24
   

You need a license to watch TV in UK?!

 
 
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:06 am
@izzythepush,
we do enjoy the occasional dog , that is our secret vice. It goes so well with chanterelle sauce and a nice Gran Cru Pulligny Montrachet (I would prefer a 2011), myum nyum nyum nyum
Lash
 
  -1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:10 am
@centrox,
You taught us well.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:17 am
@farmerman,
Well, McG said that he knew about it - perhaps he forgot some details.
In England (and Wales) before a bailiff can be sent to a home, they must receive authorisation from the court or creditor. (Some creditors must get authority from the court, while others can issue it directly to the bailiff or enforcement officer themselves.)
The authority is in the form of a court order, warrant of control or writ of control.
The bailiff named on the warrant is the only person legally authorised to act on behalf of the creditor.
Quote:
Generally, most bailiffs can't force their way into your home or business premises to take control of your goods. There are some exceptions to this, which are:
- when the bailiff is chasing up unpaid magistrates' court fines
- when the bailiff wants to enter your trade or business premises to chase up unpaid county court judgements (CCJs) ) or High court judgements
if the bailiff has been given a court order allowing them to use reasonable force to enter your property to collect debts owed to HM Revenue and Customs
- when the bailiff has been given a court order allowing them use reasonable force to enter other premises where they believe you may have deliberately taken your belongings to stop them being seized.

In Scotland, it's done by a sheriff (sheriff officer). And as the name indicates, Sheriff officers are officers of the Sheriff court (who are employed by firms of sheriff officers or they are self-employed).
A sheriff officer can only come into a home if there is the correct authority from the court to do so.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:20 am
@farmerman,
I thought kimchi would be more fitting.
0 Replies
 
izzythepush
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:26 am
@farmerman,
Our bailiffs are mentioned in 12th Night, (although they're called something a bit different.)

Go, Sir Andrew: scout me for him at the corner the
orchard like a bum-baily:

0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 05:58 am
Quote:
Yellow-Light Crusader Fined for Doing Math Without a License

Mats Jarlstrom acknowledges that he is unusually passionate about traffic signals — and that his zeal is not particularly appreciated by Oregon officials.

His crusade to make traffic lights remain yellow longer — which began after his wife received a red-light camera ticket — has drawn some interest among transportation specialists and the media. But among the power brokers in his hometown, Beaverton, it has elicited ridicule and exasperation.

“They literally laughed at me at City Hall,” Mr. Jarlstrom recalled of a visit there in 2013, when he tried to share his ideas with city counselors and the police chief.

Worse still was getting hit recently with a $500 fine for engaging in the “practice of engineering” without a license while pressing his cause. So last week, Mr. Jarlstrom filed a civil rights lawsuit in federal court against the Oregon State Board of Examiners for Engineering and Land Surveying, charging the state’s licensing panel with violating his First Amendment rights.

“I was working with simple mathematics and applying it to the motion of a vehicle and explaining my research,” said Mr. Jarlstrom, 56. “By doing so, they declared I was illegal.


NYT
farmerman
 
  2  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 07:36 am
@revelette1,
he coulda been oing work on physucs, or balliatic jut S WELL. eXAM BOARDS FOR THE PROFESSIONS ARE JUST REVENUE GENERATORS .
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 08:54 am
@izzythepush,
Quote:
I think McG believes there's no such thing as the repo man in America. Nobody ever has to pay back a loan or rent because repossession just doesn't exist.

It seems you don't know the difference between a personal debt and a debt to the govt. I guess that comes from wanting to live in a place where there is no difference. When the state owns you, they can take everything you have and then make TV shows about it on govt owned TV. Does the UK still have debtors prison?
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 09:10 am
@nimh,
Quote:
When you make claims about how something "would never fly in America", those claims are up for discussion, no? I mean, when you've got practices like the police shaking down random drivers under the label of "civil forfeiture", which seems way worse than the licence fee thing, it seems odd to turn this into some kind of "you wacky Europeans, nothing like this would happen in America where we have guns" thing.

You are right, this is indeed a despicable practice here in the US. There are many instances of them taking people's money who had done nothing wrong. They have to get a lawyer, which costs money, and even if they do happen to win against the govt, in most cases they do not even get their full amount back.

The good thing is that as more and more Americans become aware of the practice the more people there are against it. There have even been a few court cases of the courts calling out the police and govt officials for doing this. I'm not sure what would come up with a google search for you, but when I looked up "civil forfeiture", the first page was mostly sites about ending it and not in support of it.
0 Replies
 
centrox
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 09:15 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
govt owned TV.

