Lash
 
  1  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2017 05:12 pm
@InfraBlue,
InfraBlue wrote:

I'm a roman ******* candle, ************.

This is just an awesome quote.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Mon 10 Apr, 2017 05:14 pm
@McGentrix,
When ya just keep doublin-down on your fuckin lies, ya don't "clear the air." On the contrary, it just puts ya in so deep in a hole that ya aint never gunna come up for air. If I was gunna get buried, I'd at least try to keep from doin the diggin my own damn self, ya know?
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 01:25 am
@McGentrix,
Great work, McGentrix. You presented a political opinion piece, published in the New York Times Sunday magazine, as a Times news article.

That is a conservative for you. Just can't see the difference between factual reporting and political opinion.
layman
 
  -3  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 04:46 am
@Blickers,
Nice try, cheese-eater. Gent did no such thing.

Let me guess though: Your personal opinion is that Rice has not lied to the American people once, eh?

Chump.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 05:24 am
@McGentrix,
Quote:
“She did not explain that Syria’s declaration was believed to be incomplete and thus was not fully verified — and that the Syrian government still attacked citizens with chemical weapons not covered by the 2013 agreement. Instead she claimed that "We were able to get the Syrian government to voluntarily and verifiably give up its chemical weapons stockpile.”

But from the start of the deal, there were discrepancies in Mr. Assad’s weapons declarations.” That’s terrifying, given Rice’s involvement in the Iran nuclear deal which relies on similar reporting by a terror state.


Naive people might just chalk this up to Obama, being the chump that he is, just getting played again. But that wasn't the problem. Obama knew better, he was just trying to play the American public, calling on his reliable designated liar, Lyin Susie, to accomplish the task.



0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 10:16 pm
Nothing to see here liberals, there were never any FISA warrants for Trumps team during the election...

Report: FBI granted FISA warrant to surveil ex-Trump aide Carter Page

Quote:
The FBI obtained a warrant to secretly surveil former Donald Trump aide Carter Page last summer under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), according to a Tuesday Washington Post report.

The FBI and Justice Department demonstrated probable cause that Page is acting on behalf of a foreign state in order to be granted the warrant.

The FISA warrant was part of the FBI’s investigation into possible ties between Russia and Trump campaign associates, law enforcement and U.S. officials told the Post.

“This confirms all of my suspicions about unjustified, politically motivated government surveillance,” Page told the Post Tuesday. “I have nothing to hide.”


The White House, FBI and Justice Department declined the Post’s request for comment.

This report indicates that the FBI believed Page was in touch with Russian officials during the 2016 election.

House and Senate Intelligence committees both have ongoing investigations into whether Trump associates worked with the Kremlin in an attempt to help Trump win the election.

Page has been at the center of speculation about links between Trump aides and Russia because of his ties to the country and a trip to Moscow in July.

Page and the White House have denied all allegations of improper communications.

The government has not formally charged Page with any wrongdoing, and it is unclear if the Justice Department plans to do so.

The Washington Post first reported last week that Page admitted that he met with a Russian spy in 2013, but the former Moscow-based investment banker denies any wrongdoing with regard to Russia and the Trump campaign.

Trump identified Page as a foreign policy adviser in the spring of 2016 to the Post, but campaign spokeswoman Hope Hicks later told the paper that Page had an “informal” role.

A FISA warrant is granted for a 90-day span, and this one was renewed more than once, officials told the Post.

FISA grants are given sparingly, quietly, and require the approval from top Justice Department and FBI officials.

The FISA application for Page laid out in a lengthy testimony claims about how he may be linked to the Russian government or an agent who is carrying out clandestine actions for the Kremlin, an official told the Post. A crime does not need to be committed in order to receive a warrant. But information obtained through a FISA warrant could be used in later prosecution.

The warrant application also reportedly claimed Page was in communication with other Russian agents whose identities have not yet been publicly disclosed, in addition to his contacts that have already been reported.

The FISA reveals that the FBI and Justice Department both worked to uncover Russian ties to the election as early as July, an official told the newspaper.

Page reportedly was the only U.S. citizen that the government directly surveilled in 2016 through a FISA warrant as part of the government’s Russia probe.

Page raised concern among foreign policy experts for publicly and effusively praising Russian President Vladimir Putin and criticizing U.S. foreign policy towards Russia. In July, Page traveled to Moscow to deliver a speech on the topic.

