our present Supreme Court dismisses, voting rights issues.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Wed 17 Oct, 2018 05:09 pm
Assuming the blue wave is for real, the Democrats will have just enough time to build a record of attempting to actually do things for those who elected them. The consequences of settling for the status quo: another four years of All Trump All the Time.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 07:54 am
Edit: I just saw this headline:
Turkish media claims Saudi suspect in alleged Jamal Khashoggi killing has died after ‘suspicious traffic accident’



http://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2018/10/a-million-ordinary-dead-people-is.html

A MILLION ORDINARY DEAD PEOPLE IS A STATISTIC, BUT THE DEATH OF ONE OF US IS A TRAGEDY
To explain why the death of Jamal Khashoggi has inspired much greater outrage than, say, the cruelties of the war in Yemen, Max Fisher of The New York Times turns to a familiar quote attributed to Stalin:
Any reporter who has covered a humanitarian disaster should understand what Stalin is once reported to have said to a fellow Soviet official: The death of one person is a tragedy, but the death of one million is a statistic.

... It is not easy to wrap one’s mind around thousands of deaths. It becomes an abstraction of geopolitics, economics, conflict dynamics — of statistics.

But a single death can be understood in the more relatable terms of, say, a grieving father or a desperate spouse. Or a murdered journalist, like Mr. Khashoggi.
Yes, but if one death is a tragedy, why did the media single this one out? I think the answer is obvious: The elite media focused on Khashoggi because he's one of their own, not just a columnist but a columnist for one of America's prestige newspapers. I'm not sure the broad general public was clamoring for saturation coverage of this story -- it was a choice made by editors in American journalism's upper reaches because it involved a colleague. The general public might be interested now because the specifics of the assassination are so gruesome and lurid. But even now I don't think the story matters as much to the average American as it does to the press.

I also suspect that, for the press, Mohammed bin Salman is serving as a proxy for President Trump -- not just because the Trump family has significant ties to Saudi Arabia, but because Trump is waging a war on the press in America. I think many journalists have been expecting Trump's anti-media campaign to turn violent, whether at the hands of one of his supporters or -- although this still seems like a line Trump won't cross yet -- in the form of a campaign of physical intimidation launched from the White House. In America we're not there yet, but here's a head of state who's a Trump crony killing a journalist who was a U.S. resident. That's close.

It's good that we're paying attention to this story. It's causing America to question the usual U.S. deference to the Saudis. Also, it might be drawing more attention to the corruption of the Trump family. (However, I think most ordinary Americans believe that every plutocrat does dodgy things, and, really, how can you not when the laws are so complicated and everyone else you're dealing with has dubious morals? That's why I think the big New York Times story about Trump's money was a dud -- that and the fact that the dodges and ruses described in the story were complex and difficult to understand.)

I'd like this story to matter. To most Americans, I don't think it will. I think in the end we'll be pretty much where we were in relation to the Saudis, and the public still won't care much about that or about Trump family corruption. But I could be wrong, and it's worth pursuing the story, even if journalists care mostly because one of their own was the target.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 12:25 pm
Why Democrats Could Lose in a Texas Congressional District That’s 70 Percent Latino
https://www.texasobserver.org/why-democrats-could-lose-in-a-texas-congressional-district-thats-70-percent-latino/
The 23rd Congressional District is Texas’ one true swing district. It forms a claw that holds on to the heart of San Antonio and then stretches west all along the border to El Paso County. It’s a gigantic district, encompassing two time zones as well as about two-thirds of the Texas-Mexico border, and it’s more than 70 percent Latino.

If a backlash to Trump — the president who demonizes Mexican Americans, separates children from their parents at the border and obsesses about building a border wall — were to materialize anywhere, you would think it would be here.

But in Texas, perennial concerns about low Latino turnout are again rearing their head. “If you were banking on the Bexar County Democratic Party to carry a heavy share of the load [in the 23rd], you probably want to rethink your plan,” Mark Jones, a Rice University political science professor, warned.

Instead, Democrats are counting more on the resistance — and their path to a House takeover — to run through the oak-lined boulevards of Bellaire and West University Place in Houston’s 7th Congressional District and Highland Park in Dallas’ 32nd Congressional District. There, they think they can flip moderate Republicans and independents who are highly likely to vote. They’re counting less on turning out unlikely Democratic voters in the Latino neighborhoods of south and west San Antonio and El Paso’s Lower Valley, or the struggling border towns of Eagle Pass, Del Rio and Presidio.


