1
   

US Soldier Executes Iraqi - War Crime Caught on Video Tape

 
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:22 pm
Quote:
Yes, I rather understood that to be your point: The US should be measured against a different yardstick than the rest of the world.


Well, when you consistently claim the position of moral superiority when dealing with the affairs of other countries, you ARE judged by a different yardstick.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
RfromP
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:25 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
I disagree that the insurgent? Iraqi? (we don't know) was entitled to a fair hearing.


You are wrong.

Everyone, even a murderer, is entitled to a fair hearing.

Otherwise, we are no different than they are.

Cycloptichorn


My opinion is neither right nor wrong as is yours. It is just that: opinion. You are not the judge of other people's opinions. So cram it.

You may think we are no different than they are but I know the difference. There is a distinctive good and bad element. These killers need to be to stopped, plain and simple.
0 Replies
 
Cycloptichorn
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:29 pm
Quote:
My opinion is neither right nor wrong as is yours. It is just that: opinion. You are not the judge of other people's opinions. So cram it.

You may think we are no different than they are but I know the difference. There is a distinctive good and bad element. These killers need to be to stopped, plain and simple.


YOU cram it. Your opinion IS wrong. Take your relativism elsewhere.

Justice is not situational. When you claim to have the moral superiority that we do, you have a responsibility to uphold that moral superiority.

Murder is murder. You don't have the right to murder someone, even if they are evil. If you call them killers, then that boy who shot a man in the head while he was laying there is guilty of murder and is a killer as well. To say otherwise makes you the exact same as the terrorists, and certainly no American and no patriot.

Cycloptichorn
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:35 pm
Cyclo - Guilty BEFORE trial? Guilty before all evidence is examined???

Great how you show support for our troops.
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:42 pm
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.
0 Replies
 
RfromP
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:43 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
YOU cram it. Your opinion IS wrong. Take your relativism elsewhere.

Justice is not situational. When you claim to have the moral superiority that we do, you have a responsibility to uphold that moral superiority.

Murder is murder. You don't have the right to murder someone, even if they are evil. If you call them killers, then that boy who shot a man in the head while he was laying there is guilty of murder and is a killer as well. To say otherwise makes you the exact same as the terrorists, and certainly no American and no patriot.

Cycloptichorn


Aren't you the superior one? How dare I have an opinion that differs from yours? I'm not going anywhere. You take your pomposity elsewhere.

It's not relativism it's realism. The world is not going to be rid of terrorism with trials.

Attacking my patriotism to try to "win" your argument is feeble and will not work with me.
0 Replies
 
woiyo
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:45 pm
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.


On that, I can agree with you completely.
0 Replies
 
JustWonders
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:47 pm
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.


Me either. These guys are exhausted, just now getting hot meals, and not one soul here can begin to comprehend what horrors they've been witness to. If news accounts are true, he wasn't solely concerned for himself, but also for his buddies that were with him. It's tragic for everyone concerned, but those concerned were there. We aren't.
0 Replies
 
Ticomaya
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 02:54 pm
Cycloptichorn wrote:
Quote:
My opinion is neither right nor wrong as is yours. It is just that: opinion. You are not the judge of other people's opinions. So cram it.

You may think we are no different than they are but I know the difference. There is a distinctive good and bad element. These killers need to be to stopped, plain and simple.


YOU cram it. Your opinion IS wrong. Take your relativism elsewhere.

Justice is not situational. When you claim to have the moral superiority that we do, you have a responsibility to uphold that moral superiority.

Murder is murder. You don't have the right to murder someone, even if they are evil. If you call them killers, then that boy who shot a man in the head while he was laying there is guilty of murder and is a killer as well. To say otherwise makes you the exact same as the terrorists, and certainly no American and no patriot.

Cycloptichorn


Cyclops, your remark is confusing. I don't have a problem with your telling him to "cram it," but he is not engaging in "relativism." He is railing AGAINST relativism when he says, in effect, "Good is good, and bad is bad." It is "relativism" that would measure the actions of the US against a different yardstick merely because it, in your words, "claims the position of moral superiority." That is the position you have taken.
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:02 pm
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.


So much for the claim to be a well "trained", well "organised", well DISCIPLINED army Rolling Eyes

If the guy had a gun, I think the soldier would have shouted something to that effect ye know like "get down he has a gun" type thing.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:04 pm
Perhaps the title of this thread should be...

U.S. Marine Illegally Executes Iraqi Illegal Insurgent.
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:08 pm
Or maybe evn:

" Soldier of an ILLEGAL OCCUPYING force, ILLEGALLY executes a man because he didn't want him in HIS country!!!
0 Replies
 
kickycan
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:09 pm
gav wrote:
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.


So much for the claim to be a well "trained", well "organised", well DISCIPLINED army Rolling Eyes

If the guy had a gun, I think the soldier would have shouted something to that effect ye know like "get down he has a gun" type thing.


