@oralloy,
Quote:I disagree. He clearly believes that he legitimately won and is being cheated.
Trump doesn't have ever appeared to have accepted defeat in his life, regardless of realities. And he clearly articulated he would not accept defeat prior to this election, declaring he had (essentially) already won prior to the election, and any loss could only be fraudulent and would be challenged in the courts. People lie to themselves all the time, and this particular scenario is quite in keeping with his never accepting defeat, and his pre-emptive statements...that is to say it is quite meaningless to say 'he clearly believes'. For him, it is essentially the same as 'he wants to believe'...
And wanting to believe something is not reason to attempt to coerce an outcome...which he is clearly attempting to do in that phone call.
If he was only trying to obtain the legitimate votes that were not given to him, then:
- he would want a conversation on solid ground (but he is relying on rumour)
- he would ask why the Georgian Secretary of State disagrees with him (but he's not interested in that)
- he would provide evidence (but he only provides rumours)
- he would ask for an actual recount, and give the basis (but he goes '
say you recounted')
- he would ask for the actual number of legitimate votes he didn't receive (instead he asks for specifically, 11780 votes)
- he would have heard them say the dominion machines weren't moved (but it wasn't what he wanted to hear)
- he would have not changed his story (after Trump said he heard rumours they'd been moved, and was told they weren't, he then said 'well what about the internals')
- he would have asked for people with a long history of proven integrity to do the recount (but he asks:
'find people who want to find answers, and not people who don't want to find answers')
- he wouldn't have threatened criminal suits against the GSOS (particularly after the GSOS says he's found no evidence. The conversation again, should have been about what evidence / information the GSOS has)
The above are behaviours of people with honest beliefs who also want to be fair and legitimate about their claims...but Trump exhibits none of those types of behaviours.
Again - it is very, very clear to me what he was trying to do.
In contrast, the GSOS seemed to be a man of integrity. He didn't back down to being threatened and bullied, he remained calm, he talked about the facts as he knew it (but wasn't further asked about them), and didn't change his story. He didn't bite on rumour mongering. He didn't seem slippery, weasley or anything. His whole decorum was one of a man of integrity - one who is intimately familiar with, and comfortable with, the actual facts.