192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  2  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 07:17 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

coldjoint wrote:
Then you call systematic racism a fact when it is theory from Communists.


Can you please link a source to that?

https://thefederalist.com/2020/09/29/critical-race-theory-is-a-classic-communist-divide-and-conquer-tactic/
neptuneblue
 
  0  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 07:24 pm
@coldjoint,
Oh LOOK! Another blog/opinion piece from a conservative far right web site! Congrats! You have no idea what you're talking about.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  2  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 07:30 pm
Quote:
Eight Big Reasons Critical Race Theory Is Terrible for Dealing with Racism

If anyone is capable of learning something, this article is for you.

Quote:
1) Critical Race Theory believes racism is present in every aspect of life, every relationship, and every interaction.
2) “Interest convergence”: White people only give black people opportunities and freedoms when it is also in their own interests.
3) Critical Race Theory is against free societies.
Got to love that one
4) Critical Race Theory only treats race issues as “socially constructed groups,” so there are no individuals in Critical Race Theory.
5) Critical Race Theory believes science, reason, and evidence are a “white” way of knowing and that storytelling and lived experience is a “black” alternative.
6) Critical Race Theory rejects all potential alternatives, like colorblindness, as forms of racism.
7) Critical Race Theory acts like anyone who disagrees with it must do so for racist and white supremacist reasons, even if those people are black.
8) Critical Race Theory cannot be satisfied.

Note number 8. The theory will keep us divided forever and that is by design
https://newdiscourses.com/2020/06/reasons-critical-race-theory-terrible-dealing-racism/.

neptuneblue
 
  0  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 07:43 pm
@coldjoint,
I have no idea what you're trying to say.

You posted systemic racism is communism yet you post a contradictory article out to "prove" something.

Exactly what are you trying to say?
coldjoint
 
  2  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 08:02 pm
@neptuneblue,
neptuneblue wrote:

I have no idea what you're trying to say.

You posted systemic racism is communism yet you post a contradictory article out to "prove" something.

Exactly what are you trying to say?

The systematic racism bullshit comes from Critical race theory. Bullshit begets bullshit.
0 Replies
 
coluber2001
 
  0  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 08:02 pm
(This is a very long--39 minutes--article about the internal danger that America faces.)

The Atlantic

History Will Judge the Complicit

Why have Republican leaders abandoned their principles in support of an immoral and dangerous president?

BY ANNE APPLEBAUM JUN 1, 2020 39 MINUTES

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2020/07/trumps-collaborators/612250/


(Exerp)
When Marshal Philippe Pétain, the leader of collaborationist France, took over the Vichy government, he did so in the name of the restoration of a France that he believed had been lost. Pétain had been a fierce critic of the French Republic, and once he was in control, he replaced its famous creed—Liberté, égalité, fraternité, or “Liberty, equality, fraternity”—with a different slogan: Travail, famille, patrie, or “Work, family, fatherland.” Instead of the “false idea of the natural equality of man,” he proposed bringing back “social hierarchy”—order, tradition, and religion. Instead of accepting modernity, Pétain sought to turn back the clock.

By Pétain’s reckoning, collaboration with the Germans was not merely an embarrassing necessity. It was crucial, because it gave patriots the ability to fight the real enemy: the French parliamentarians, socialists, anarchists, Jews, and other assorted leftists and democrats who, he believed, were undermining the nation, robbing it of its vitality, destroying its essence. “Rather Hitler than Blum,” the saying went—Blum having been France’s socialist (and Jewish) prime minister in the late 1930s. One Vichy minister, Pierre Laval, famously declared that he hoped Germany would conquer all of Europe. Otherwise, he asserted, “Bolshevism would tomorrow establish itself everywhere.”

