192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Mon 17 Apr, 2017 10:55 pm
@layman,
Heh, I read that and thought it was in line with what they'd publish.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  7  
Mon 17 Apr, 2017 10:59 pm
So Trump called to congratulate Erdoğan hours after the Turkish president claimed a narrow victory in a contested referendum that will grant him sweeping new powers. (International observers monitoring the Turkish referendum concluded in a preliminary report on Monday that the campaign and vote took place in a political environment where the “fundamental freedoms essential to a genuinely democratic process were curtailed”.)
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Mon 17 Apr, 2017 11:41 pm
@Walter Hinteler,
The US state department had earlier noted as well that there were "irregularities on voting day".
But the "cleansing of all state institutions”, what Erdoğan promised and already did, the sacking or detaining tens of thousands, and closing media outlets - that seems to be okay as long as he is seen by Trump as an important ally against Isis.
hightor
 
  6  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 02:46 am
@blatham,
This really pisses me off. The Rice lynching party was a clear example of an opportunistic "let's-change-the-subject" program comprised of lies, smears, and innuendo. There was a veritable cottage industry producing ominous warnings and chiding commentary. We saw a lot of it right on A2K with a special thread devoted to the subject. Most of the attacks were based on hearsay, rumors mined from right-wing media, or sheer fiction, most of it written in that tone of breathless triumphalism which characterizes so many of Trump defenders. They'd already embraced an alternate narrative that Rice, criminal of Benghazi, was headed for the gallows. I could quote from the thread in question extensively; but you can go through it yourselves. I did include this tidbit from an author you'll all be sure to recognize:

Quote:
For some damn reason, the shrill cries and denials of the cheese-eaters has not made this whole scandal just magically disappear, eh?

They shoulda thought a little further ahead when they were demanding investigations into russian connections, eh? Too late now, chumps.


Yeah, okay boss, anything you say.
Olivier5
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 05:23 am
@georgeob1,
georgeob1 wrote:
A population density about 3.3 times that in the United States makes public transport a good deal more efficient. Beyond that the only thing that distinguished France is that about 80 % of their electrical power is supplied by Nuclear reactors, compared to about 28% here.

The US has high density population areas, eg on the East coast. A high speed train from Miami to Boston via DC and NYC would be profitable, same between Austin and Dalas.

US houses are badly insulated, and consume humongous energy for heating. That could be easily fixed with legislation and/or tax incentives.

There's plenty you guys could do, if you gave a flying rat's arse about your kids and grand kids...
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 05:26 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:

Which is why they should take the global lead on CC.

What Trump is now unravelling ain't called the "Paris agreement" for nothing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 06:05 am
@hightor,
Quote:
This really pisses me off. The Rice lynching party was a clear example of an opportunistic "let's-change-the-subject" program comprised of lies, smears, and innuendo.
And Rice as target is just one of many examples of the modern right using such means for political advantage. Some politician or operative or agent pushes it out, the rightwing media echo it, and then the base (long primed to buy into such stuff) buy it, as Layman did.

And as most of us recognize, this whole modern right wing media enterprise is very profitable. It is now an industry.

And Trump is making all of this much worse. He is without integrity or any sense of the societal values of truthfulness so he utilizes these devices on a near daily basis, further degrading standards of evidence and norms of behavior. It's very depressing.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  5  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 06:11 am
Quote:
President Trump’s promise to enact a sweeping overhaul of the tax code is in serious jeopardy nearly 100 days into his tenure, and his refusal to release his own tax returns is emerging as a central hurdle to another faltering campaign promise.
NYT
No one with an undamaged brain stem wants this administration to overhaul the tax code because we know who is going to benefit and who is going to be disadvantaged. But if a primary barrier to them getting this actually done is Trump's own real world tax behavior, that would be a fine thing.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 06:32 am
Quote:
As he nears 100 days in the White House, Mr. Trump has demonstrated that while he won office on a populist message, he has not consistently governed that way. He rails against elites, including politicians, judges, environmentalists, Hollywood stars and the news media. But he has stocked his administration with billionaires and lobbyists while turning over his economic program to a Wall Street banker. He may be at war with the Washington establishment, but he has drifted away from some of the anti-establishment ideas that animated his campaign.

...Even some of Mr. Trump’s friends worry that he has gotten away from the policies that fueled his success in the campaign. “He ran as a populist but so far has governed as a traditionalist,” Christopher Ruddy, chief executive of Newsmax Media, said. “They might break out and do some more populist stuff, but I wouldn’t call his presidency so far populist.”
NYT
Imagining that Trump's version of "populism" was anything but a scam was seriously delusional. There just no history of him giving a rat's ass for the well-being of the majority of American citizens. Nor is there any history of him working to do anything that might help towards a better-educated and more self-empowered electorate. His use of "populist" rhetoric was and is totally cynical. To see him behave as he has been since taking office is going to surprise only a crowd of people who are, apparently, delighted in the thoughtlessness of personality cult membership.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 06:51 am
Speaking of cynical politics, the Times has a very good piece up right now on the internal debates the Trump administration is having on the Paris Accord. And my wager is that they will not withdraw from the Accord but will reduce to near zero their participation in any effective policies which might do damage to energy industries' profits and power.

