My documentaries, the documentaries that I recommend

My introduction and probably a more complete assertive nuanced aproach to the previous debate above would be:
The Phenomena of reality and the Reality of phenomena.
...we got the soundbyte instead...

I can accept the possibility that there could be 'Something' (a metaphor for matter/energy/space/time) rather than 'Nothing' (no anything) for no reason at all. But then to extrapolate from that, the ability of 'Something' to self-organize itself into what we observe now, is a bridge too far.

He spoke on contingency and on causality, but in my opinion, both concepts are misunderstood in Ontology. Causality and Contingency make sense within Spacetime, outside, what you have is a perfect correlation, an Order of events that is timeless. From there its easy to conclude that Everythingness is a brupt fact and that Nothingness BY DEFINITION excludes itself from existence, it is a contradictory concept. Not Being cannot be!
NO THING means, No Metaphysics, No Information, No God, No Laws of Physics, No Space, No Time, No Physics, No Matter No Antimatter, No Dark Matter, No Positive or Negative Energy, No Chemistry, No Bio-Chemistry, No Consciousness, No Robots (hardware or software), No Phenomena, No Noumena, NO EVENTS, on past, present, or future, nor parallel anything Multiverses! MORE Nothing destitute itself from existence as a concept, So Nothingness includes No NOTHINGNESS!!!

Your concept of Nothing is full of Something but i cant see what it is.

I think you got me wrong...my point was that the concept has only relative meaning in common-sense usage and has no place in ontological inquiry!

Or possibly the other way around.

My OP comment was addressing the video on 'Why is There Anything' (and by extension, it doesn’t mean anything just because there is).

So my comment was about 'Something'.
You seem fixated on making it all about 'Nothing'.