Thomas
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Jun, 2006 09:00 am
nimh wrote:
Quote:
Chavez had backed Humala in the Peruvian polls.

No he hadn't. Nobody but US imperialists would so blatantly interfere in a souvereign nation's internal affairs. (Unfortunately, and seriously, Garcia's victory does have an element of "out of the frying pan, into the fire".)
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Jun, 2006 09:27 am
From Spiegel Online

Quote:
During the campaign, far-left Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez had been endorsing runner-up Humala, hoping to gain an ally. But, "Garcia's victory eliminates the key in the Andean chain that Hugo Chavez is forging," Peruvian political analyst Mirko Lauer said, according to the Associated Press.

Despite Garcia's victory, Humala's party has the majority of seats in Congress and won 14 out of the 24 Peruvian states, which may make things difficult for the new leader of South America's third largest country. Moderate leftist Garcia has ruled the country once before, between 1985 and 1990.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Jun, 2006 09:27 am
In the same report, Spiegel summarises the reactions in German newspapers:
Quote:


Left-leaning Die Tageszeitung notes that "satisfaction is reigning in Washington" since Alan Garcia is again Peru's President. The editorial clearly recognizes the outcome of this election as a strong counter to current political trends, but "Peruvian institutions are weak and discredited". No one knows just how far to the left Garcia will have to move in order to satisfy his voters. This will also depend on the political skills of Ollanta Humalas, who will need to prove that he is, in fact, a political force to be reckoned with.

Center-right daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung summarizes the decision as "an election that wasn't an election," since citizens had to decide between former officer Humala, who presents an insecure future and former president Garcia, who had almost lead the country into collapse 16 years ago. And "now they gave the former president the chance to get it right the second time." Parting president Alejandro Toledo leaves his successor with a growing economy, low inflation and low national debt. "But numbers aren't edible," the editorial states. So Garcia's agenda needs to include strengthening economic and foreign policy as well as "placing the responsibility for the country on those who so far have not taken part in its positive development."

Center-left daily Süddeutsche Zeitung is surprised at Garcia's repeat victory. The new President stands for a minority: born into a white elitist society, he received a university education, while former military officer Ollanta Humala's home lies in the somewhat underdeveloped Andes. Both candidates appealed to different parts of the population. For the winner, the situation is difficult, the paper points out. Peru's population is divided due to the century-old system of rich great land owners on the one hand and many impoverished peasants on the other. So "the new President should take the requirements of the exploited population seriously. He will not get a third chance." And, Humala and Chavez will be waiting for mistakes.
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Tue 6 Jun, 2006 11:38 pm
Peru had a choice between bad and worse. They have chosen bad. We can hope that Garcia has learned something since his last Presidency.

It does appear to be true that from Colombia to Peru and possibly to Mexico the assumed left wing populist movement in Latin America has stalled. UNfortunately the alternatives to it in several of these countries are not a great deal better. Mexico appears to be moving forward a bit but overall South America is a continent of failed expectations. So far there is little basis on which to see any change in that long-standing condition.
0 Replies
 
JTT
 
  1  
Reply Thu 8 Jun, 2006 05:37 pm
georgeob1 wrote:
Peru had a choice between bad and worse. They have chosen bad. We can hope that Garcia has learned something since his last Presidency.


If that is indeed the case for Peru, george - and it's hard to take it at face value coming from you, a master of sly deception - what you've described is exactly what the USA did, twice no less.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Sat 10 Jun, 2006 01:27 pm
june 10

President Hugo Chavez is prepping his "ragtag armies" just in case the United States invades Venezuela, according to an article set for Sunday's New York Times, RAW STORY has found.

As dawn broke in this gritty city adorned with revolutionary graffiti and murals one day recently, about 300 residents practiced military-style marching, strutting under the hot sun and clicking their heels in a salute to their commander. This ragtag army of nurses, students and other citizens is one of many being formed throughout Venezuela, part of President Hugo Chavez's attempt to create Latin America's largest civilian reserve force.

http://www.rawstory.com/news/2006/Chavez_preps_army_in_case_US_0610.html

The drills here and in other towns are part of Chavez's rising military profile, which includes arms purchases and what he contends will be the training of as many as 2 million citizens to fight a guerrilla war, in preparation for what Chavez claims is the threat of invasion by the United States.

Officials at the U.S. Embassy in Caracas insist that no such plans exist. But their denials do not appear to convince Chavez, who was briefly ousted in a 2002 coup tacitly supported by Bush administration officials.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 16 Jun, 2006 02:32 am
Venezuela Purchasing 24 New Russian-Made Fighter Jets
By VOA News
15 June 2006


Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez says his government will purchase 24 new Russian Sukhoi fighter jets this year to replace a fleet of U.S.-made F-16s.

President Chavez made the announcement Wednesday in a speech before hundreds of soldiers at a military base in Caracas.

http://www.voanews.com/english/2006-06-15-voa17.cfm
0 Replies
 
georgeob1
 
  1  
Reply Sat 17 Jun, 2006 04:31 am
Well, that will make it easier for us if we have to do something.
0 Replies
 
Amigo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 27 Jun, 2006 05:30 pm
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 12 Jul, 2006 01:29 pm
Quote:
President Alvaro Uribe's government is lobbying to restrict a U.N. agency that has been the most trusted monitor of human rights violations in Colombia, according to foreign diplomats and rights activists.

The diplomats say Colombian officials are trying to remove the agency's right to publicly criticize human rights abuses and publish an annual report on one of the hemisphere's worst rights records. And with the U.N. human rights office's four-year mandate expiring in October, the agency is particularly vulnerable, they say...