To Americans, this kind of justification should sound very familiar; we have been hearing versions of it since 2016. The existential nature of the threat from “the left” has been spelled out many times. “Our liberal-left present reality and future direction is incompatible with human nature,” wrote Michael Anton, in “The Flight 93 Election.” The Fox News anchor Laura Ingraham has warned that “massive demographic changes” threaten us too: “In some parts of the country it does seem like the America that we know and love doesn’t exist anymore.” This is the Vichy logic: The nation is dead or dying—so anything you can do to restore it is justified. Whatever criticisms might be made of Trump, whatever harm he has done to democracy and the rule of law, whatever corrupt deals he might make while in the White House—all of these shrink in comparison to the horrific alternative: the liberalism, socialism, moral decadence, demographic change, and cultural degradation that would have been the inevitable result of Hillary Clinton’s presidency.

The Republican senators who are willing to express their disgust with Trump off the record but voted in February for him to remain in office all indulge a variation of this sentiment. (Trump enables them to get the judges they want, and those judges will help create the America they want.) So do the evangelical pastors who ought to be disgusted by Trump’s personal behavior but argue, instead, that the current situation has scriptural precedents. Like King David in the Bible, the president is a sinner, a flawed vessel, but he nevertheless offers a path to salvation for a fallen nation.

The three most important members of Trump’s Cabinet—Vice President Mike Pence, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, and Attorney General William Barr—are all profoundly shaped by Vichyite apocalyptic thinking. All three are clever enough to understand what Trumpism really means, that it has nothing to do with God or faith, that it is self-serving, greedy, and unpatriotic. Nevertheless, a former member of the administration (one of the few who did decide to resign) told me that both Pence and Pompeo “have convinced themselves that they are in a biblical moment.” All of the things they care about—outlawing abortion and same-sex marriage, and (though this is never said out loud) maintaining a white majority in America—are under threat. Time is growing short. They believe that “we are approaching the Rapture, and this is a moment of deep religious significance.” Barr, in a speech at Notre Dame, has also described his belief that “militant secularists” are destroying America, that “irreligion and secular values are being forced on people of faith.” Whatever evil Trump does, whatever he damages or destroys, at least he enables Barr, Pence, and Pompeo to save America from a far worse fate. If you are convinced we are living in the End Times, then anything the president does can be forgiven.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  2  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 08:09 pm
Quote:
Yale Psychiatrist Suggests Middle America May Need To Be 'Leveled' Like Dresden to Stop Trump

https://www.informationliberation.com/files/dresden-middle-america-bandy-x-lee.jpg
This is the author of the articles posted by Coluber 2001. Is this idiot (her) who we should listen to?
https://www.informationliberation.com/files/dresden-middle-america-bandy-x-lee.jpg
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  1  
Sun 1 Nov, 2020 08:14 pm
Quote:
Trump convoy in NY and NJ so MASSIVE it causes HIGHWAY SHUTDOWN, Libs/NeverTrump have HISSIES

Where or when is Biden's convoy? Laughing Laughing Laughing
https://newsthud.com/trump-convoy-in-ny-and-nj-so-massive-it-causes-highway-shutdown-libs-nevertrump-have-hissies/
Builder
 
  2  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 04:56 am
@coldjoint,
Quote:
Where or when is Biden's convoy?


It's a really interesting time in the history of advertising.

Not just in Joe's absences.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 05:45 am
Why Are Republicans So Afraid of Voters?

There is no “both sides do it” when it comes to intentionally keeping Americans away from the polls.

Quote:
As of Sunday afternoon, more than 93 million Americans had cast a ballot in the November elections. That’s about two-thirds of the total number of people who voted in 2016, and there are still two days until Election Day.

This is excellent news. In the middle of a global pandemic that has taken the lives of nearly a quarter of a million Americans, upended the national economy and thrown state election procedures into turmoil, there were reasonable concerns that many people would not vote at all. The numbers to date suggest that 2020 could see record turnout.

While celebrating this renewed citizen involvement in America’s political process, don’t lose sight of the bigger, and darker, picture. For decades, Americans have voted at depressingly low rates for a modern democracy. Even in a “good” year, more than one-third of all eligible voters don’t cast a ballot. In a bad year, that number can approach two-thirds.