Latino turnout rates in the 23rd have long been anemic, especially in midterm years. In Bexar County, just over 30 percent of registered voters went to the polls in 2014; the rates are often worse in the district’s border counties.

The current congressman, Will Hurd, has effectively sold himself as a Republican maverick — despite voting with Trump more than 95 percent of the time. He travels the district, holding town halls in local Dairy Queens, and it probably doesn’t hurt that he’s good friends with Democratic darling Beto O’Rourke, who has refused to weigh in on the race.

Democratic challenger Gina Ortiz Jones is a strong candidate with a big network of national party support. She was raised by a single mother in San Antonio, served in the Air Force under “don’t ask, don’t tell” and, if elected, would be the first Filipina-American member of Congress.

She’s running hard on health care, spending millions calling out Hurd for voting eight times to repeal the Affordable Care Act and blasting him as “outraged on CNN, but complicit in Congress.”

gina ortiz jones
Gina Ortiz Jones talks to an attendee at an art show in Del Rio in October while a band plays in the background. JUSTIN MILLER
In an interview, Ortiz Jones brushed off concerns about low Latino turnout, emphasizing that her campaign is traveling all over the district and investing heavily in a strong field program: “There’s no blue wave without the work,” she said. The DCCC is also investing significant money in Spanish-language ads in San Antonio, according to a state party official.

But of all the competitive congressional races in Texas, the 23rd is looking the most bleak for Democrats. In a September special election, state Republicans were able to flip a long-held Democratic senate seat that includes much of the district. National Republicans recently canceled some scheduled ad spending in the race, perhaps a sign that they’re confident in Hurd’s chances. The district is notoriously difficult to poll, but the New York Times’ live polling project had Hurd leading Ortiz Jones by 8 percentage points back in September.

Even in what’s expected to be a big wave election for Democrats, will one of the most heavily Latino seats in Texas slip away yet again?


Ventura Mancha has heard it all before. At an early October roundtable discussion with a small group of veterans in the VFW’s Del Rio bingo hall, he reminds Ortiz Jones that politicians often come to town and make a bunch of promises, only to turn their backs on the small border community once they get elected. He’s heard it from Democrat Pete Gallego, the former congressman in the 23rd District, and he’s heard it from Hurd, who won the seat in 2014.

The problem, Mancha said, is that inaction is hurting Del Rio’s sizeable community of veterans. “We still don’t have a VA clinic down here,” he said. “We still have to drive to San Antonio. … When you get [to Washington, D.C.], don’t forget about us.”

gina ortiz jones
Ortiz Jones explains her plan to improve veteran services during a roundtable with U.S. military veterans at the Del Rio VFW post. JUSTIN MILLER
Mancha said he’s voted for Republicans in the past, but is now considering Ortiz Jones. He won’t talk badly about Trump — “right or wrong, he is the commander in chief” — but plenty of others at the event were less reserved. “Everybody knows he’s taking his presidency as a game, you know,” said Ramon Castillo, an Army veteran who was born across the river in Ciudad Acuña but became a U.S. citizen and grew up in Del Rio. “He thinks he’s the king.”

Meanwhile, Esther Chapoy and Dea Vallejo — both older Latina Republicans — were concerned that Ortiz Jones would support socialist policies, and they talked about Muslim people buying up land near the border with plans to invoke Sharia law. “President Trump is the best president we’ve ever had,” Chapoy told me at the VFW event. “Who cares if he doesn’t talk the way a president is supposed to talk. I don’t care. As long as he puts our country first and makes America great again — and keeps it great.”


In border counties like Val Verde, home to Del Rio, turnout rates have always been low — just over 8,000 of the more than 26,000 registered voters turned out in 2014. “A lot of people are like, ‘Why do I vote? Nothing changes.’ As a result, it’s getting harder and harder to turn people out,” Bobby Fernandez, the city’s former mayor, told me.

For years now, Democrats in Texas have been perplexed as to why Latinos haven’t become the political force that their population numbers would suggest. Political groups have spent millions trying to build up Latino outreach, but results have been lackluster. The state’s weak party infrastructure has a hard enough time turning out its typical base, let alone activating a whole new swath of untapped voters.

Demographics are, in fact, not destiny. Latinos — or any other group for that matter — are not going to vote unless they believe the political system is relevant to their daily lives. When you’re struggling to pay the bills and working one, two, even three jobs, the machinations of Washington and who controls the House of Representatives may not be on your mind.

