192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
giujohn
 
  -1  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 09:33 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

Quote:
China rejects North Korean coal shipments, buying American instead

The Chinese are returning shipments of coal back to the rogue nation. Following repeated missile tests that drew international criticism, China banned all imports of North Korean coal on Feb. 26, cutting off the country’s most important export product.

China is now going to import American coal. If North Korea has lost China, then it is probably close to the time when North Korea tells Dear Leader, “So long, farewell!”


http://legalinsurrection.com/2017/04/china-rejects-north-korean-coal-shipments-buying-american-instead/

Trump knows how to cut a deal, sho nuff. This will be great for American miners, and will put N. Korea on it's last legs, all in one fell swoop, eh?



Fat dumb ass and asshat Assad are on their way out...It's a done deal... Something Obammy couldn't pull together if ya gave him another 8 years.

Next up...The assahola of Iran.

Man...I'm just itching to nuke one of these shitheads, ya know?
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 09:46 pm
@giujohn,
Quote:
Next up...The assahola of Iran.


Exactly, John. Another punk-ass bitch whose bluff will soon be called.
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 09:53 pm
@layman,
Seein as how they're shite, which is only about 10% of the muslim population surrounding them, Iran aint gunna git much support from homeboys. Their greatest support was from Obama, who tried to sell out U.S. interests.

But, guess what, Iran? Obama aint prez no more, so you're fucked now.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:07 pm
@Baldimo,
Baldimo wrote:
If not politics, did you expect climate change to become religions new Jesus?
No, I neither did nor do. Nor does abortion, or marriage, or education, or ... ... ...
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:14 pm
@giujohn,
Quote:
POSTED: 07/02/09, 12:01 AM EDT

LAST month, hundreds of thousands of Iranians took to the streets to protest a rigged presidential election. Our president was extremely cautious in his initial criticism of the Iranian government's fierce crackdown against the protestors. At first, President Obama said that the United States -- given our history in Iran -- should not be "meddling" in the country's internal affairs.

Finally, as both the crowds in the Iranian streets and violence against them increased over the next several days, Obama conceded that he was "appalled" at the clerics' repression.

Unfortunately, Obama's policy is a lose/lose proposition that will please neither side in Iran. Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, isn't going to suddenly embrace the U.S. because of Obama's more charismatic approach, much less stop subsidizing terrorists and developing a nuclear arsenal.

Meanwhile, authoritarians in China, North Korea, Russia, the Middle East and South America may draw two conclusions: One, the United States does not much care much what other regimes do to their own people. Two, a new America will overlook almost anything in order just to get along with these authoritarians.


http://www.morningjournal.com/article/MJ/20090702/NEWS/307029971

These totalitarian theocrats don't even have majority support in their own damn country.
RABEL222
 
  3  
Wed 12 Apr, 2017 10:22 pm
@blatham,
Quote:
And that axiomatic formulation is used by both types (1) and (2) above.


Which explains why the U S of A is very close to a becoming another Nazi state.
NSFW (view)
Olivier5
 
  6  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 12:26 am
Gee I really miss Obama. The guy was a saint, compared to the fat pig now sullying the white house.
layman
 
  1  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 02:42 am
@Olivier5,
Of course you love Obama, Ollie. All Frogs do. He specialized in cowardice, retreat, and surrender.
izzythepush
 
  2  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 03:24 am
@thack45,
The only problem with Spicer is he's a complete idiot who thinks the rest of the World is as stupid as he is, which is why he screws up all the time. He started his tenure as a laughing stock, and may be ending it as a bumbling almost Holocaust denier.
0 Replies
 
Olivier5
 
  2  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 03:40 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
He specialized in cowardice, retreat, and surrender.

America has this addiction to cowardice. GW deniers for instance are scared little cowards, afraid of the truth, and no country has more of them than the US... Why is that? And all the cyber spying and all this Muslim banning, that's born out of visceral, primal fear of the "other". Even Trump's election is a symptom of fear: the fear of falling backward, of not being "great" (aka white) anymore. You guys have become a permanently scared nation.

Booh!
hightor
 
  6  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 04:29 am
For a while I've suspected that much of Trump's performance can be seen as a long-anticipated response to having been mocked by Obama at that White House Correspondent's Dinner in 2011 — I could really imagine him simmering and stewing in rage, vowing revenge. I've suggested this before, probably some thirty pages ago in this thread. So I was interested to see this:

Quote:
Every Day is Opposite Day

There’s a misconception that Donald Trump reversed course when he ordered a missile attack on the Syrian airbase from which Assad’s chemical attack was launched. In reality, Trump remained on the same course he’s been on since the earliest days of his candidacy.

Yes, he ran as an anti-globalist who repeatedly called for the US to stay out of the Syrian conflict. And yes, just days ago his administration made it quite clear that removing Assad was no longer America’s policy. But these policy positions are not what drives Donald Trump. He answers to a higher calling, and in terms of that calling, his decision to order the attack on the Syrian airbase was entirely consistent.

Trump’s ultimate motivation is to do the opposite of Obama. And he never veers from the course.

In 2013, Assad launched a chemical attack. Obama did not answer with a direct military response. In 2017, Assad launched a chemical attack. Trump did what he always does. The opposite of Obama. As Politico’s Susan Glaser explains: “When faced with a choice, the best way to understand what Trump will do is to expect he will opt to differentiate himself as much as possible from his predecessor.”