Why are so many Americans consistently missing in action on Election Day?

For many, it’s a choice. They are disillusioned with government, or they feel their vote doesn’t matter because politicians don’t listen to them anyway.

For many more, the main obstacle is bureaucratic inertia. In New York City, a decrepit, incompetent, self-dealing board of elections has been making a mockery of democracy for decades. Just in the past four years, tens of thousands of absentee ballots have been sent to the wrong addresses, and hundreds of thousands of voters have been wrongly purged from the rolls. For the past few days, some New Yorkers have been forced to stand in line for four or five hours to cast their ballots.

But across the country, the group most responsible for making voting harder, if not impossible, for millions of Americans is the Republican Party. Republicans have been saying it themselves for ages. “I don’t want everybody to vote,” Paul Weyrich, a leader of the modern conservative movement, told a gathering of religious leaders in 1980. “As a matter of fact, our leverage in the elections quite candidly goes up as the voting populace goes down.”

This strategy has become a central pillar of the G.O.P. platform. It is behind the party’s relentless push for certain state laws and practices — like strict voter-identification requirements and targeted voter purges — that claim to be about preserving electoral integrity but are in fact about suppressing turnout and voting among groups that lean Democratic.

The strategy also is behind the partisan gerrymandering that Republican state lawmakers have mastered over the past decade, redrawing district lines to keep themselves in power even when they lose a majority of the statewide vote. (Democrats gerrymander when they can, too, but the most egregious examples of the past decade have been by Republicans.)

And the party is behind the early shutdown of this year’s census, which the Trump administration insisted on over the objections of longtime Census Bureau officials, and which it hopes will result in an undercount of people in Democratic-leaning parts of the country.

The Supreme Court’s conservative majority has greenlit the Republicans’ anti-democratic power grabs. In 2013, by a 5-to-4 vote, the court struck down the heart of the Voting Rights Act, giving free rein to states with long histories of racial discrimination in voting. Last year, the court, again by a 5-to-4 vote, refused to block even the most brazenly partisan gerrymanders, no matter how much they disenfranchised voters.

This year, in the face of the unprecedented hurdles to voting introduced by the coronavirus pandemic, Republicans are battling from coast to coast to ensure that casting a ballot is as hard as it can be. In Texas, Gov. Greg Abbott mandated a single ballot drop-box per county — including the increasingly Democratic Harris County, population 4.7 million. Republican lawmakers there are also suing to throw out more than 100,000 ballots cast by Harris County voters from their cars, at drive-through sites.

In Nevada, the Trump campaign and the state Republican Party have sued to stop counting mail-in ballots until observers can more closely monitor the signature-matching process. In Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Wisconsin, Republicans have fought to prevent the counting of all mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day, even if they are postmarked on or before Nov. 3.

This all amounts to “a concerted national Republican effort across the country in every one of the states that has had a legal battle to make it harder for citizens to vote,” said Trevor Potter, a Republican lawyer who formerly led the Federal Election Commission and worked on both of John McCain’s presidential campaigns.

The effort has been turbocharged by President Trump, who has spent the past year falsely attacking the integrity of mail-in ballots. Mr. Trump’s lies have been echoed by the attorney general, William Barr, who has claimed that mail balloting is associated with “substantial fraud.” Not remotely true. Mr. Trump’s own handpicked F.B.I. director, Christopher Wray, has said there is no evidence of any coordinated voter-fraud effort. Scholars, researchers and judges have said for years that voting fraud of any kind is vanishingly rare in this country. That hasn’t stopped Republicans from alleging that it happens all the time. They know that accusations of fraud can be enough by themselves to confuse voters and drive down turnout.

