I'm sorry. You enjoy reading a hyper-partisan screed based on pseudo-psychoanalysis? Let's look at some of the highlights from Mr. Ducat...
Quote:Like a jilted lover out to prove his masculinity with a series of new conquests,

Metaphors are better left to poets and playwrights.
Quote: BuzzFlash: You're drawing a parallel between the extreme right wing in the United States and the Islamic fundamentalists,
Isn't that the goal of sites like Buzzflash? Make the conservatives look like the bad guys?
Quote:Stephen J. Ducat: Absolutely. It's a rather transparent code word for being feminized.
A code word? What is this, second grade?
Quote:Stephen J. Ducat: The Republican homosexuals are not only honorary heterosexuals; they become honorary homophobes, as the most recent scandal illustrated.
So only liberals can
really be homosexual now? Please.
Quote:BuzzFlash: So with Gannon, who said on his web sites, you know, that he was a military guy, a Marine, and always on top, he's acceptable because he's a man's man?
Stephen J. Ducat: Yeah.
BuzzFlash: He's not penetrated; he penetrates.
Stephen J. Ducat: That's right. Militarystud.com.
But it isn't about that, right cycloptichorn? The Gannon story has nothing to with his sexuality, right?
Quote: Stephen J. Ducat: Well, you know, there are a lot of different kinds of right-wing women. There are under and middle class Christian fundamentalist housewives who seek desperately to be the compliant good wife, to stay at home, who have embraced their position of subordination as a virtuous condition. And there are those who I think are more hypocritical, the highly educated, upper class women like Ann Coulter who advocate a life of domestic docility for the under class sisters. Meanwhile, they're in the public eye and are as powerful and self-authorizing as any male politician. And by being part of the economic elite, they can buy their way out of certain difficulties by virtue of their class position, whether it's having wealthy husbands or enough money in their own right to get the health care they need, to get the reproductive care they need and so on.
This doesn't offend you moral feminist liberals?!
Quote: Stephen J. Ducat: He put a woman in a position of power to implement his policies and cushion him from information that he doesn't want to know about. And you have to keep in mind, as highly placed as Condoleezza Rice is, she is his underling. She does the bidding of the core group of neo-cons.
BuzzFlash: If you're a woman, we'll let you in the club as long as you act like the guy on top?
Stephen J. Ducat: As long as you support and act like the guy on top. Of course, having Condoleezza Rice in her position doesn't translate into anything meaningful for other women. I think Condoleezza Rice's current position is evidence of how failure is no impediment to promotion in the Bush regime.
Reading this crap will lead you to what conclusions?
The problem I have with all of this is that liberals will read this, applaud it, cherish it, but fail to realize that it is garbage.