Obama first days in office were spent attempting to heal a growing rift with Muslim countries. Trump’s were spent on a bizarre and wildly unnecessary Muslim ban. Obama got healthcare passed. Trump put all his political capital on the line in an effort to repeal it. Of course he didn’t have a reasonable alternative ready to replace Obamacare. It’s not the new policy he cares about. It’s all about undoing the old one. It’s about being the unObama.

Obama had a particulary bad relationship with Netanyahu. Obama did not get along at all with Putin. Trump reached out to both of those leaders with extreme vigor.

Trump’s executive order binge represents his signature (and arguably, only) achievements during his first eleven weeks in office. And each of those orders had one, and only one, ideological commonality. They undid what Obama did.

Obama was America’s first black president. Trump picked Jeff Sessions to be his attorney general. Seeing the trend?

It’s not about destroying the environment, denying science, being anti-choice, or wanting fewer people to have healthcare. It’s an obsession with being the opposite of Obama.

Think about it. The guy is against clean air and water and for coal. Even coal people aren’t as pumped about coal as Trump.

In one of his administration’s sickest international displays (and that’s saying something), Trump’s initial response to Syria’s chemical attack was to blame Obama and to describe the incident as a “consequence of the past administration’s weakness and irresolution.” Even in his brief remarks announcing his Syrian strike, Trump couldn’t resist contrasting himself with his predecessor. “Years of previous attempts at changing Assad’s behavior have all failed and failed very dramatically.”

We’ll see if putting a few dents in a largely abandoned airfield changes Assad’s behavior. I hope it does. But one thing I’m sure of is that it won’t change Trump’s. The world’s most unpredictable leader will maintain one area of total predictability. He’ll try to be the opposite of Obama.

And sadly for America, thus far he’s been able to achieve that goal.


Dave Pell
snood
 
  4  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 04:45 am
@hightor,
Yup. And the unspoken, largely denied motivation a lot of his otherwise sane followers have for voting for and supporting Trump is animus against Obama. Logic be damned - issues, we don't care about no steenking issues. Is he not doing what Obama did? That's all they care about.
layman
 
  -1  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 05:11 am
@snood,
snood wrote:

Yup. And the unspoken, largely denied motivation a lot of his otherwise sane followers have for voting for and supporting Trump is animus against Obama. Logic be damned - issues, we don't care about no steenking issues. Is he not doing what Obama did? That's all they care about.
To assert that anyone who doesn't want to see Obama's mistakes repeated is "insane" and totally devoid of logical analysis just proves what a pompous, condescending cheese-eater YOU are, eh?
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 05:55 am
Here's a relevant contemporary event if you're interested in the post-Trump election, Sanders / Establishment Democrat political imbroglio.

A Sanders Dem came within 6 points of beating an incumbent GOP dude in a very red Kansas district.

The DNC and DCCC refused to help the progressive even after he had momentum. A CLEAR sign they intend to try to choke off progressives from the party.

http://observer.com/2017/04/thompson-estes-special-election-kansas-democratic-party-progressives/

Expect a devastating DEMEXIT.

Good news for Republicans in the short term.

I do expect actual progressives, independents, some Greens, and eventually thinking middle class Republicans will form the party for the people.
0 Replies
 
Lash
 
  1  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 06:21 am
Another special election trying to capitalize on anti-Trump sentiment.

This one, Establishment Dem, nurtured by the crooked geriatric party.

Ossoff.

https://www.google.com/amp/www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/can-this-democrat-win-the-georgia-sixth/amp

The mayor of Roswell said something so crushingly sad during his interview for this article. Paraphrasing, he said that Ossoff's name would likely ensure his loss. Older residents would ask themselves, 'is that Muslim?' or some other devalued ethnicity? Name recognition, he said. I never thought about 'name recognition' as being code.

Are people so ******* lazy that they won't actually find out about the people running for office?

blatham
 
  3  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 06:45 am
@ossobucotemp,
Quote:
That was a flea market in Texas?

Lots of them, actually. The Canton market (about two hours from Dallas) is huge, open one weekend a month. If you want to buy a crucifix made from plywood, melmac and bullets, that's where you want to go shopping. We had a lot of stock left from our store in Portland so we got rid of most of it at such venues. Horrible way to sell stuff (the logistics/labor) but I got to meet and talk with a bazillion Texans, city and country dwellers. that part was great.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 06:55 am
@revelette1,
From the piece you linked
Quote:
If he fires Bannon, Trump should prepare for war. The information warfare architecture Bannon built with the money of Robert and Rebekah Mercer is already restive and nervous that Trump has been co-opted by (((them))) and lured into being a more conventional president.

Yup. No small problem. Fox will stay loyal but that Bannon crowd are more akin to old style anarchists with their cartoon bowling-ball bombs.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 07:00 am
@Finn dAbuzz,
Quote:
Everything is relative, but there is absolutely no reason to think we are remotely close to an armed conflict with Russia.
Yup.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Thu 13 Apr, 2017 07:03 am
@Olivier5,
Quote:
Gee I really miss Obama. The guy was a saint, compared to the fat pig now sullying the white house.
You're definitely not alone in that sentiment. A lot of Republican strategists are now speaking of their fears of losing the House in a year and a half.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.88 seconds on 11/29/2024 at 10:29:50