2
   

The calligraphy! Would you like to type them out?

 
 
roger
 
  2  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2017 11:06 pm
@oristarA,
Maybe they think if they present enough non evidence as evidence, it will suggest guilt - if there is enough of it.
0 Replies
 
chai2
 
  2  
Reply Thu 16 Nov, 2017 11:47 pm
@oristarA,
oristarA wrote:

PUNKEY wrote:

This is about the Roy Moore sexual harassment issue. One of his accusers has presented this yearbook signature from 1977 as evidence.


Yeah Punkey. That is the point.

If the note is so clean, why would the accusers have presented it? Do they play the role of Chicken Little?


Because they are throwing **** at the wall and seeing if any of it sticks.
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Nov, 2017 02:14 am
@PUNKEY,
It's proof that Roy Moore knew his accusers which is something he denies. It may not be proof of abuse but it's proof that Moore is a liar.
0 Replies
 
oristarA
 
  1  
Reply Fri 17 Nov, 2017 02:33 am
@chai2,
chai2 wrote:


Because they are throwing **** at the wall and seeing if any of it sticks.


Okay you have a point. That pic thread is closed now to avoid misunderstanding.

Cheer up.

PS. I've reported the pic thread to be deleted.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

deal - Question by WBYeats
Let pupils abandon spelling rules, says academic - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Please, I need help. - Question by imsak
Is this sentence grammatically correct? - Question by Sydney-Strock
"come from" - Question by mcook
concentrated - Question by WBYeats
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/26/2024 at 11:43:54