Reply
Mon 15 Nov, 2004 12:31 pm
...well? Who will it be? You Republicans are so set in your ways and have also shown that you'll follow your President blindly. You are completely convinced that you are doing the right thing in Iraq. So taking that into account I'm assuming the same treatment should be handed out to other nations led by "despots" eg Iran, North Korea.
So who will it be? You can't bring your "democracy" to one nation and leave others around the globe to suffer - that just wouldn't be fair now, would it?
I'm thinking Syria. Smaller, less of an Army, helps protect Israel at the same time.
Cycloptichorn
Nah...they saw what happened to Uday and Qusay...they're still hiding under the bed.
Yeah, we are SO bad...Kicked Saddam's butt and killed his sons...
Who's gonna be next? I just wonder...
Nice post.
So you are suggesting we are war mongers and looking for another battle?
Did you feel that way during Afganistan, Yugoslavia, Kuwait?
We displayed that attitude pretty well when it came to Iraq. How else should people judge us than by our actions?
Cycloptichorn
Actions suggest more than one action.
My point exactly. Thanks
No. My point was that crowing about killing a couple of Saddam's sons is kind of pathetic. Sure they deserved justice, but killing them is hardly a military achievement.
Nor is leveling Falluja, our current military effort. Do you really think this is gonna stop the terrorists?
What was your point, exactly?
Cycloptichorn
Canada is harboring a lot of Americans that voted for Kerry after the election. Canada has oil. Canada has cheap pharmaceuticals, including flu vaccine. I say Canada.
Grenada, it worked for Reagan.
woiyo wrote:Nice post.
So you are suggesting we are war mongers and looking for another battle?
Did you feel that way during Afganistan, Yugoslavia, Kuwait?
You have waged a war on terror, when your finished in Iraq, where will you go next in you pursuit to rid the world of terrorists? North Korea and Iran were part of the axis of evil (Bush's words not mine), when will you be going after them?
Simple question woiyo
Where-ever the security of the US is threatened, is always an enemy.
Should continued negotiations with N.Korea and Iran fail to reach a compromise, and those nations pose a threat to our national security, I expect the President to use all necessary means to protect the citizens of the US and eliminate the threat.
If EU negotiations with Iran fail you mean? And I dont think you're talking directly to North Korea either!!!
LOL - Yea right --- Negotiations with the EU. You mean this agreement?
http://nytimes.com/2004/11/15/international/middleeast/15cnd-iran.html?ei=5094&en=f809ee363a1db915&hp=&ex=1100581200&adxnnl=1&partner=homepage&adxnnlx=1100548361-hL1LhZhf9sfepH7YLr3cuQ
From the article..."France, Britain and Germany announced today that they had reached a formal agreement with Iran that commits the country to suspend production of enriched uranium that can be used to make nuclear bombs in exchange for an array of possible rewards.
Under the complex but limited agreement, Iran agreed to stop all uranium enrichment activities while it negotiates with the three European countries and the European Union over the possible benefits it might receive.
The agreement is a diplomatic victory for both the Europeans and the Iranians, although both sides had to make hard concessions and it is not nearly as far-reaching as the Europeans had sought.
The Europeans were deeply embarrassed after Iran violated the terms of a less-precise agreement that both sides reached in Tehran 13 months ago. "
Maybe this time???
But dya know what? Whatever they have achieved this time, thousands of civilians weren't butchered to get it!!
What we will probably do is treat each nation with a foriegn policy tailored to fit the needs of each individual country instead of trying to play some sophmoric game of "Which country is next?".
In other words " We'll sit back and decide which country has the worst military capability, we'll make some sh*t up and invade and try and look like the greatest military in the world" - now thats sophmoric just on a deadlier scale!!
gav wrote:In other words " We'll sit back and decide which country has the worst military capability, we'll make some sh*t up and invade and try and look like the greatest military in the world" - now thats sophmoric just on a deadlier scale!!
If that's how the liberal mind tanslates what I said, it explains a lot of the reactions liberals bring upon themselves.
Equus wrote:Canada is harboring a lot of Americans that voted for Kerry after the election. Canada has oil. Canada has cheap pharmaceuticals, including flu vaccine. I say Canada.
Blame Canada! Blame Canada! They're not even a real country anyway...