JOhn KERry do you really support him?

THINK INK.

If taxes, the economy and Iraq aren't enough to tip the balance, maybe undecided voters should look carefully at the handwriting of President Bush and Sen. John Kerry.
Or so says handwriting expert Sheila Kurtz, who calls herself the "chief graphology officer" of Pilot Pen Corporation.

"I call it brainwriting," Kurtz told Lowdown yesterday. "It's not really your handwriting. Your thoughts start in the cortex of your brain, and they travel down your nerve endings to wherever you hold the pen. It gives marvelous clues to personality."

Dubya's handwriting, said Kurtz, has "open O's and A's, slants to the right and has 'tenacity hooks' - a hook at the end of the letters."

The hooks mean that "once his mind is made up, he tends to stick to his mind-set," Kurtz said. "His approach to ideas is neither deep nor probing - we call them surface writers, surface thinkers."

She added: "He sometimes has what we call 'needlepoint letters,' and that means he can pick up information, but his single-mindedness draws him back."

Kerry's scrawl, on the other hand, "has downstrokes that are very strong. Occasionally, some letters intertwine with the next row of writing. When that happens, it's better for a person like this to take one idea, check it off and then move onto the next. It's not that he's flip-flopping, it's that he has a lot of ideas."

So which candidate is Kurtz signing on with?

"After I did this analysis, I was sure - but I won't put it into this article. If you feel Kerry comes out stronger, well, those are the traits that I found


The handwriting expert is spot on.
Bush, shallow and stubborn

Kerry, Thoughtful reasoning and intelligent.

So, 62 posts later, did anyone profess a deep belief in Kerry?

Yeah...several people!

Weren't you here?

McG
Stay awake and keep up with the program.

A couple. It did make me feel a little better.

John Kerry is the most liberal senator in office, even moreso than Kennedy or Clinton.

He's a horrible candidate, a knee-jerk nomination from a party that has lost its center, and its ability to govern.

Even if that were true...all of it...

...he still would be an infinitely better choice than the incompetent moron now in the office.

And it isn't even true!

Which part isn't true?

The first sentence is a statement of fact.

The second sentence is MO of him.

I went back and counted, we have 3 and one who would vote for satan.

You people say liberal as if it is a curse. Maybe I should remind you that Liberals and democrates gave us Social Security, Medicare, Unions and all the social programs that we take for granted.
That said better a Liberal than that religiously driven freak in the White House.

He is trying to make a point, you keep with the program. You were the satan voter not Kerry suporter.

Thanks Cannistershot.

You are right, another reason that I don't like liberals they take my money and give it to someone else so they don't have to work. Thank you liberals!

Bwaaaahahahahahahah! Now that's funny!

Again Better Satan than his disciple Bush. No use going to the middle man.

Oh never mind. It's not worth it.

He is not the most liberal senator in office...even if some organizations want to paint him that way.

He is not a horrible candidate...he is a reasonable, intelligent, deep thinking individual who is proving to be a much more forbidable candidate than the moron and his handlers expected. In fact, so much so...that he is going to win.

He is not the product of a knee-jerk nomination. He entered primaries and won the right to be the candidate.

Nor has the (Democratic) party lost its center or its ability to govern. The center is still there (and energized)...and during the next four years, you will see that they CAN govern.


But... in fairness to cj...he/she did get all the capitalizations correct...and almost all of the spacing between words.

cjhsa wrote



No wonder you are voting for Bush. :wink: