monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

who's a douche bag?

The trump court cases keep getting thrown out because the "seorn depositons" arre so amorphous theyh don
t cpimt as ecodemce. amd ;awyers admit they don't prove fraud. P\ure bullshit, joint.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-cries-election-fraud-in-court-his-lawyers-don-t/ar-BB1aZ2QK?ocid=msedgdhp

They are called affidavits. And they are evidence. They are taken under the penalty of purgery. Every time you post you show me, and others, how little you know.

I don't know, you?

You swearing something is true in an affidavit does not make it true. It merely means you claim or think it's true. Judges disregard sworn affidavits if they can't be shown to be true, and many in the trump cases can't be counted as evidence because they aren't proven. They are, in a word, only opinion. It's your grasp of the law that's shaky.

The same applies to the media. What they say does not make it truth.

News flash evidence is used to prove something, it is not proven it is examined. Again you display your ignorance. At least you are consistent.

Something is cited as evidence in a case. It is examined and can't be shown to be true. It is thrown out as evidence. Picked any other nits lately?

see? baseless trumpian bullshit, as had been said all along


www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/federal-prosecutors-assigned-to-monitor-election-malfeasance-tell-barr-they-see-no-evidence-of-substantial-irregularities/ar-BB1aZLeD?ocid=msedgdhp

Sure, feel free to quote me

Not you, from Biden Schumer or Pelosi asking for a complete audit of the computer software in the election. An investigation that would leave no doubt of Biden's victory. I'll wait.

She knew who you meant to get quotes from. She just enjoys making you bite at things obvious to everyone but you.

This shows how much of a stupid ass you really are, the statement was rhetorical! I truly think your about 12 years old at times like this! Now give me one of your 12 year old stupid ass replies.

That does not change the fact she said she could produce quotes. BTW, I consider anything from you irrelevant. It is usually gossip or trolling, and yes, any 12 year old could see that too.

A little different than the corrupt media. OANN has more credibility.
https://www.oann.com/ga-to-complete-election-audit-by-next-week-amid-fraud-claims/

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/justice-alito-speech-polarizing-issues-prompts-calls-reform/story?id=74194553&cid=clicksource_4380645_1_heads_hero_live_twopack_hed

Justice Alito speech on polarizing issues prompts calls to reform Supreme Court

Justices typically don't talk about issues actively before the Supreme Court.
ByDevin Dwyer
November 13, 2020


Justice Samuel Alito set off fresh calls for Supreme Court reform on Friday after delivering a highly opinionated speech to a conservative legal group that touched on polarizing issues currently under review by the court.

"If there were enforceable recusal standards at the high court, this would be a ripe opportunity for a motion to disqualify," said Gabe Roth, executive director of Fix the Court, a nonpartisan independent watchdog group that has lobbied for a formal code of conduct for the justices.

"It would encourage them to think twice before making political speeches to partisan organizations and further eroding the public's trust in their impartiality," Roth said.

Alito's remarks, delivered virtually on Thursday night to a conference hosted by the Federalist Society, focused on what he called the "unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" imposed during the coronavirus pandemic. He also spoke about abortion rights, same-sex marriage and the Second Amendment.

The justice criticized state governors who have exercised broad discretion in setting policies aimed at taming the virus's spread. He singled out capacity restrictions on houses of worship, lamenting Nevada's 50-person cap on religious gatherings, which the Supreme Court refused to strike down by a 5-4 vote in July.
...............
Alito's remarks, delivered virtually on Thursday night to a conference hosted by the Federalist Society, focused on what he called the "unimaginable restrictions on individual liberty" imposed during the coronavirus pandemic. He also spoke about abortion rights, same-sex marriage and the Second Amendment.

The justice criticized state governors who have exercised broad discretion in setting policies aimed at taming the virus's spread. He singled out capacity restrictions on houses of worship, lamenting Nevada's 50-person cap on religious gatherings, which the Supreme Court refused to strike down by a 5-4 vote in July.
..........
Some progressive Democrats, who have been calling for an expansion of the Supreme Court to counter the rushed confirmation of Barrett, said Alito's comments added urgency to their cause.

"Justice Alito's wildly inappropriate speech is a reminder that Republicans have packed the Supreme Court with extremist politicians in robes -- and they're planning a partisan revenge tour," said Aaron Belkin, director of Take Back the Court, a progressive group advocating court expansion.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., called Alito's speech "nakedly partisan" and said she wants to enact legislation to "force justices to follow the ethics rules other federal judges follow."

Supreme Court justices are not currently bound by any formal code of conduct and largely answer only to themselves on matters of ethics and recusal.
...............

None of these things, like the Latino vote for Trump, would indicate a Biden victory in Red states. It does not add up. That is why Biden will be considered illegitimate by OVER half the country. The numbers from the election mean ****.
https://bigleaguepolitics.com/donald-trump-received-a-greater-share-of-the-vote-in-new-york-than-any-republican-since-1988/

ABC news is biased and no longer a credible source. The media is no longer credible. Trump won that battle.

In fact, justices should not even think about commenting outside of their courts of law.

Real Americans are tired of being **** on. They are serious about keeping this country free.

https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/democrat-voter-fraud-letter-in-michigan-signed-by-over-100-people-the-supreme-court-will-see-this-if-local-judges-are-corrupt-or-cant-rule/

Now we are in super joke territory for theRump's election defense, what a sham:

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-trump-taps-rudy-giuliani-election-legal-fight/story?id=74204120&cid=clicksource_4380645_1_heads_hero_live_hero_hed
President Trump taps Rudy Giuliani to take over election legal fight:



Prior lawyers pulled out of a federal lawsuit in Pennsylvania Friday.
ByJohn Santucci andMatthew Mosk
November 13, 2020

President Donald Trump has installed Rudy Giuliani to lead the legal efforts he has mounted to resuscitate his failed bid for a second term in office, a move that comes after a series of court defeats Friday, two sources told ABC News.

A spokesperson for Giuliani confirmed his expanded role for the president.

The decision, first reported by The New York Times, also came following court filings from the law firm that had been handling some of the Trump campaign's legal efforts. Lawyers from K Street firm Porter Wright Morris & Arthur have asked to withdraw from the federal lawsuit the Trump campaign filed in Pennsylvania to challenge the election results there.
....................
"Plaintiffs and Porter Wright have reached a mutual agreement that Plaintiffs will be best served if Porter Wright withdraws, and current co-counsel and such other counsel as Plaintiffs may choose to engage represent Plaintiffs in this case."

Porter Wright filed the initial complaint in federal court earlier this week.

"These law firms have been under tremendous pressure as it became clear these claims were baseless, and that they were part of a broader campaign to delegitimize the election," Wendy Weiser, from the Brennan Center for Justice, a bipartisan law and public policy institute, told ABC News. "This was not an appropriate use of the court system."