Are there any women who actually desire sex?

you betcha

if not, the world population would be done to a half dozen or so

I think women are more careful about who they have relations with, as most don't want to be a teen mom or have a child when they're 18 (and yet it still happens, which should answer your question). But it depends on the girl. I once dated an 18 year old when I was 25, and that was like, ALL she ever wanted to do, she was begging for it by date 2. I mean, it was a nice change to not have to do all the work for once. But a lot of girls don't want to be seen as a slut, so they'll be picky and choosy. Just hang out with girls until you find someone who wants to. In most cases I would think they would want something more than a one-night stand though, but ya never know.

Most men don't have much luck with casual sex. A woman who wants to have a fling has it easy, they just need to go out in public and make themselves accessible and men will come to them. They get their choice. The men who are being chosen, and having casual sex, are the most aggressive and physically attractive. In reality, about 15% of the men are having sex with 80% of the women.

This, by the way, explains the "Me Too" phenomenon. The reason that these men are acting like complete jerks is because they are rewarded for it. Men who aren't aggressive and who don't cross boundaries don't get very much sex.

Oh yeah? Prove it.

I am living proof that that ain't so.

With how many women did you have sex in the past year, Centrox? If you are in a long term monotonous relationship, that isn't what we are talking about.

I am aged 65. I have been in a monogamous relationship for 24 years. prior to that, between the ages of 17 and 41, I had sexual relationships of some form (one-night stands, short or longer dating or cohabitation, one marriage) with approximately 50 women. That's the nearest number I can come up with. That's around 2 per year over the period. I would say that the earlier years were loaded more than the later ones, i.e. around 3 per year in my 20s. That may not seem like very much to some people, but I did have studies, a life and a career, as well as a sex life to think about. I am definitely not an aggressive, domineering type. I think I got the sexual attention I did as a result of trying to be a nice fellow who does not treat women like they are idiots. I live in a university city and a sense of humour and knowledge of art and literature can go a long way around here.

truly does go a long way

when I set off for university my mother told me I should never have sex with someone I couldn`t laugh with - it was a great piece of advice

I`ve never much cared what men were interested in - as long as they had interests and passions.

Passions and laughter are winners when it comes to sexual interest and compatibility for me.

Ability to wear jeans well never hurts.

sheer physical attraction was sometimes enough in the early days but without some laughter there was never a second go-round for me, which did cause a few problems as there are men - and - women - who think their appearance is enough to make them sexually desirable.

I have no way to judge you in real life Centrox, but here you do seem to be an aggressive domineering type here. I have yet to see you step away from a fight, and you have a strong sense of righteousness. You react quite strongly when someone crosses a line for you.

I don't see you as very tolerant or kind of people of whom you don't approve. I imagine that your conquests found that quite attractive.

You fit the stereotype of an assertive, dominant male here.

You claim to have had more than your share of sexual conquests (the average is around 7). The number you give fits my assertion that a few men have far more than the average number of women (meaning that others have far fewer than average). Props for that.

Here are the data. As you can see, there are about 17% of men who have a very large number of partners (compared to 3% of women). These prodigious men are obviously having sex with women who are less active.

It is clear that there is a small group of men (about 15%) who are having sex with multiple partners from a significantly larger group of women. I suspect that this is a function of evolution... but it certainly has a social impact on how mating works in modern society.

Of course, there are also economic implications...

(Digging into the data, there is a weird little spike of men who claim to have had more than 50 partners. This is not a smooth distribution, 3% of men claim to have had 50 partners compared to less than a tenth of a percent of men claiming to have had 40. The corresponding spike for females is less than 0.25% percent. This should be interesting to any math nerds reading... )

That would pretty much explain why you've been lucking out.

Don't suppose you know any belly dancers?

hahaha

I'm yours qaw.

There is an economic reality to sex. It is clear that sex has a far greater economic value to most men than it does to most women. That is how markets work.

When heterosexual sex is put on the open market, it is almost always the man who is paying the woman for her services. It seems to me that the price is generally 1 or 2 days typical wages across cultures.

This economic truth crosses cultures and ages, men were paying women for sex in as recorded ancient Greece, Asia and Bronze age Middle Eastern cultures. It even crosses species, there are birds where the male pays (i.e. offers something of value) for the right to copulate with an attractive female.

More bucks for your bang?

what you have defined is a prostitute and there are millions available

That is incorrect.

A desire for sex does not make a woman a prostitute.

The desire for sex was the question however:



is an attitude that might suit a prostitute.

Love your profile. We should become fast friends.