Britain doesn't have "govt owned TV".
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 09:26 am
@centrox,
centrox wrote:
Britain doesn't have "govt owned TV".
You are a party-pooper for the anti-UK crowd!
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 10:08 am
@centrox,
BBC?
centrox
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 10:20 am
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
BBC?

The BBC is neither state-owned or state-controlled. In addition, there are around 100 free-to-air digital channels that anyone with a TV and antenna capable of receiving the BBC channels can also watch, and none of these are owned by the government either. Plus lots more if you have satellite or cable.
McGentrix
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 10:26 am
Good discussion here, let's respond.

Nimh:
Quote:
You genuinely believe that Americans never get possessions seized when they can't or don't pay their debts? Or are you making some other distinction here?


Did I say or imply this? I don't believe I've discussed anything that happens or doesn't happen in the US other than people breaking into people's homes to steal possessions are liable to be shot. When Americans do not pay their debts, they get harassing phone calls or their service gets cut. For TV, most Americans have 3 choices, cable service, satellite dish or antennae. We'll leave online out of it for now and that is usually tied to TV service now.

If you miss a bill, you get sent a new bill with past due included. If you miss that bill, you receive a final notice plus past due. You miss again, you lose service. Then that gets attached to your credit rating. No one comes to your house to collect anything. You get that right?

This is how it is in most cases of debt in America.
Quote:
When you make claims about how something "would never fly in America", those claims are up for discussion, no? I mean, when you've got practices like the police shaking down random drivers under the label of "civil forfeiture", which seems way worse than the licence fee thing, it seems odd to turn this into some kind of "you wacky Europeans, nothing like this would happen in America where we have guns" thing.


America has a crazy war on drugs thing that has been going on for years and years now. I am no fan. Civil forfeiture (in most cases) in the cases you are talking about are due to the drug war. Assets believed to be purchased with money resulting from the selling of drugs can be legally taken by police and sold at auction to recoup money spent on investigations. I am completely opposed to this unless absolute proof can be demonstrated that such actually happened. I would be more than willing to participate in a thread on that matter. This thread is about the UK and the laws there.

Centrox:
You appear to be talking about yourself with your troll comment. That is the only way I could describe your last post.
Quote:
get their jollies picking arguments with complete strangers about some topic or other. It doesn't really matter what the topic actually is. They show many (or all!) of the characteristics of the classic web troll e.g. they pretend to misunderstand or deliberately ignore salient points,


That is EXACTLY what you did on your last post with your snide comment
Quote:
They are not coming to take your things for payment of the licence fee. They are coming to the door because you didn't pay the fine you got for breaking the law by watching TV without a licence, and holding out against the court, or ignoring it.
You knew exactly what I meant when I wrote
Quote:
Especially when you get people coming to your actual door looking to take your things for payment of a license fee...
. I am glad that you are man enough to admit doing so.

Farmerman:
In America, have you ever seen or heard of a cable TV company going into someone's home and taking property to be sold at auction to pay debt owed?

Quote:
Under federal law, those who are caught stealing cable can be criminally fined up to $1,000, imprisoned for up to six months, or both.

If the violation is willful and for commercial advantage or private financial gain, federal law allows for additional fines for the first offense up to $50,000 and imprisonment of 2 years, or both. For subsequent offenses, federal law provides for additional fines up to $100,000 and imprisonment of 5 years, or both.

A cable operator can also seek civil remedies or damages up to $10,000.
Under Massachusetts law provides for fines of up to $3,000, imprisonment for up to 2 1/2 years, or both for theft of cable services valued at less than five thousand dollars. Fines of up to $10,000, imprisonment up to 10 years, or both are provided for fraudulently obtaining services equal to or greater than $5,000 in value.


So, yes serious offense that should be taken seriously. Do you see in there anywhere that says someone will come and take your stuff?

Police are required to have a warrant to enter your home without permission unless they have articulable probable cause to enter or if a crime is being committed. For a cable TV infraction, a warrant should be easily obtainable if the cable TV company has evidence.

That you would say
Quote:
So you seem to be proud of the fact that you would not feel guilty were you to shoot a cop so he cant serve up a notice that you are suspected of theft of service. Is that your real point??
sickens me.

I've never said anything of the sort, nor have I implied anything of the sort. I'd appreciate an apology for that obscene and over the top comment.

What I said is that the reason what happens in the UK does not happen in the US is because the UK have had both their guns and their balls removed. The government controls their lives and they have lost any modicum of freedom they might have once had.

Out TV programming IS superior. Both US and UK have excellent programming options and both have made some very good shows. I don't think that really requires any convincing though. Most in the UK don't get to enjoy American TV because they are not free to. Ever wonder about that?




farmerman
 
  3  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 11:01 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
nor have I implied anything of the sort
Then I suppose you do not understand what you write, right?
McGentrix
 
  0  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 11:17 am
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
nor have I implied anything of the sort
Then I suppose you do not understand what you write, right?


I certainly do, but apparently you do not. Maybe you've been in the mines too long? Why don't you point out where I said or even implied that I "would not feel guilty were you to shoot a cop so he cant serve up a notice that you are suspected of theft of service."
farmerman
 
  5  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 11:59 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
Out(sic) TV programming IS superior.
.
There are individual programs that are. On the whole, though I disagree. Many of our shows are clearly there just to sell products ,so that entire episodes are just time in which to stick commercials separated by crap.

ALL news shows are geared to please, (or at least not piss off) their bases

Many , may US shows no longer concentrate on anything nearing quality .. For every Fargo, theres about 10 "ALIEN ADVENTURES". PS If you look at the really good nature shows (Soma my favorites), They are mostly BBC, Canadian, or NEW ZEALAND origin and production.

Most of our shows are geared to kids and hillbillies


farmerman
 
  5  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 12:04 pm
@McGentrix,
Quote:
I certainly do
Then your problems revolve around comprehension via repetition. You probably repeat the mantra that implies that "Americans have guns to protect them from constables" Any cop will find an armed American behind that door"

Repeating stuff like that implies one thing to me, and it aint some statement about freedom.Its implied violence.
Baldimo
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 12:06 pm
@centrox,
Quote:
The BBC is neither state-owned or state-controlled.

Who owns the BBC then if not the British govt? Who decides what programming gets played on the BBC? I found their page about "quotas and targets" for their programming. Seems pretty regulated to me.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tv/articles/who-we-are-how-we-commission
http://www.bbc.co.uk/commissioning/tv/articles/who-we-are-how-we-commission#quotas

Quote:
In addition, there are around 100 free-to-air digital channels that anyone with a TV and antenna capable of receiving the BBC channels can also watch, and none of these are owned by the government either.

It isn't free if you need a license to even receive the channels or you face the threat of govt goons coming to your house for stealing "free" broadcasts.

Quote:
Plus lots more if you have satellite or cable.

Does it still require a TV license if you have cable or Sat TV or do they come with the cable subscription?
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 1 May, 2017 01:19 pm
@farmerman,
farmerman wrote:

Quote:
I certainly do
Then your problems revolve around comprehension via repetition. You probably repeat the mantra that implies that "Americans have guns to protect them from constables" Any cop will find an armed American behind that door"

Repeating stuff like that implies one thing to me, and it aint some statement about freedom.Its implied violence.


You're mistaken me for someone else or trying to clump a bunch of people together to fit a mold you have in your head.

I don't repeat mantra's and I've never suggested, opined or implied that cops should be shot.

What I do say is that police need to obey the same law as everyone else and that the Constitution protects ALL American citizens and not just the ones with a badge.

The reason we have swat teams doing no knock raids at 2 in the morning is so they don't get shot. If you keep up on that type of news, there have been several incidents where police have been killed during no knock raids and the shooters found not guilty of a crime. Imagine if a cop, dressed in a police uniform and not tactical gear and jacked up on steroids, came to the door and simply asked questions. Instead of presuming everyone is guilty, instead, assume innocence until proven guilty.

Any cop SHOULD find an armed citizen behind every door because the rights of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Now, what I said earlier was that having bailiffs doing what they do in the UK would never fly in America. At least not in some parts. The reason for that is that American's have not given up their rights and freedom like the English have. But, like the English, most of these things that are done in the dark of night mostly happen to poor people, women and minorities. It's a very rare incident that you hear of a no knock raid happening in Beverly Hills. Same with TV License Fee seizures. Very rarely do you see that in the posh neighborhoods of London. It's the poor and single mom households that suffer.

Don't you find it at all odd that I am the one defending the poor and the minorities suffering at the hands of the government? Not a single liberal has even attempted to jump in and think it's wrong for a government to allow a private company to seize a person's goods to pay a fine for what should rightly be free.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Take it All - Discussion by McGentrix
Cancelled - Discussion by Brandon9000
John Stewart meets Bill O'Reilly - Discussion by Thomas
BEFORE WE HAD T.V. - Discussion by edgarblythe
What TV shows do you watch? - Discussion by Robert Gentel
Orange is the New Black - Discussion by tsarstepan
Odd Premier: Under the Dome - Discussion by edgarblythe
Hey, Can A Woman "Ask To Get Raped"? - Discussion by firefly
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.04 seconds on 04/18/2024 at 09:28:58