5
   

My documentaries, the documentaries that I recommend

 
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Oct, 2019 09:48 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 21 Oct, 2019 10:20 am
My introduction and probably a more complete assertive nuanced aproach to the previous debate above would be:
The Phenomena of reality and the Reality of phenomena.
...we got the soundbyte instead...
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2019 09:18 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 22 Oct, 2019 10:44 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Oct, 2019 09:34 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  2  
Reply Fri 25 Oct, 2019 09:34 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Fri 25 Oct, 2019 09:47 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sun 27 Oct, 2019 09:39 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Mon 28 Oct, 2019 09:24 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Wed 30 Oct, 2019 11:33 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Nov, 2019 03:21 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Nov, 2019 12:38 pm
Quote:
"...I do not know, I do not Know but..."

0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Tue 5 Nov, 2019 01:36 pm
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Thu 7 Nov, 2019 07:52 pm
0 Replies
 
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Nov, 2019 07:07 am
I can accept the possibility that there could be 'Something' (a metaphor for matter/energy/space/time) rather than 'Nothing' (no anything) for no reason at all. But then to extrapolate from that, the ability of 'Something' to self-organize itself into what we observe now, is a bridge too far.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Nov, 2019 01:24 am
0 Replies
 
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Nov, 2019 01:33 am
@Leadfoot,
He spoke on contingency and on causality, but in my opinion, both concepts are misunderstood in Ontology. Causality and Contingency make sense within Spacetime, outside, what you have is a perfect correlation, an Order of events that is timeless. From there its easy to conclude that Everythingness is a brupt fact and that Nothingness BY DEFINITION excludes itself from existence, it is a contradictory concept. Not Being cannot be!
NO THING means, No Metaphysics, No Information, No God, No Laws of Physics, No Space, No Time, No Physics, No Matter No Antimatter, No Dark Matter, No Positive or Negative Energy, No Chemistry, No Bio-Chemistry, No Consciousness, No Robots (hardware or software), No Phenomena, No Noumena, NO EVENTS, on past, present, or future, nor parallel anything Multiverses! MORE Nothing destitute itself from existence as a concept, So Nothingness includes No NOTHINGNESS!!!
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Nov, 2019 06:36 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Your concept of Nothing is full of Something but i cant see what it is.
Fil Albuquerque
 
  1  
Reply Sat 9 Nov, 2019 01:32 pm
@Leadfoot,
I think you got me wrong...my point was that the concept has only relative meaning in common-sense usage and has no place in ontological inquiry!
Leadfoot
 
  1  
Reply Sun 10 Nov, 2019 06:18 am
@Fil Albuquerque,
Or possibly the other way around.

My OP comment was addressing the video on 'Why is There Anything' (and by extension, it doesn’t mean anything just because there is).

So my comment was about 'Something'.
You seem fixated on making it all about 'Nothing'.
 

Related Topics

New Propulsion, the "EM Drive" - Question by TomTomBinks
The Science Thread - Discussion by Wilso
Why do people deny evolution? - Question by JimmyJ
Are we alone in the universe? - Discussion by Jpsy
Fake Science Journals - Discussion by rosborne979
Controvertial "Proof" of Multiverse! - Discussion by littlek
 
Copyright © 2019 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 11/16/2019 at 08:39:06