Washington, meanwhile, stands out in its support of Uribe, its firmest ally in South America. Despite a March letter from 61 foreign and Colombian human rights and development organizations asking U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice to support the agency's current mission, U.S. Embassy officials in Bogota said Washington won't get involved.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/world/AP-Colombia-UN-Human-Rights-LH1.html
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Aug, 2006 11:35 pm
Chávez says China deal 'great wall' against US

Quote:
Chine and Venezuela, two of the biggest nations on Washington's worry list, drew closer together yesterday with the signing of trade agreements that the Venezuelan president called a "Great Wall" against American hegemonism.
A million-barrel a day oil deal and a promise by China to back Venezuela's bid to join the United Nations security council were the main fruits of a week of meetings in Beijing, ending with talks between Hugo Chávez and the Chinese prime minister, Wen Jiabao, yesterday.
...
China agreed to increase its imports of Venezuelan oil, refined fuels and a hydrocarbon called Orimulsion from the current 160,000 barrels a day to 500,000 by 2009 and a million by 2016.
...
According to the Venezuelan media, China has also agreed to build houses for 20,000 people as a contribution towards Mr Chávez's policy of reducing homelessness. Chinese state-controlled news agencies say Beijing will also help the South American nation build a fibre optic network, modernise a gold mine and develop railways and farm irrigation systems.
... ... ...
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Sat 26 Aug, 2006 05:32 am
Walter

China has also been making substantial trade (and security?) arrangements with India. And a number of African states. Not to mention Canada. It will be interesting to see what the world looks like in twenty years.

Good article here by Jeff Madrick reviewing Kevin Phillips book (Phillips had worked in the Nixon administration). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/19058
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 03:38 am
Quote:
US accused of bid to oust Chávez with secret funds

· Millions of dollars given to opposition, claim critics
· Venezuelan groups' details hidden from list

Duncan Campbell
Wednesday August 30, 2006
The Guardian

The US government has been accused of trying to undermine the Chávez government in Venezuela by funding anonymous groups via its main international aid agency.
Millions of dollars have been provided in a "pro-democracy programme" that Chávez supporters claim is a covert attempt to bankroll an opposition to defeat the government.

The money is being provided by the US Agency for International Development (USAID) through its Office of Transition Initiatives.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/venezuela/story/0,,1860867,00.html
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Aug, 2006 07:56 am
Chavez is getting into a quandry with his oil deals.

America remains his best market because we have the refineries which can deal with the heavier crude from Venezuela, China will have to build refineries for it.

Also it costs more to ship it to China and has to be sold at a lower price.

American Citgo marketers are reporting a loss of sales because of Hugo's rhetoric not setting well with the general public.

The fool is going to keep talking until he ruins a good thing.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 07:07 am
Chavez foot in mouth results. This is the second big marketer I have read about who have left Citgo in the past 6 months, both have stated 'it wasn't due to Chavez remarks'...yet it's very curious timing wise. Even 7-Eleven admits his remarks, 'didn't tempt us to stay with Citgo'. The fact is the disenchantment with Chavez goes back over a year...and marketers were already rethinking the Citgo relationships then. Both these recent marketers made like comments about it not being because of Chavez but at the same time making comments to suggest otherwise...prolly for their own political reasons.

More than likely in the oil business you never want to completely break supply relations...you never know with tight supply when you'll need a partner. For now it's the heat of the moment...I myself heard more than one person say that they won't buy Citgo product after hearing Chavez rattle off.


Quote:


Source
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Thu 28 Sep, 2006 10:51 pm
It seems to me that Chavez's antics are designed to serve political purposes. Now that I can't buy Citgo, that does not mean I'll buy Exxon or Chevron.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 03:31 am
JLNobody wrote:
It seems to me that Chavez's antics are designed to serve political purposes. Now that I can't buy Citgo, that does not mean I'll buy Exxon or Chevron.


Who said you CANT buy from Citgo?
There are people boycotting Citgo,but you dont have to participate if you dont want to.
0 Replies
 
JLNobody
 
  1  
Reply Fri 29 Sep, 2006 01:58 pm
But where do you get it. Seven-eleven is its only distributor that I know of. Besides, our facist government might detain and render me for being an enemy combatant.
0 Replies
 
mysteryman
 
  1  
Reply Sat 30 Sep, 2006 01:27 am
JLNobody wrote:
But where do you get it. Seven-eleven is its only distributor that I know of. Besides, our facist government might detain and render me for being an enemy combatant.


There are thousands of Citgo gas stations in this country.
0 Replies
 
Brand X
 
  1  
Reply Mon 2 Oct, 2006 06:13 pm
Citgo has/had 14,000 independent branded outlets in the US.

Quote:
Mihos and 7-Eleven to stop selling CITGO

citgologoYarmouth's Christy Mihos owns fourteen Christy Markets here, and nine of them sell CITGO gas, or they did until now.

In yet another bold stroke Mihos got a ton of ink for his independent campaign to be governor by pre-empting any criticism for selling the gas from Venezuelan despot Hugo Chavez. The Herald today reported;

Mihos' store chain cutting ties with Chavez
By Jay Fitzgerald/ Boston Herald

Gubernatorial candidate Christy Mihos yesterday said he's negotiating to cancel his business contracts with Citgo over Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's recent anti-American "devil" rants at the United Nations. Mihos' action came as Dallas-based 7-Eleven said it's ending a longtime dealership relationship with Citgo, a subsidiary of a Venezuelan government-owned company.

While the giant convenience-store chain had previously planned to cut its ties with Citgo, a 7-Eleven spokeswoman said Chavez's anti-American tirades made its decision much easier. Twenty-seven 7-Eleven stores in Massachusetts will stop selling Citgo gas in coming weeks, the company said. ..



Source
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Venezuela Watch
  3. » Page 17
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 05/05/2024 at 09:20:35