192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Forums: Politics, Trump, American Politics
Email this Topic • Print this Page
 
 
ossobucotemp
 
  2  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 02:51 pm
@blatham,
Hey, it's ossobuco, an italian word. I take it that in Germany and elsewhere, it's ossobucco (gah! that reminds me of busting broncos).

This just to add a level of superfluous noise to these proceedings.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 02:53 pm
@McGentrix,
Keep calm now, McG. There is on-going reporting on this now and there'll be lots more. As Pence now informs us, the WH loves a free and independent media doing its job.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 02:56 pm
@blatham,
It's a good thing the media is doing their jobs now, but where were they the last 8 years? If only they fact checked Obama half as much as they fact check Trump, we might actually trust the media.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 02:57 pm
@blatham,
But did you actually read the article that you "attended to"? Can you honestly say that it actually says anything of any importance? It's conjecture, it's guessing, it's lying. It's like something you'd see on Alex Jones and you and I both know what that means.
McGentrix
 
  0  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 02:58 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Keep calm now, McG. There is on-going reporting on this now and there'll be lots more. As Pence now informs us, the WH loves a free and independent media doing its job.


You mean the WH loves a free and honest media doing its job.
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:01 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

But did you actually read the article that you "attended to"? Can you honestly say that it actually says anything of any importance? It's conjecture, it's guessing, it's lying. It's like something you'd see on Alex Jones and you and I both know what that means.


I don't think he EVER reads the full article. He reads the headline, and if it makes Trump sound bad (as it invariably does with the rags he cites), then he might skim down looking for a damning sentence or two to cut and paste.

Time and time again I have read articles he has cited, only to see that the facts presented in that very article belie the misleading headline that he relies on.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  2  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:02 pm
@McGentrix,
Yes, I read it (though not the earlier piece Josh notes he'd written on Slater). I'll highlight just to help out.

You probably should go back to reread the first two sentences:
Quote:
After writing last night's post on the various adventures and crimes of Felix Sater, something occurred to me. This is not a reported claim but a possibility to consider in light the information that has now emerged.
ossobucotemp
 
  2  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:04 pm
@blatham,
I found the photo combo - for anyone else who hasn't seen it, it's on page 506.

On the Trump photo, I read somewhere that he is wary of stairs. In this case, I can see his point as I'm wary of them too, vision/balance reasons.

I don't take that as misogyny going on. Could be, may well not be.

3 of those people are in better shape than Trump.
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:04 pm
@McGentrix,
Trump loves "honest" more than anything. It's like a middle name. He's known far and wide as a sort of Saint of Factuality.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  3  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:06 pm
@ossobucotemp,
As I said, it was a cheap shot for me to post that. But of course it isn't as if we don't have prior evidence of Trump regarding women as acccessories for his dick.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:06 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Yes, I read it (though not the earlier piece Josh notes he'd written on Slater). I'll highlight just to help out.

You probably should go back to reread the first two sentences:
Quote:
After writing last night's post on the various adventures and crimes of Felix Sater, something occurred to me. This is not a reported claim but a possibility to consider in light the information that has now emerged.



So you posted it knowing that it was fiction, ok then. Why? It adds nothing to your blog, in fact it just distracts from it. It's "noise" that makes it appear that you might have something against our fine President, Donald Trump.
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:07 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Yes, I read it

Quote:
After writing last night's post on the various adventures and crimes of Felix Sater, something occurred to me. This is not a reported claim but a possibility to consider in light the information that has now emerged.



Funny I didn't notice that bolded sentence in the post he made to start all this **** with, did you, Gent?
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:08 pm
@layman,
layman wrote:

Funny I didn't notice that bolded sentence in the post he made to start all this **** with, did you, Gent?


Nope.
0 Replies
 
McGentrix
 
  0  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:11 pm
@blatham,
blatham wrote:

Yes, I read it (though not the earlier piece Josh notes he'd written on Slater). I'll highlight just to help out.

You probably should go back to reread the first two sentences:
Quote:
After writing last night's post on the various adventures and crimes of Felix Sater, something occurred to me. This is not a reported claim but a possibility to consider in light the information that has now emerged.



Looking at your link, I do not see that sentence.

This is the byline and first paragraph:

Quote:
ByJosh MarshallPublishedFebruary 19, 2017, 10:53 PM EDT
48933
Views

As I noted in my previous post, I've been keenly interested in Donald Trump's association with Felix Sater going back to last Spring. I also knew he had been an FBI informant and leveraged that status to dramatically reduce his sentence in a major financial crime. I didn't realize until this evening that there were more details about this part of the story in the public domain than I'd realized. It's rather mind-blowing.


He then proceeds to speculate and lie for awhile.
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:12 pm
@McGentrix,
Do you have any evidence they are not honest?
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:13 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

So you posted it knowing that it was fiction, ok then....makes it appear that you might have something against our fine President, Donald Trump.


"Appear?"

Not much different than every other post he has made here, actually.

Any semblance of the "appearance" of some impartiality on his part was dissipated a long, long-ass time back, eh?

Commie-ass mofo.
McGentrix
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:14 pm
@layman,
That was a joke. Hopefully it is received as such.
McGentrix
 
  -2  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:

Do you have any evidence they are not honest?


Go watch some Alex Jones for a couple hours and get back to me.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -1  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:18 pm
Leave it to a commie like Blathy to take fake news and make it even fakier, eh?
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -2  
Mon 20 Feb, 2017 03:19 pm
@McGentrix,
McGentrix wrote:

That was a joke. Hopefully it is received as such.


Yeah, I knew it was. I just figured I'd use it to present a more serious point, ya know?
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
AMERICAN CONSERVATISM IN 2008 AND BEYOND - Discussion by Foxfyre
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
Fellow Bostonians: How many of us wished we had an assault weapon last night? - Question by maxdancona
What should be first on the agenda of the winner in November? - Discussion by Frank Apisa
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
  1. Forums
  2. » monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events
  3. » Page 514
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 11/05/2024 at 09:31:15
▲ ▼