When that tactic fails, Republicans turn to another tried-and-true one: voter intimidation. Frightening people, particularly Black people, away from the ballot box has a long history in the United States. Modern Republicans have done it so consistently that in 1982 a federal court barred the national party from engaging in any so-called anti-voter-fraud operations. The ban was renewed again and again over the decades, because Republicans kept violating it. In 2018, however, it expired, meaning that 2020 is the first election in which Republicans can intimidate with abandon.

All the while, Mr. Trump happily plays the part of intimidator in chief. He has urged his supporters to enlist in an “Army for Trump,” monitoring polls. “A lot of strange things happening in Philadelphia,” Mr. Trump said during a recent campaign stop in Pennsylvania. “We’re watching you, Philadelphia. We’re watching at the highest level.”

Representative democracy works only when a large majority of people participate in choosing their representatives. That can happen only when those in power agree that voting should be as easy and widely available as possible. Yet today, one of the two major political parties is convinced it cannot win on a level playing field — and will not even try.

What would a level playing field look like? For starters, it would have more polling places, more early-voting days and shorter voting lines. Since the Supreme Court gutted the heart of the Voting Rights Act in 2013, almost 1,700 polling places have been shut down, most of them in the states that had been under federal supervision for their past discriminatory voting practices. It’s no surprise that voters in predominantly Black neighborhoods wait 29 percent longer to cast ballots than voters in white neighborhoods.

A fair election would mean giving all states the necessary funds to implement automatic voter registration and to upgrade old voting machines. It would mean allowing people with criminal records to vote as soon as they have completed the terms of their sentences.

Many of these reforms have already been adopted in some states, and they have enjoyed bipartisan support. In the case of early voting, some Republican-led states are ahead of their Democratic counterparts. Georgia, for example, has long offered many weeks of early voting — far better than New York, which began the practice only last year, and for only 10 days. (It’s worth noting that Georgia once had even more early-voting days. Republican lawmakers cut them back by more than half after Black voters started taking advantage of early voting in 2008.)

To help ensure that voting is easier for everybody, the federal government needs to take action. Currently, there are two comprehensive voting-rights bills in Congress, the Voting Rights Amendment Act and H.R. 1, also known as the For the People Act. The first bill would update the old map the Supreme Court invalidated in 2013 and would identify the states and localities that are racially discriminating against their voters today, requiring them to seek federal court approval before changing any election laws.

The second bill would, among other things, create a national voter-registration program; make it harder for states to purge voting rolls; and take gerrymandering away from self-interested state legislatures, putting the redistricting process in the hands of nonpartisan commissions.

The House of Representatives passed both of these bills in 2019, with all Democrats voting in favor both times. The Voting Rights Amendment Act got the vote of a single House Republican. H.R. 1 got none. The Republican-led Senate has refused to act on either. Mitch McConnell, the majority leader, mocked H.R. 1 by referring to it as the “Democrat Politician Protection Act.” Listen to him closely. He is only repeating what most Republicans have believed for decades: When more people vote, Republicans lose.

That’s why, if either of these laws is going to pass, it will require, at a minimum, voting out Republicans at every level who insist on suppressing the vote. Only then can those who believe in representative democracy for all Americans reset the rules and help ensure that everyone’s vote counts.

nyt
snood
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 06:19 am
@hightor,
One thing that’s very telling is how the right wingers on this site cannot even acknowledge the Republican widespread efforts to limit the number of votes that get cast and counted.
0 Replies
 
Rebelofnj
 
  -1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 06:31 am
Politics pit neighbor against neighbor as Election Day looms

Quote:
Amid the erosion of political discourse, a fear of retaliation has spread, pitting neighbor against neighbor and squashing the political exchange that fuels a thriving democracy, experts say. Some Americans say they have taken down election yard signs and quit social media over fears they could be physically targeted. The victims are often political minorities: blue voters in red states and red voters in blue states.

The threats have affected voters from coast to coast. A Pennsylvania family found six gunshots fired through the Biden sign in their front lawn in early October, according to local media reports. An Alabama woman with a Biden sign in front of her home told local news she woke up to the word “Trump” spray-painted in bright orange on the hood of her white Honda Civic.