The Post reports that the FBI and the Justice Department felt reluctant to use a FISA warrant on campaign figures during the election because it could lead to intercepted communications regarding political campaign strategy.

Obtaining a FISA warrant to surveil foreign diplomats, however, is much more common. The Post reported the FBI used a FISA warrant to listen to Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak’s conversations with Gen. Michael Flynn, Trump's former national security adviser who was ousted after details of the talks became public.


I doubt Blatham will "attend" to this, so don't rely on him telling you about it.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 11:22 pm
@McGentrix,
See what your lily-livered, shitting your pants fear has allowed "your government of the people, by the people, for the people" to do to you silly sheeple, McGentrix.
0 Replies
 
Blickers
 
  2  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 11:22 pm
@McGentrix,
I sure hope that there was a FISA warrant out on this guy, he was playing footsie with two convicted Russian spies and turned documents on the oil business over to them. The fact that the FISA warrant was renewed at least once more means that a judge was convinced that enough evidence had been uncovered by the first warrant that another one was merited. Apparently carrying on a willing business type relationship with Russian spies trying to recruit him was not all Page was doing, there was more. And this guy was the fellow Trump mentioned when asked who he considers his foreign affairs advisor.

Trump is filling his Administration with Russian sellouts and people who are just months off the Kremlin payroll. Disgusting.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Tue 11 Apr, 2017 11:26 pm
@Blickers,
Run run everyone run, the commies are coming the commies are coming!
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 07:13 am
@Blickers,
Blickers wrote:

Trump is filling his Administration with Russian sellouts and people who are just months off the Kremlin payroll. Disgusting.


First of all, that statement is so much crap. Who are they?

Secondly, you're OK with this then because it's Trump? Will you also be OK with this when the next Democrat becomes President? Imagine how ingrained the FBI and other intelligence agencies will with Republican agents.

layman
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 08:13 am
Page helped the FBI file charges against 3 russian agents, one of whom was given a 2 1/2 year sentence. They said at the time that Page didn't know they were spies and had done nothing wrong.

Yet now the MSM tries to insinuate that he's a russian spy because they tried (and failed) to recruit him. It seems they posed as bankers, and such. Page worked for Merrill Lynch is Moscow for many years, and was interested in pursuing investment opportunities in Russia. They didn't tell him they wanted him to spy for them, they were just trying to develop a relationship with him in the hope he might later inadvertently disclose something of value to them.
0 Replies
 
InfraBlue
 
  3  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 09:19 am
@camlok,
They're not commies anymore. They've substituted fascistic authoritarianism for the totalitarianism that they once pursued.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:06 am
@InfraBlue,
Quote:
They've substituted fascistic authoritarianism for the totalitarianism that they once pursued.


Slightly harsh, but a good overall description of the US.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:14 am
@camlok,
camlok wrote:

Quote:
They've substituted fascistic authoritarianism for the totalitarianism that they once pursued.


Slightly harsh, but a good overall description of the US.

The US does not have an authoritarian government.
camlok
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:23 am
@InfraBlue,
That is laughable. They run roughshod over their sheep like citizenry with wild abandon.
InfraBlue
 
  2  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 01:43 pm
@camlok,
Its law enforcement institutions do have authoritarian tendencies, but on the whole the government is liberal in regard to individual freedoms.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 01:52 pm
While I realize that you are free to do so, I'd be darn appreciative if Camlock's posts were neither quoted nor responded to in this thread. He adds nothing to the conversation and we do not need the disruption.
girlie
 
  -3  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 01:56 pm
@McGentrix,
What's your access to "evidence" - articles from Facebook that anyone can get? You shouldn't believe everything you read on the Internet in your favor. Silly, liberals. I'd only trust unbiased news sources.
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 02:06 pm
@girlie,
girlie wrote:

What's your access to "evidence" - articles from Facebook that anyone can get? You shouldn't believe everything you read on the Internet in your favor. Silly, liberals. I'd only trust unbiased news sources.


First, go and actually read what was written and then come back and comment like a responsible adult.
0 Replies
 
camlok
 
  0  
Reply Wed 12 Apr, 2017 02:12 pm
@McGentrix,
See what your "open-minded" conservatives want, girlie. That's exactly the close-mindedness you are railing against.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
GAFFNEY: Whose side is Obama on? - Discussion by gungasnake
 
Copyright © 2021 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.09 seconds on 09/21/2021 at 11:18:44