In a new survey report put out by Jolt Texas, a group focused on building young Latino political power, 50 percent of young Latino respondents said they were cynical about politics — they don’t trust politicians and don’t think their vote would make any difference.

“It’s not their fault,” Matt Barreto, co-founder of Latino Decisions, a leading Latino polling firm, told the Observer “Look around and ask Latinos to name 10 things the political system has done for them. They’ll stop at zero.”

Still, he says that he’s seeing much higher levels of interest and engagement among Latino voters in Texas now than in 2014. Part of that is because of Trump, and part is because of the high-profile Senate race between Beto O’Rourke and Ted Cruz. The question, of course, is if the enthusiasm will carry over to the ballot box. That all depends on the candidates, who Barreto says need to be doing the hard work of connecting with unlikely voters who never get contacted in midterms: “If they’re just following the traditional model of reaching out to voters who’ve voted in the past, you’re never gonna break out of that cycle.”

gina ortiz jones
Beto and Ortiz Jones campaign signs sit in a yard in south San Antonio. JUSTIN MILLER
State Representative Poncho Nevárez, a Democrat from Eagle Pass who holds a seat that includes Del Rio and much of the rural area between San Antonio and El Paso, agrees that there will be a Latino uptick this cycle. O’Rourke’s field program, he says, has a marked presence in Eagle Pass and other border towns and is mobilizing new volunteers. “Wendy [Davis] and some of those other campaigns didn’t bother to do that stuff here,” Nevárez said.

But in the congressional race, Nevárez doesn’t think either candidate is doing enough to reach out to voters in his area and are focused too much on trying to run up turnout in Bexar.

In a new poll of nearly 400 registered Latino voters in Texas, Barreto’s Latino Decisions found that 44 percent of those characterized as traditionally unlikely voters are “almost certain” to vote in November. Nearly 70 percent of those unlikely voters said they haven’t been contacted in any way by a campaign or other political organization this year.


The southern outskirts of San Antonio are indicative of that cycle of undermoblization — it’s an underserved area with a lot of working-class families. Many of them didn’t vote in 2014, and therefore campaigns likely won’t reach out in 2018. That’s by design. Republicans gerrymandered CD 23 to include this part of San Antonio because it’s both heavily Latino and has exceedingly low turnout. The area helps maintain the district’s status as a minority opportunity seat without posing a political threat to the GOP.

Jim Kane has lived on the south side of San Antonio for most of his life and recently became precinct chair for his neighborhood. Rosey Abuabara, a San Antonio native who heads the Indivisible chapter for the 23rd Congressional District, often makes the trek from her home in the white, more affluent northwest suburbs (where Republicans like Hurd pull a lot of their votes) to block-walk with Kane — one of the few people Kane is able to depend on to help canvass the area.

gina ortiz jones
Rosey Abuabara, who heads a local Indivisible chapter in San Antonio, protested outside Rep. Will Hurd’s office for more than a year. Now, she’s focused on turning out Latino voters for Gina Ortiz Jones. JUSTIN MILLER
“Let’s be honest, Beto is not reaching out to people in my neighborhood,” Kane said, and Ortiz Jones isn’t doing enough either. Groups that specifically target low-propensity voters, like the Texas Organizing Project and the Bexar County Democrats’ coordinated campaign, will make some passes, but political campaigns simply don’t spend much time or resources here. The Beto events with “craft beers and all this other hoighty toighty bullshit,” Kane said, aren’t doing anything for anyone in his part of San Antonio.

“Someone like my father would never go to stuff like that,” Abuabara lamented. Her father, a bus driver, and mother, a seamstress, were the children of Mexican immigrants and they both eventually settled in San Antonio. Abuabara’s father was in a union, and its political education program instilled in him and his family strong Democratic voting habits.

That’s part of the reason that Latino turnout in Texas has historically been much lower than in other states, like California and New York, where unions are much stronger and more effective at mobilizing their members. With Texas’ weak unions, labor is a far less influential political player.

gina ortiz jones
Members of Stephen Alvarado’s family listen as Rosey Abuabara and Jim Kane talk to them about the elections. JUSTIN MILLER
On a Saturday evening, Abuabara and Kane drive the streets of his precinct, knocking on doors and delivering signs to people who’ve requested them. They bring signs for Beto and Ortiz Jones to post in Stephen Alvarado’s yard. Alvarado is a loyal Democratic voter and a custodian at a local school district. He’s eager to vote, but he doesn’t see Trump’s rhetoric and actions as a uniquely motivating factor for Latinos in South Texas. “It’s always the same. Some people in the same groups are motivated and then I see other groups that they’re too busy with their other daily lives,” Alvarado said.