A convoy of trucks flying Trump flags aggressively chased a Biden campaign bus recently on an interstate near Austin. Video of the chase, which quickly went viral on social media, shows one truck swerve into the path of another vehicle, scraping its passenger door, to tailgate the bus.

Trump supporters have been targeted, too. A video circulating online shows a man ripping a Trump flag off a car during a parade supporting the president in Orange County, Calif., in early October. Even the head of the Georgetown County elections board in South Carolina was swept into political tensions when local Republicans said they captured him and his wife defacing a Trump sign. Dean Smith, a 15-year veteran of the board, resigned a few days later, the Coastal Observer reported.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/people-are-scared-politics-pit-neighbor-against-neighbor-as-election-day-looms/2020/10/31/ae4bb794-1a67-11eb-82db-60b15c874105_story.html
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 07:11 am
Somebody wrote:

Where or when is Biden's convoy?

See, this character thinks that causing a massive traffic jam is a sign of political strength when in reality it's just hooliganism committed by people with little regard for public safety, egged on by the authoritarian in the White House who has already demonstrated a callous disregard for public health.
snood wrote:
One thing that’s very telling is how the right wingers on this site cannot even acknowledge the Republican widespread efforts to limit the number of votes that get cast and counted.

Even though Trump has basically blurted out as much!
Walter Hinteler
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 07:25 am
@hightor,
hightor wrote:
in reality it's just hooliganism committed by people with little regard for public safety, egged on by the authoritarian in the White House who has already demonstrated a callous disregard for public health.
However, this is not an isolated incidents.

There is a pattern behind it: a right-wing minority is trying to intimidate the majority.
And in the WH, the Bully President is in the front line.
0 Replies
 
hightor
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 07:35 am
Somebody wrote:

The systematic racism bullshit comes from Critical race theory.

Somebody needs to learn how to read. The concept of systemic racism doesn't derive from Critical Race Theory (which wasn't developed until the late '80s). It's not even a "theory" — it's the name given to a very real set of conditions:
Quote:
Extensive academic research and data collected by the federal government and researchers has documented numerous ways that Black Americans experience life in the United States differently from their white counterparts.

It's called "systemic" racism because it's ingrained in nearly every way people move through society in the policies and practices at institutions like banks, schools, companies, government agencies, and law enforcement.


Here's how it works:
26 simple charts to show friends and family who aren't convinced racism is still a problem in America
blatham
 
  0  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 07:50 am
Whatever you read today, add this...
Quote:
America’s Press and the Asymmetric War for Truth
Jay Rosen
The Republican Party—now committed to minoritarian rule, not democracy—needs fictions to sustain its power. And that means a collision with honest journalism.
November 1, 2020
NYRB

If you're not able to access, let me know and I'll post in toto.
Walter Hinteler
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 07:54 am
@blatham,
Russian government-supported organisations are playing a small but increasing role amplifying conspiracy theories promoted by QAnon, raising concerns of interference in the US election(s).

Graphica: Interpreting Social Qs: Implications of the Evolution of QAnon (pdf)
blatham
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 08:05 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Thanks Walter!
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  1  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 09:13 am
Quote:
Secretary Pompeo
@SecPompeo

US government account
· 1h
We are deeply concerned by reports of election irregularities, politically motivated arrests, and violence during Tanzania’s elections last week. We urge authorities to fully address concerns of irregularities and will review allegations of the use of force against civilians.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  4  
Mon 2 Nov, 2020 11:11 am
@hightor,
Quote:
Extensive academic research and data collected by the federal government and researchers

That is a warning sign right there. Academics hate this country whether from what they learned or who is really paying them(as in foreign governments).

And I and others are not buying that crap. I do not care how many reasons you give when the main reason for pushing this crap is keeping people divided, promoting self-hatred and manufactured guilt. And then it is all used for political gains.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 2.35 seconds on 11/14/2024 at 05:20:46