JustWonders wrote:If I were Arafat, I'd want Kerry too. Bush dropped the ball there.OCCOM BILL wrote:Actually Soz, I'm still not 100% certain. I really resent the Democratic Party for putting up Kerry. I don't want to vote for Bush... but I almost feel like I have to.
O'Bill.... Putin wants Bush, while Arafat prefers Kerry....just a thought.
Putin's endorsement doesn't make me feel warm and fuzzy either. He's still KGB-like and outside of his strong response to terrorist attacks, I find little to respect him for. Give me a Yeltsin or Gorbachev any day.
I think Iran's lying their asses off. They want Kerry, but know their endorsement would be a negative.
How did Bush drop the ball in regards to Arafat? I remember Arafat thugs started the bombing all over again and Arafat wasn't doing anything to control them. Once he lets his attack dogs loose, he didn't have a way of reigning them back in.
If that is the case then no US president has any chance of bringing peace to Israel unless they side with the rest of the ME in the destruction of Israel. I don't see that happening any time soon.
Did I mention that NK supports Kerry for president?
LMAO! I'll bet!
Baldimo wrote:Nonsense. Israel could give up that little bit of land without being "destroyed". If it were up to me, the United States would compensate the Israelis for the "realities on the ground in exchange for them getting the hell off it... and I'd only offer nicely once. Israel gets their dough back... Palestine gets their precious land back and the United States gets some respect back.If that is the case then no US president has any chance of bringing peace to Israel unless they side with the rest of the ME in the destruction of Israel. I don't see that happening any time soon.
Baldimo wrote:Did I mention that NK supports Kerry for president?
