monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

John Hopkins University updated the article with a note from the editor:

Quote:

John Hopkins University updated the article with a note from the editor:

The editor is part of the media that is lying. Next.

coldjoint wrote:

Quote:

John Hopkins University updated the article with a note from the editor:

The editor is part of the media that is lying. Next.

Do you ever read any bad news that you believe? I ask because it seems that as long as you like the news it’s true, but if you don’t like the news, you say it’s fake.

Lol

You are one lost, pitiful mofo.

New Lawsuit Asks Wisconsin Supreme Court to Declare All Drop-Box Ballots Illegal and Block Certification

A new lawsuit filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court seeks to block the state from certifying the election results, arguing that all ballots cast via drop boxes are illegal and should be discarded, and if such ballots cannot be reliably identified for rejection, then the state legislature should nominate its own slate of presidential electors.

The lawsuit complaint, filed on Nov. 27 on behalf of Wisconsin voter Dean Mueller (pdf), argues that the Plaintiff’s right to a “safe, free, secure and transparent presidential election” was violated “in that his vote has been diluted by the counting of thousands of illegal votes placed in illegal ballot drop boxes across the State of Wisconsin.”

The suit says over 500 ballot drop boxes were installed in 72 counties in the state in violation of the law, arguing the Wisconsin Elections Commission (WEC) did not have the authority to approve their use. The commission’s endorsement of drop-box use amounted to enacting a new elections law, the suit argues, noting that the U.S. Constitution accords such power only to Congress or state legislatures.

“By doing so, the WEC gave the newly created voting process of using ballot drop-boxes, the imprimatur of legality,” the suit states. “But these ballot drop-boxes are part of a procedure and process that was never created through legislation by the Wisconsin legislature. By leaving election officials in all Wisconsin Counties the impression that the use of ballot drop-boxes was legal, members of the WEC violated Wisconsin election laws and encouraged county clerks to do so, also,” it added.

Further, the lawsuit argued there may have been “one-sided partisan teams retrieving un-mailed and un-postmarked ballots from illegally placed ballot drop-boxes,” which combined with “an alleged gross ‘relaxation’ of Wisconsin voter ID laws” undercut election integrity and was “a recipe for voter fraud.”

“With all of these allegations and facts considered together, there is now a cloud of suspicion over the whole election process in Wisconsin,” the suit argued, and called on the Supreme Court to reject all ballots submitted through drop-boxes.

However, identification of ballots cast via drop boxes may not be possible, with Urban Milwaukee reporting that Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall-Vogg said on several occasions ahead of the election that clerks had no way to mark ballots returned through drop boxes. It is unclear how many ballots were cast via drop-box in Wisconsin.

Hinting at the likely impossibility of identifying ballots returned via drop-box, the suit noted: “If the drop-box ballots were not segregated so that they could be identified to a legal certainty and removed, then the Petitioner asks the Wisconsin Supreme Court to nullify the results of this whole election in Wisconsin and notify that the legislature that it must choose 10 Electors” who would cast presidential votes.

The suit also asks the high court to block state certification of the election, scheduled for Dec. 1, until the merits of the case can be heard, and wants the court to declare the use of ballot drop-boxes in Wisconsin illegal.

This is the second contest-of-election lawsuit filed with the Wisconsin Supreme Court, with Republicans filing one on Tuesday, calling for the rejection of more than 156,000 ballots.

A recount in Wisconsin’s most-populous county, requested by President Donald Trump’s campaign, ended Friday, with Democrat Joe Biden gaining 257 votes to Trump’s 125. Dane County is expected to finish its recount on Sunday. Pre-certification results show Biden in the lead by over 20,000 votes.

After the recount concludes, the Trump campaign is expected to mount a legal challenge to the overall result in Wisconsin.

Lol

You are one lost, pitiful mofo.

snood wrote:

Lol

You are one lost, pitiful mofo.

I believe she is legally mental impaired. Needs help badly!

BillW wrote:

snood wrote:

Lol

You are one lost, pitiful mofo.

I believe she is legally mental impaired. Needs help badly!

I have said countless times I am a male. Since you know nothing about being a man, you can call me whatever you want. Anything else?

coldjoint wrote:

BillW wrote:

snood wrote:

Lol

You are one lost, pitiful mofo.

I believe she is legally mental impaired. Needs help badly!

I have said countless times I am a male. Since you know nothing about being a man, you can call me whatever you want. Anything else?

Oh wow, see what I mean, doesn't even know what gender she is..............

The lack of success of True the Vote’s efforts to challenge the outcome appears to mirror that of the president himself, whose team has lost 38 court actions since the 3 November election, most recently in Pennsylvania where a federal appeals court panel blasted Trump’s legal team for filing a case with no merit.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/28/trump-donor-election-fraud-sues-money-back

Quote:

The lack of success of True the Vote’s efforts to challenge the outcome appears to mirror that of the president himself, whose team has lost 38 court actions since the 3 November election, most recently in Pennsylvania where a federal appeals court panel blasted Trump’s legal team for filing a case with no merit.

Are Trump supporters saying the above is wrong? Or that the courts got it wrong? Or that the courts, and everyone else that disagrees with them are corrupt?

Other sources appear to agree with the above:
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/10/933112418/the-trump-campaign-has-had-almost-no-legal-success-this-month-heres-what-they-ve
https://time.com/5908505/trump-lawsuits-biden-wins/ Of course they were from the first page of searches, and are a few days old. But I continue to see no evidence of fraud, and plenty of courts saying the election was largely well run (largely as in around 99%).

A federal appeals court in Pennsylvania has delivered a strongly worded repudiation of Donald Trump’s latest attempt to overturn his presidential election defeat, dismissing his challenge to the state’s results as without merit, and backing a district judge who likened the president’s evidence-free and error-strewn lawsuit to “Frankenstein’s monster”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/27/trump-voter-fraud-lawsuit-rejected-pennsylvania-court

PBS reported yesterday that President Trump has lost yet another legal round in his bid to challenge the election results. See YouTube video.

Here's The Guardian report:

Quote:

A federal appeals court in Pennsylvania has delivered a strongly worded repudiation of Donald Trump’s latest attempt to overturn his presidential election defeat, dismissing his challenge to the state’s results as without merit, and backing a district judge who likened the president’s evidence-free and error-strewn lawsuit to “Frankenstein’s monster”.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/nov/27/trump-voter-fraud-lawsuit-rejected-pennsylvania-court

Old news. A judge in PA gave Trump a huge win today. She said what PA did with mail in votes is probably unconstitutional. You are not informed.

coldjoint wrote:

Old news. A judge in PA gave Trump a huge win today. She said what PA did with mail in votes is probably unconstitutional. You are not informed.

Couldn't you see what is new and what is old? Your news was released on Nov.5 (NY Post), and mine Nov.27 on PBS and Nov.28 on The Guardian.