The decision to remain in the accord and the decision to disconnect that (for world public-consumption) position from any meaningful changes in the power structure of the US will be completely cynical. That's why they'll do it. And then they'll craft a cover story which will be deceitful top to bottom to try and avoid international penalties and yet while trying to convince their base that they have just given the shaft to "elites" and "those know-it-all
Europeans". NYT
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:02 am
Steven Colbert does Alex Jones. Yes, it is very good.
Link Here NYT
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:29 am
This might be my very favorite contemporary news item.

1) Trump supporters assault protesters at Trump rallies
2) Two assaulted protesters file suits against those who assaulted them and against Trump for encouraging such behavior
3) Two white nationalists who were involved in the assaults advance the defense that the victims have this right BUT that they aren't responsible because Trump DID encourage violence.
That story here at WP

We'll recall that Trump said in an interview after an incident when a protester was roughed up, Trump said, "Maybe he should have been roughed up". In another, he said, "If you see somebody getting ready to throw a tomato, knock the crap out of them would you. Seriously. Just knock the hell out of them. I promise you, I will pay for the legal fees. I promise. I promise." In another, Trump said in the good old days, protesters would be carried out on a stretcher and "I'd like to punch him in the face, I'll tell you". In another, "OK, get him out. Try not to hurt him. If you do, I'll defend you in court. Don't worry about it". There's more and the Times has many of the videos here
So, here's a situation where I'm rooting for the victims of the assaults to win their court case and for the white nationalists to win there's too.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:34 am
Echoing what I said earlier, Dana Milbank writes...
Quote:
Trump’s no populist. He’s a swamp monster.
See what President Trump has been doing since taking office
WP
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:39 am
@blatham,
Just knock the hell out of Trump. I will pay for the legal fees. I promise.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:44 am
Good going, Mr Populist and Promise-Keeping president! Seriously!
Trump has spent one out of every five minutes of his presidency in Palm Beach
WP
The cheese-eating Frenchies think they had it right at Versailles but Trump is showing them a thing or deux! Believe me!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:46 am
@Olivier5,
I like the cut of your foc.

Permit me to contribute, please.
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:48 am
From the Latham Family Secular News Service...

Grand nephews very delighted this weekend with the Spring-time Eggs left about the yard by the Equinox Bunny.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 07:53 am
Shhhh. Don't tell anybody...
Quote:
Benghazi-obsessed Trump MIA on key security post
After criticizing Hillary Clinton relentlessly, the president has yet to nominate a State Department official charged with keeping diplomats safe.
Politico
...because people might conclude that Trump and modern Republicans are full of ****. After all, it's really not too tough to get to that particular conclusion.

Edit: And I see that Benen has a piece up on this and other failures to make appointments for State. Benen
This is a rather curious phenomenon. Prior GOP administrations have had well-manned and active State Departments. And Tillerson himself is completely out of the norm as regards a head of this department. So what is to account for the present disdain?

My supposition here is the influence of the Koch machine in this administration (all that counts is corporate profits particularly as regards petroleum), the influence of Bannon (internationalism is a false god and diplomacy mostly delusional), the bleak and near total lack of relevant education in Trump himself and finally, the consequences of a years-long campaign to denigrate Hillary Clinton and the entire State Department
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 08:22 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Steve Benen has a great column on this now. It's well worth reading in full.
Quote:
Trump is now the only leader in the Western world to congratulate Erdogan on the election results, effectively endorsing the outcome and extending the imprimatur of the United States government on democracy’s slow demise in Turkey.

...There’s no great mystery about Trump’s motivations: the White House wants Turkey’s help in Syria. But the U.S. president didn’t have to go quite as far as he did in touting the results, which had the unfortunate effect of reminding the world of Trump’s affinity for authoritarian rulers.
Benen
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Tue 18 Apr, 2017 08:29 am
Read this. Ezra Klein is smack on the money here.
Quote:
The most interesting policy argument in America right now is the debate between conservatives’ real position on health care and their fake position.

The fake, but popular, position goes something like this: Conservatives think everyone deserves affordable health insurance, but they disagree with Democrats about how to get everyone covered at the best price. This was the language that surrounded Paul Ryan and Donald Trump’s Obamacare alternative — an alternative that crashed and burned when it came clear that it would lead to more people with worse (or no) health insurance and higher medical bills.

Conservatives’ real, but unpopular, position on health care is quite different, and it explains their behavior much better. Their real position is that universal coverage is a philosophically unsound goal, and that blocking Democrats from creating a universal health care system is of overriding importance. To many conservatives, it is not the government’s role to make sure everyone who wants health insurance can get it, and it would be a massive step toward socialism if that changed.

This view provided the actual justification for Ryan and Trump’s Obamacare alternative — it’s why they designed a bill that led to more people with worse (or no) health insurance and higher medical bills, but that cut taxes for the rich and shrank the government’s role in providing health care.
More here from Vox
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.45 seconds on 11/26/2024 at 08:46:21