A Lone Voice wrote:Hey, DTOM, how's things?
doin' okee dokee, alv. ya awright?
A Lone Voice wrote:Interesting comparison with H. Clinton and Arnie. You're right; I have to laugh when my peoples bang their fist in support of the Hatch bill just 'cause Arnie wants to be president. But, both sides have done that often enough, I guess.
yup. me guess so too. and to honest, ahnold might be kinda okay.
if he carried out his stated goal of " socially liberal, fiscally conservative" riff. seems like the beat of both worlds to me.
A Lone Voice wrote:My issues with H. Clinton have to do more with her (at the time) running for the Senate in NY based on her husband's success. That is irrelevant now, as she has had time to build her own persona and reputation. Just like Arnie. :wink:
well, yep. my homies from my nyc days think she's doin' okay for them. out here, on the left coast, time's too short to tell about ahnold. ( but gawd... you should see the way my friend's (from dusseldorf) eyes go absolutely berserk when i do my "cal ee forn ee ahh" speech... hahahaha.
so far, he hasn't done anything to totally tick me off. but i really wish he'd stop using tag lines from his movies to make a point.
A Lone Voice wrote:Scoates posed a compelling question. I was a McCain supporter in the 2000 Repub primaries,
i was actually hoping that he'd be the rep. candidate. i might have voted for him instead of gore. oh, wellll....
A Lone Voice wrote:And I respect McCain enough that his endorsement of Bush this year reaffirms my support of a Bush reelection.
mack had no choice. support bush or die a political death next election. but, alv, don't you find it interesting that mccain and kerry are buddies?
[quote="A Lone Voice"This is another sign of both sides being more interested in obtaining/keeping power then the good of the country..[/quote]
damned straight dude. that's why it's important to constantly remind them all who they work for. reps and dems have to stay on their cases. otherwise, they get fat and sassy and start believing their own spiel.
A Lone Voice wrote:But what were the Dems thinking with nominating Kerry? I truly think this election for liberals is strictly about throwing Bush out instead of having any excitement about their candidate.
well, alv,... i'm not so sure that it's "just about liberals" being unhappy with bush. my parents aren't "liberals"; they remind me of that everytime i talk with them. lol!! but neither is none too happy with the state of things.
for myself? i got interested in kerry when he came back at delay on patriotism. i said to myself; "self, what we need is an ass kicker". dean had a lot of good things to say, but basically i did not envision him making it to the final down. kerry, i felt, had a chance of taking my fight to the end zone. and i think he's gonna do it. bush has too many traditonal republicans pissed at him for a landslide. young and old alike, that i know and talk with, are not into the bush doctrine on anything.
A Lone Voice wrote:It would have been fascinating to watch this election if it would have been Bush vs Dean. Dean was actually pretty attractive in the eyes of many conservatives in some of his issues,
what??? really ??? i have never heard any of my con friends say that. all they have said to me is "anti-war freak!!!". but man, if ya got something for me, give it up! this i've gotta hear!
A Lone Voice wrote:It will be intriguing to see how it all shakes out.....
yep. at the very least...