True, Freeduck.
McG, I don't know any more about the reality of AQ than you do. All we can go off of is their history of attacks, which support my thesis.
As I said earlier,
Quote:Also, let's think logically: attacks are meant to succeed. AQ is up against a giant opponent with tons of resources. They have to be careful. Better to take things slow than to rush and ruin plans.
All you have to do is try to put yourself in their shoes for a minute, and ask yourself, would you rather take the time to do the job right, or not? Then see how silly what has been proposed is, that we've somehow
scared them into stopping. Yeah f*cking right.
Any AQ plot that was stopped, a major one, would be all over the media as the Bushco trumpets how effective all their new systems have been at stopping terrorism. You know this; they'd even have a hard time covering it up if they wanted to, as the DHS needs to show some successes, and the leaks to the media these days seem to be everywhere (even in Bush's own cabinet, sometimes).
We can fight terrorism and protect civil liberties and dignity simultaneously. But, given that you think that terrorism is our number one concern, where are the articles posted by you screaming about how open our borders are? What have we
really done to prevent further attacks? Questions we have no answers to. Despite the umbrella excuse of 'n'tnal security,' we still have a right as citizens to know how our money is being used to prosecute this war on terror. AND a responsibility.
Plenty of fear still around, though. Makes for great 'political capital,' know what I mean?
Cycloptichorn