"Existence is anything at all which we know to be real from our conscious experience and reasoning."
“In concept God is first and foremost the creator cause of everything with a beginning.”
_________________________
That is the objection from the existence of evil.
So, dear atheists, your objection that evil exists so God is not all good, therefore God does not exist.
First, tell me, who convinced you that there is evil at all, and that God is supposed to be all good, while thus in fact He is not – because there is the fact of evil?
Now, when you say to me who told you that there is evil and that God is all good, or is supposed to be all good:
Tell you what, dear stupid gullible atheists, you and your fellow mentors of the same stupid and perverse ilk, always lying or if not lying then altogether foully marinated in your self-conditioned stupid thinking, so that in term of genuine thinking you are weirdoes of nonsensical self-stymied thinking, tell you what:
Dare to talk between you and your stupid and wicked lying fellow atheist mentors, to ask yourselves:
What is evil, and what is good, in regard to what entities, i.e. on what or from whose criteria have you and your stupid but also lying fellow atheist mentors, like one Bertrand Russell whose mind was so muddled up in regard to God existing or not, because he discovered gnikcuf*
(read that in reverse, from right to left), I ask you on whose criteria have you come to the concept of what is evil and what is good?
Dear readers here, let us all sit back and await with bated breath for our colleagues here, atheists, to tell us from whose criteria have they come to their concept of what is good and what is evil.
But I tell you, and this is the ultimate stupid socalled argument of atheists,
scil., they will now come up with their last trump card, proclaiming:
"We do not know because we cannot know."
There, Oh ye atheists, that is why you are so stupid, because you do not know and you also claim to not be able to know, in the present context, "On whose criteria have you come to your concept of what is good and what is evil," in which case you should just shut up and ask people who know, like yours truly.
And don't forget the distinction between your stupid conceptival realm and the objectival default realm of things in the totality of reality which is independent of your stupid and wicked mind, namely, that default realm of objectival reality, it is EXISTENCE!
Okay, dear readers here, let us all sit back and await with bated breath for atheists to reply to my present message, which is:
On whose criteria have you come to your concept of what is evil and what is good, and also thus present your appropriated concepts of what is evil and what is good.
Later, see you guys all tomorrow.
*
Bertrand Russell - The New York Times
http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/m/monk-01russell.html
... There is a story that on one of his lecture tours of America, Russell found himself at dinner sitting next to the principal of a respectable girls' college, who asked him: 'Why did you give up philosophy?' To which he is supposed to have replied: 'Because I discovered I preferred *******.' The story is probably apocryphal, though it chimes with many things that Russell did say, including his remark to Virginia Woolf that his devotion to serious intellectual work came to an end when 'my passions got hold of me'. There is no doubt that Russell's love for Ottoline, and his subsequent romantic adventures, helped to weaken the hold on him of his absorption in the philosophy of mathematics. What finally killed his interest in mathematics, however, as he himself acknowledged, was the impact of Ludwig Wittgenstein, which, as Russell was to write in My Philosophical Development, 'came in two waves'. [Etc.]
PS I am enjoying myself tremendously here, elsewhere I would have been suddenly banned forever with writing as I write here.