Of course you know that, because you have been in that situation before. Oh wait a minute, you haven't. You've been sitting here playing armchair judge, jury and executioner on the internet.
0 Replies
 
Larry434
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:19 pm
gav wrote:
Or maybe evn:

" Soldier of an ILLEGAL OCCUPYING force, ILLEGALLY executes a man because he didn't want him in HIS country!!!


What credible authority has charged the occupation is illegal and that insurgents are not?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:28 pm
kickycan wrote:
gav wrote:
kickycan wrote:
I don't know what happened, but in my opinion, being in Fallujah, fighting insurgents...it's got to be a completely f*cked up situation, and I don't know whether it is technically a war crime or not, but it has got to be very hard to think clearly in that situation. I don't know that I would not do the same thing that soldier did.


So much for the claim to be a well "trained", well "organised", well DISCIPLINED army Rolling Eyes

If the guy had a gun, I think the soldier would have shouted something to that effect ye know like "get down he has a gun" type thing.


Of course you know that, because you have been in that situation before. Oh wait a minute, you haven't. You've been sitting here playing armchair judge, jury and executioner on the internet.


Careful Kicky. You're arguing against a true anti-American here... not one of the pikers who just acts like it. It takes a special kind of man to extrapolate from one soldier's actions that the entire United States Armed Forces are not well "trained", well "organised". Only a few types of "special" explain such behavior. You are either anti-American or:



















http://www.osmond-riba.org/lis/graphics/Tinfoil1.jpg
or















http://www.jdhodges.com/l_photos/1/photos_2003_08_31_tulsa_and_springfield/pb023655.jpg
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:30 pm
kickycan wrote:
Of course you know that, because you have been in that situation before. Oh wait a minute, you haven't. You've been sitting here playing armchair judge, jury and executioner on the internet.


Yip, thats why I didn't sign up to be a soldier - I don't think i could deal with such a situation. Therefore I would expect people that were willing to sign up and recieve the training to deal with it professionally, as I'm sure such a situation came up in said training.
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:32 pm
Bill one of your images didn't come up there. But is the top one you with a hastily made aliminium foil hat?
0 Replies
 
OCCOM BILL
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:35 pm
gav wrote:
Bill one of your images didn't come up there. But is the top one you with a hastily made aliminium foil hat?
Yep. Sorry... I'll find another image for the second one. Thanks for pointing it out.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:37 pm
Ticomaya wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
Ticomaya wrote:
Bi-Polar Bear wrote:
timberlandko wrote:
Quote:
Family of hostage Margaret Hassan says she is probably dead
Tuesday, November 16, 2004


(11-16) 09:39 PST LONDON (AP) --

The family of Margaret Hassan, the 59-year-old aid worker kidnapped in Iraq last month, said Tuesday they believed she was dead.

A statement from Hassan's four brothers and sisters was released by Britain's Foreign Office.

"Our hearts are broken," it said. "We have kept hoping for as long as we could, but we now have to accept that Margaret has probably gone and at last her suffering has ended."


Think about it.


It is comforting to know that the Iraqi who was shot in the head has no parents or loved ones to grieve over his death........otherwise one would think his life had value as well....and what treasonous un-american bastard would think that?


I'm not claiming the dead member of the insurgency's life had little or no value, but do you fail to see the contrast in the killing of Margaret Hassan, a charity worker who has devoted her life to helping the Iraqi people, with the killing of a militant member of the insurgency who was obviously taking an active part in attacking members of the US military on the battlefield?

Added to the mix is the apparent fact that these terrorists/insurgents have in the past engaged in the despicable tactic of feigning death in order to lure US soldiers closer, where they shoot them or blow themselves up.


I concede that the Iraqi insurgent placed himself into that situation and has to shoulder his share of the blame for his own demise yes....and I suppose given that circumstance was more likely than that unfortunate lady to be killed and I do not have any particular sympathy for him as I do Ms. Hassan...........but that's not the point..... murder 1 is murder 1 ....and we are supposed to be the good guys....not the ones that are killing unarmed and injured people no matter how despicable they might be....that's what gives us the God almighty moral high ground the administration and it's supporters are always going on about ad nauseum......on paper anyway.....


Yes, I rather understood that to be your point: The US should be measured against a different yardstick than the rest of the world.

I agree with other remarks I've seen that the full circumstances surrounding this unfortunate incident need to be investigated.


Can it possibly be your opinion that we should be viewed as, listened to, cooperated with and defered to by a higher standard as a super power, but when one of our people shoots someone in the head we should be judged by the same yardstick as everyone else? Because that's what it sounds like you're saying and guess what? It can't work that way in the long run...if you take the moral high ground you have to take it in all areas all the time not just the convenient ones at convenient times.......
0 Replies
 
gav
 
  1  
Reply Tue 16 Nov, 2004 03:38 pm
What is it with you Bill and silly hats? Try making one with a knob and two nuts on it then you might have found one to suit you!!! Very Happy
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.03 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 09:35:39