John Kerry - Hero........................................not

Why do you hate babies so much that you would sacrifice them for medical research?

Why do you hate babies so much that you would sacrifice them for medical research?

Oct. 12 - I wonder if President Bush could look into the eyes of Christopher Reeve's family and tell that that it's because he values life so deeply that he is preserving clusters of cells in freezers?-cells that resulted from in-vitro fertilization and could be used for embryonic stem cell treatment?-despite the fact that more people will die as a result of his decision. I wonder if he could stare into their grief and defend the fact that he has released only a few lines of stem cells?-lines that are basically useless because they have been contaminated. Or brazenly point out that he has authorized funding for adult stem cells?-which do not hold the same miraculous potential as embryonic stem cells.

The sad fact is, the president probably could. After all, Laura Bush went on national television during the week of my father's funeral and spoke out against embryonic stem cell research, pointing out that where Alzheimer's is concerned, we don't have proof that stem-cell treatment would be effective. It wasn't too long after that interview that she gave a speech in which she chided people for offering "false hope" to the families of Alzheimer's patients. In a sweetly patronizing tone, she said it's terribly unfair to all of those who are vulnerable and in pain to suggest that a cure is just around the corner.

Memo to Mrs. Bush: I am one of those poor, vulnerable souls who you think has been misled. I speak for many others when I say that none of us believe a cure is just around the corner. We believe it's around a very wide bend, which we can't get around because your husband has put up a barrier to further research. And as far as false hope, there is no such thing. There is only hope or the absence of hope?-nothing else.

Christopher Reeve understood that. He knew that everything begins with hope. His vision of walking again, his belief that he would be able to in his lifetime, towered over his broken body. His tireless work, his commitment to help turn stem-cell treatment into a reality revealed a courage that was molded out of fire and pain and tears. It was unbreakable. It was huge. It transcended paralysis. With that courage, he did more than walk; he soared. Many of us learned a valuable lesson about hope from a man whose life changed dramatically on a single afternoon. We learned that it's limitless, that it's as real as you allow it to be.

Even if the Bush Administration had flung open the gates to stem-cell research years ago, we would not be at the point of offering treatment today. Christopher Reeve would still have been taken from us. But we would be closer. Other people who are confined to wheelchairs or imprisoned by illness would have more hope. Scientists would be working feverishly to turn this miraculous cure loose on the world. Because they have families too. They have loved ones and friends, and they value them more than clusters of cells that will only ever be clusters of cells. With each day, each month, each year that passes more people will die. We will look at names, at lives, and we will be left with the sad truth that many of them didn't have to die.

Some people, when they die, leave so much life behind that we wonder how they did it. How did a man paralyzed from the neck down find the strength, the reserve, the energy to do so much in these past years? People who never met Christopher Reeve were emboldened by his crusade; they were infused with faith and confidence, where before things had looked terribly bleak.

He said in an interview a few years ago that when he dreamed, he was never in a wheelchair. In his dreams, he walked and ran and sailed on the sea. He is doing all of that now?-far beyond this world and the body that wouldn't allow him those freedoms. He's left the rest of us with a responsibility?-to never let anyone stop us from one of the most towering medical achievements in history. To never let anyone call our hopes "false."

I think Lash continouosly forgets that Bush has to be against something FIRST before he is for it.

And that is the most telling characteristic regarding the idiot savant in the Oval Office.

Dookiestix wrote:

I think Lash continouosly forgets that Bush has to be against something FIRST before he is for it.

And that is the most telling characteristic regarding the idiot savant in the Oval Office.

You mispelled Kerry there. Thats K-e-r-r-y, not Bush. Oh, and he isn't in the oval office, he's justs a senator.

The BBC's Paul Reynolds in Washington says the move is a break from the total opposition Mr Bush expressed during the election campaign, but is the most restricted one he could probably have taken given his pro-life position.

He wasn't against the 911 Commission. He just wanted to make sure it wasn't a bunch of Democrats on a witch hunt and that the survivors' families wouldn't be unduly traumatised. They gathered info and set parameters before going forward with approval.

President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11.

Mr. Bush said the matter should be dealt with by congressional intelligence committees.