Excessive Force?

Then you're hitting kids and drunks and now bombing people...

What is your point?

I'm not even sure what your point here is anymore. You asked if the cop was using excessive force on the little girl in the video. Yes he is.
What is your point?

Excessive force refers to situations where government officials legally entitled to use force exceed the minimum amount necessary to diffuse an incident or to protect themselves or others from harm. This can come up in different contexts, such as when handling prisoners or even during military operations. When it involves law enforcement, especially during an arrest, it's also referred to as police brutality. The constitutional right to be free from excessive force is found in the reasonable search and seizure requirement of the Fourth Amendment and the prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment in the Eighth Amendment.

It is not the critic who counts; not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better.

The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly; who errs, who comes short again and again, because there is no effort without error and shortcoming; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who knows great enthusiasms, the great devotions; who spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement, and who at the worst, if he fails, at least fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who neither know victory nor defeat.

So, for example, in an ideal situation, an officer should use the following graduated methods to diffuse a situation:

Physical presence: Using his or her mere presence.
Verbalization: Using verbal statements, from non-threatening requests to direct orders.
Empty-Hand Control: Using physical bodily force through grabs, holds, punches or kicks.
Less Lethal Methods: Using weapons such as a baton, chemical sprays, Tasers, or police dogs.
Lethal Force: Using lethal weapons such as firearms.

In order to be considered reasonable and compliant with the Constitution, whenever force is used (the last 3 methods), it must stop when the need for the force ceases, for instance when a suspect is successfully restrained or a situation has otherwise de-escalated. An officer is not allowed to punish criminals no longer posing a threat.

Along with deferring to a law enforcement reasonableness standard, courts can also grant officers qualified immunity. This protects public officials from civil liability for violations of rights so long as they were reasonably performing their duties and the rights involved were not "clearly established." In excessive force cases, qualified immunity can protect police officers in more ambiguous situations where there is a "hazy border between excessive and acceptable force."

Anyone remember Sgt Calley and the My Lai "massacre" back in the Nam era.

Got to give the sob credit, he knows how to play the 12 year old U S mentality.