Before calling it a night, Abuabara and Kane hit a few more houses — one man is eating dinner and hastens them away. They can put a Beto sign in his yard, but not a Gina Ortiz Jones sign. He’s never heard of her.
Sturgis
 
  3  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 12:30 pm
@edgarblythe,
That in a nutshell shows a major problem and disconnection with the Latino community by both the Dems and the Repubs. There is a huge population there, which, neither has seen fit to ready out to and involve themselves with.

Not anything new really. Except in rare instances, they decline to meet and greet with anything that isn't looking like freshly baked and sliced white bread.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 01:23 pm
@Sturgis,
Quote:
they decline to meet and greet with anything that isn't looking like freshly baked and sliced white

Bullshit. You are spouting rhetoric to support a narrative that at this time in our country has 0 basis in fact. Isolated cases are blown completely out of proportion and then jammed down throats by the MSM.

I hope you find your thinking hat soon.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 01:54 pm
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 05:45 pm
https://www.truthdig.com/articles/what-the-mainstream-media-isnt-telling-you-about-jamal-khashoggi/

excerpt:
You cannot judge this man’s entire decades-long career of journalism by reading the English-language, edited articles he posted for the last year only. For much of his life, for the whole of his life mind this last year, this man was a passionate, enthusiastic, unabashed advocate of Saudi despotism. He started his career by joining bin Laden and being a comrade of bin Laden. There are pictures of him with weapons. He fought alongside the fanatic mujahideen, who were supported by the United States in Saudi Arabia and Pakistan among others, against the communist, progressive side in that war. And he was unrelenting in his advocacy on their behalf, as well as for his praise for bin Laden.

He got to be pretty close to bin Laden. That’s not being mentioned in the media as well. He only broke with bin Laden in the mid 1990s, what a coincidence. It was around the same time that the Saudi government broke with bin Laden. That tells you that he has been very consistently an advocate and loyal servant of the Saudi propaganda apparatus. Because when people say that he always cared about journalism, what journalism? There is no journalism under the Saudi regime. There’s only propaganda, crude and vulgar propaganda. And he excelled in the art of Saudi propaganda. He moved from one job to the other, and he was very ambitious early on. And he attached himself to various princes, because that’s how it works in Saudi Arabia.

He was close to Prince Turki al-Faisal, who was chief of foreign intelligence and the sponsor patron of bin Laden and the fanatical Islamists around the world. And he also was loyal to his brother, Prince Khalid al-Faisal, who owned Al Watan newspaper where he held his first editing job in that paper. In a recent interview he did only last year with a Turkey-based television station, in Arabic of course, he spoke about how his role was not only as an editor, but he was a censor. He was enforcer of the rigid dogmas of the Saudi government in the paper. And when people wrote he got trouble doing his job, it wasn’t for anything he wrote. He never wrote a word, never spoke a word against the wishes of the Saudi government. He got in trouble because some people in the paper were courageous, unlike him, and dared to challenge the orthodoxy of the government. That was the career of Jamal Khashoggi.

I also should say that for many years he continued, and he became a spokesperson for Prince Turki when he became ambassador in Washington, DC. And he got to be close to Western journalists because he was the man to go to. When they wanted to travel to Saudi Arabia, they wanted to interview this prince, that king, the crown prince, he was the fixer for them in that regard and that’s how they got to know him. And then, he attached himself to another prince, Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal, who got in trouble with the new crown prince. That’s where his troubles started. He did not bet on democracy in Saudi Arabia, he bet on the wrong princes.

There princes he bet on fell out of favor, Prince Turki, as well as Prince Al-Waleed, later who wound up in Ritz in Riyadh last year. And for that reason, he had no prince. According to his own testimony, in an article that was written by David Ignatius who was close to him, he tried to be an advisor to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, but he wouldn’t take him as an advisor because he always was suspicious about his Islamist past, the fact that he was a member and later close to the Muslim Brotherhood. So, he became – spoke the language of democracy upon leaving the country.

