Lash wrote:This should have come out before the election. He'd likely have won by a bigger margin. He's honest. He said all this stuff before. If this is Bush speaking privately--he sure looks good.
I think you are underestimating your base. I live in Kentucky and I have talked to people after this election who voted for Bush. Almost to a one they voted for Bush because of his supposed moral values and they believed that those rumors about his drug use was just made up. It is now more or less confirmed. They don't think Bush was good for the economy but they felt that it came second to issues like abortion and homosexuals.
When you read the New York Times article, the impression that it leaves is one of someone almost being forced into some of these hard line stands he has taken because of his evangelist conservative base, in other words, a phoney. That would not sit good in the middle states where Bush did so good because of his stand on moral issues.
So while he may have won more over for his honesty, I think he would have lost those same people when they see how he treats his opponents and also would have lost his evangelist base.
If these things were what Wead considered not personal, I wonder what it is he is sitting on.