monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

BOMBSHELL REPORT Finds 400,000 Pennsylvania MAIL-IN BALLOTS SUDDENLY APPEARED AFTER ELECTION NIGHT

As Texas sues alleging MASSIVE CONSTITUTIONAL VOTE INSECURITY VIOLATIONS by multiple key swing states in the 2020 election, another damning piece of evidence of voter fraud has come to light, And, once again. it is in Pennsylvania.

A report submitted by Representative Frank Ryan in Pennsylvania and co-signed by 14 other Pennsylvania State Representatives allege 400,000 mail-in ballots suddenly appeared in the public record the day after the election.

According to their filing, which is now known as the "Ryan Report," this incredible inconsistency in election reporting, in addition to more than 50,000 ballots with same-day delivery or before and 23,000 whose arrival dates pre-dated when they were sent, led them to conclude:

Actions by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court and secretary of state in the 2020 general election were so fraught with inconsistencies, documented irregularities, and improprieties (see filing below) that the election results for the office of president of the United States cannot be determined. The actions were so flagrant and egregious that I am a plaintiff in a case in the Commonwealth Court against Gov. Tom Wolf, et al. to seek relief.

One of the levels of this proof is that the election commission stated they mailed 2.7 million ballots on their website, but then after election day, that number magically changed to 3.1 million, meaning 400,000 BALLOTS suddenly appeared the following day of the election.

The Ryan Report states:

In a data file received on November 4, 2020, the Commonwealth’s PA Open Data sites reported over 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out. The CSV file from the state on November 4 depicts 3.1 million mail in ballots sent out but on November 2, the information was provided that only 2.7 million ballots had been sent out. This discrepancy of approximately 400,000 ballots from November 2 to November 4 has not been explained.

This apparent discrepancy can only be evaluated by reviewing all transaction logs into the SURE system to determine the access, authority for the entry, the verification of the data entered as well as the authentication of the security certificates of the sites from which the data had been entered.

This is huge news. If true, it could potentially mean 400,000 ballots are completely fraudulent. Couple this with the report's findings that tens of thousands of votes were apparently received before they were sent, and a real voter fraud case begins to build that warrants a true audit of Pennsylvania's votes.

To late, won't play - Safe Harbor day has come and gone. Fraudulent, zombie court cases no longer work! They never really worked for anything but taking up peoples time to quash them.

When the history of President Trump’s failing effort to overturn the 2020 election results is written, there will be many bogus claims to chew on. But more than any other, one is emerging as the epitome of bad faith, poor research and our inability to rid our political discourse of a patent falsehood.

For more than a month now, Trump and his allies have been peddling a seemingly devastating anomaly in the election results: that Joe Biden underperformed Hillary Clinton’s 2016 showing in every metro area in the country except four — Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee and Philadelphia. The fact that those four cities just happen to be in the decisive states could sure lead one to draw some conclusions.

And it has. Over and over again, the claim has been broadcast by Trump, his aides and his media allies. Some have held it out there as merely suspicious; others, like Trump, have flatly called it evidence of fraud.

The only problem is that it’s demonstrably ridiculous.

[... ... ...]

The data are clear, though, and there is no improbability. If anything, the data show Trump’s performances in the key metro areas lagged behind most others.

To this point, the claim has been debunked not just by mainstream outlets, but also by Rove and two of those who played a major role in initially spreading it. None of that has deterred those who want to believe it — or at least would very much like you to believe it — from pressing forward. But that fact that they have been so willing to propagate this bogus and roundly rejected claim is certainly a commentary on their ability or desire to actually parse the various voter fraud claims that are out there.

As he so often does, CNN's John Avlon puts his finger on the problem we're facing today.

"In the five weeks since election day, it often feels like we're having a debate in a hall of mirrors," he said.

"President Trump trying to overturn an election, while saying he's protecting election integrity. Death threats leveled at election officials by people who accuse them of doing violence to our democracy. And now, an uptick in civil war rhetoric, chapters as what was once known as the party of Lincoln. Last county, the Dane County GOP held a rally at the Wisconsin state capitol they promoted by saying, 'Our nation is on a path to civil war.'

Yesterday, the Arizona state GOP sent out a tweet asking followers if they're willing to die in the effort to overturn election results. This is aggressive defensiveness and dangerous nonsense. But what makes it worse is that so many of Donald Trump's supporters have bought into the big lie. They've been misled into believing they're fighting for the very virtues they're being used to attack. And here's how it works, starting at the top of the disinformation chain.

I am determined to protect our election system, which is now under coordinated assault and siege. We will restore honesty and integrity to our elections and we will restore trust in our system of government.

"The opposite is true. Our election system is under siege, but from Trump and his league team. And no president has done more to erode trust in our system of government than Trump with his refusal to respect the election. But Trump's alternate reality gets amplified on hyperpartisan media. Check out these graphics from 'Hannity' the other night, demand transparency and fight for Trump. Well, Lou Dobbs and Stephen Miller stoke each other's outrage over a banner which read, 'Trump campaign fights for free and fair elections.'

"If you only listen to right-wing echo chambers, you might believe it all. So you go to a rally and hold a sign that says, 'Defend democracy', or 'stop the steal,' or 'stand for truth.' These are admirable emotions, but they don't fit the objective reality of what you're actually fighting for. Without knowing it, you bought into what Abraham Lincoln once called the wolf's dictionary.

Back during the real Civil War, Lincoln agonized that both sides believed they were fighting for liberty -- yes, even Confederates that were fighting for slavery under the cloak of state's rights. He addressed the problem in a parable, that when the wolf drives the sheep, the wolf denounces him as the destroyer of liberty, especially if the sheep was a black one. The wolf and the sheep have very different definitions of liberty.

"But as the war raged on and some border states voted to abolish slavery, Lincoln said that the wolf's dictionary can be repudiated. We need to repudiate the wolf's dictionary today. That means insisting that facts matter and words have real meaning, or to use a favorite conservative refrain, facts don't care about your feeling. So the judges that have said that Trump's lawsuits have no basis in reality. If you say you believe in the rule of law, you need to respect the rule of law. If you say you're a proud patriot, then put country over party.

coldjoint wrote:

Wait... now you’re saying people should not wear masks?

Trump's votes still in the billions, or are they all the way up into the trillions now? Seems like you find a half million 'bombshell' ballots every other day.

Well, some person's/persons' devotion to Trump pits them against democracy, history – and reality.

As he so often does, CNN's John Avlon puts his finger on the problem we're facing today.

It’s Time For Mass Civil Disobedience Against Lawless Lockdown Orders

By now it should be obvious that elected state and local officials issuing COVID-19 lockdown and stay-at-home orders are just making things up as they go along.

Too often, their edicts aren’t based on science or data, but on a grotesque understanding of their own authority and infallibility. In the face of a worsening pandemic, they want to be seen doing something, taking bold action to stop the spread of the virus—that is, so long as it doesn’t hurt certain favored special interests.

That’s why Americans living under arbitrary and unconstitutional lockdown orders should simply ignore them, en masse, as an act of civil disobedience.