The reason why they wanted to go after him, it had nothing do with his courage or anything like that. It’s because he was so central in the ruling media and political establishment, that his departure from the kingdom was not seen as dissent. He was not a dissenter, he was not a dissident. He never saw himself as one, or even an opposition figure. He spoke of himself as somebody who believed that the crown prince was doing the right thing but going about it the wrong way. I basically believe that he was seen by the government as a defector, that one of their own left the country and joined the enemies rank. And he was also having an audience with Western audiences from Washington DC, from one of the major mainstream newspapers. That was highly embarrassing to the ruling family.

In Arabic, I should mention, even in the last year on Twitter, he spoke a very different tone than what he wrote in The Washington Post. In Arabic, he spoke passionately about Palestine. Notice, he never spoke about Palestine in English, never spoke about that. In Arabic, he said, “We all are Trump” when Trump ordered the bombing of Syria. He never spoke like that in the Washington Post. So, he was an agreeable token writing for The Washington Post who never challenged the Western media and their coverage of the Middle East. And for that, he was quite agreeable to them. He never spoke about the Palestinians. I bet you, if he was advocating for the Palestinians or for the Islamist line that he called for in Arabic, he wouldn’t have lasted in his gig in The Washington Post.
edgarblythe
 
  4  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 07:32 pm
My last post was not an attempt at making out that the man was deserving of torture and death. It was a terrible crime. The Saudi government continues to disgust me, as it has for years.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 08:22 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
The Saudi government continues to disgust me, as it has for years.

What disgusts you is Islam. Sharia is followed strictly and it is a far right, misogynistic, violent, supremacist ideology. This mans murder can be justified under Sharia if he was killed to advance Islam. The Saudis consider themselves Islam. And this man was in their way.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Thu 18 Oct, 2018 09:56 pm
@Sturgis,
The way to win them over is to actually do something to benefit these people, something nobody does.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 04:23 pm
Most persons close to me are always on the side of the Republicans. My wife sometimes votes my way, but lately has not voted. Her natural inclination is Republican, but she wants Social Security and Medicare more than she is willing to support Republicans. I am going to see about her having mail in voting next time. I don't recall the exact age she can start. In fact, all but a few of the people I am writing about bother to vote at all. So, in my little circle, my vote looms large. Too bad it's a small circle.
0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  4  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 04:38 pm
@edgarblythe,
Quote:
In recent days, a cadre of conservative House Republicans allied with Trump has been privately exchanging articles from right-wing outlets that fuel suspicion of Khashoggi, highlighting his association with the Muslim Brotherhood in his youth and raising conspiratorial questions about his work decades ago as an embedded reporter covering Osama bin Laden, according to four GOP officials involved in the discussions who were not authorized to speak publicly
.

Quote:
While Khashoggi was once sympathetic to Islamist movements, he moved toward a more liberal, secular point of view, according to experts on the Middle East who have tracked his career. Khashoggi knew bin Laden in the 1980s and 1990s during the civil war in Afghanistan, but his interactions with bin Laden were as a journalist with a point of view who was working with a prized source.


WP


edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 04:51 pm
Why any reasonable person would consider Saudi Arabia a friend or even useful ally is beyond me.
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 05:21 pm
@edgarblythe,
It was a piece showing what the global right wing is pushing on this matter. Disgusting.
ehBeth
 
  4  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 05:22 pm
@revelette1,
Definitely a reason to stick with middle of the road media sources. Can't trust truthdig and the like - on either side.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 05:25 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
It was a piece showing what the global right wing

Righties are not globalists, they are populists more or less tasked with saving Western civilization, something the Left wants to disappear.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  1  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 06:55 pm
Truthdig is usually more accurate than that.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Fri 19 Oct, 2018 07:05 pm
Middle of the road media is only accurate within the confines of the owners' agenda. The New York Times for instance has gone off track, after at one time trying to live up to "All the news that's fit to print." They all ignore important news or trivialize important things.

edit
I find the Washington Post one of the better sources.
0 Replies
 
edgarblythe
 
  2  
Reply Sat 20 Oct, 2018 05:49 am
Al Jazeera is generally trustworthy
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/10/profile-jamal-khashoggi-saudi-writer-missing-turkey-181007184026645.html?fbclid=IwAR2VFhASFvI9Oa8QsuBoAVp9Fzgxy7YipiopCDf7E5q0nNLD9Ykb1RhVnAA
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.11 seconds on 07/14/2025 at 06:39:50