2
   

Charges rejected against Michael Moore

Forums: Politics, Michael Moore
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
Acquiunk
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 04:02 pm
You can tell the degree to which Moore is hitting home by the level of vitriol coming from the supporters of those he targets.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 04:22 pm
Dookiestix wrote:
McGentrix:

I offered several letters from soldiers in Iraq who are seeing the truth of the war and are speaking out.

Are they idiots? There are many who have also seen Michael's movie. Are they idiots? Did you read the article?


I guess the truth will be known, now. Moore is going to be exposed for what he really is.

FahrenHYPE 9/11 now available in stores!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 05:34 pm
The number of books and films, all of them financial flops, made in retort to "F 9/11" are just more examples of how much fear has been instilled in the right wingnuts.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 05:37 pm
Desperation. Pure and simple. I'm amazed at the amount of crap being thrown from the neoconservative corner that fails to gain any traction.

As Bush and Cheney have an obvious aversion to the truth, it can be assumed that this latest screed against Michael is more of the same.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 05:40 pm
Just watched the trailer and clip of the week.

What a crock of ****.

"Michael Moore is collaborating with the terrorists?"

Oh GOD that rich!!!

Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 05:48 pm
...and the "big" documentary hasn't made it into any theaters but is already being sloughed off by Overstock.com as surplus.
0 Replies
 
blueveinedthrobber
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 05:51 pm
perhaps they can watch it on the bush home theater in Crawford to pass away those frosty winter nights come February....
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 06:09 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
...and the "big" documentary hasn't made it into any theaters but is already being sloughed off by Overstock.com as surplus.


It could be that the left wing media including Hollywood doesn't want any one going up against their crowned price of crap!
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 06:14 pm
Lame.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 06:19 pm
Quote:
It could be that the left wing media including Hollywood doesn't want any one going up against their crowned price of crap!


Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing Laughing

A better guess is that not NEARLY as many people are willing to see THIS piece of crap.

Otherwise, wouldn't you think all those patriotic Americans who can't stand Michael Moore would be lining up to see this film?

Including you?

Besides, who the hell would believe the crap from Zel Miller's mouth? The guy is insane.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 06:22 pm
Yep -- what happened to Murdock or Disney? Was the "film" ever offered for distribution? Zell Miller and that distinquished actor Ron Silver whose last stint was on a failed sitcom.
0 Replies
 
Baldimo
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 07:27 pm
Lightwizard wrote:
Yep -- what happened to Murdock or Disney? Was the "film" ever offered for distribution? Zell Miller and that distinquished actor Ron Silver whose last stint was on a failed sitcom.


I guess that is the point. While conservative actors don't so well in Hollywood as compared to liberal actors just shows that the point about liberal Hollywood is true.
0 Replies
 
PKB
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 07:37 pm
McGentrix wrote:
"increases his stature and popularity" with who? The idiots that feed off his teat aren't going to suddenly not like him, and those that already despise his grotesque distortions will continue to know hime for what he is.


Wha---? Oh, you are referring to enthusiastic Bush supporters. Gotcha! :wink:
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 09:22 pm
Quote:
I guess that is the point. While conservative actors don't so well in Hollywood as compared to liberal actors just shows that the point about liberal Hollywood is true.


Maybe conservative actors don't do so well in Hollywood because they SUCK.
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Fri 8 Oct, 2004 11:10 pm
Sure, Ron Silver is so talented an actor -- he identified himself BTW on Bill Maher's show as a liberal Democrat until 9/11 but now a Bush propagandist because of supporting the war. It is a habit of second rate actors becoming conservative politicians, now isn't it? Ahnold's career was waning -- he hadn't make a movie in a decade that made money so he must have been putting out to get all those parts. Yes, even "Terminator III" which failed at the box office to make its cost.
0 Replies
 
Victor Murphy
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 06:46 am
[Moderator: broken image link removed]

Kym Worthy, Wayne County Prosecutor


The DA's a woman, ugly, but still a woman. She'll never have any balls!
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 06:57 am
Dookiestix wrote:
Quote:
I guess that is the point. While conservative actors don't so well in Hollywood as compared to liberal actors just shows that the point about liberal Hollywood is true.


Maybe conservative actors don't do so well in Hollywood because they SUCK.


Republican actors hesitant to express views

Tom Selleck, Bruce Willis, Arnold Schwarzeneggar, Charlton Heston, Ronald Reagan... Yeah, the reason is they suck... uh, huh. Rolling Eyes
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 09:48 am
You just blasted away Baldimo's theory. Next.
0 Replies
 
Dookiestix
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 10:12 am
Hee, hee. Yep. So much for liberal Hollywood, huh? :wink:
0 Replies
 
Lightwizard
 
  1  
Reply Mon 11 Oct, 2004 10:21 am
Yes, and so much for the actors who did become politicians being great actors. Ronald was relegated to mostly B movies and Ahnold's movies haven't made money since over a decade ago with "True Lies" (which I liked). It's noteworthy that RR's only big role in "King's Row" had script changes he demanded to supplant any idea that the character was homosexual thereby disembowling the theme of the novel.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » Charges rejected against Michael Moore
  3. » Page 3
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.88 seconds on 05/03/2024 at 06:00:05
▲ ▼