192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
camlok
 
  2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:49 pm
@oralloy,
FEMA, NIST, the USGS, RJ Lee Group are truthers? Really, this is the argument you want to advance?
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:49 pm
@Finn dAbuzz,
Finn dAbuzz wrote:
Another WTF.
What is your proud challenge?

He has photographic proof that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by an invisible alien spacecraft piloted by JFK and Elvis.

You can tell that the spacecraft has an invisibility shield from the way it doesn't appear in the photograph.
camlok
 
  2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:52 pm
@oralloy,
Oralloy: He has photographic proof that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by an invisible alien spacecraft piloted by JFK and Elvis.

You can tell that the spacecraft has an invisibility shield from the way it doesn't appear in the photograph.

-----------------------------------

This is a dandy example, not only of his dishonesty, Finn, but his predilection to avoid addressing the issues raised.
Baldimo
 
  -1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:56 pm
@camlok,
Quote:
This is a dandy example, not only of his dishonesty, Finn, but his predilection to avoid addressing the issues raised.

You are the only one wanting to address the issues that were raised. No one else is buying into your conspiracy theory yet you are trying to force the issue by calling people's integrity into question because they don't by into "The govt was responsible for 9-11".

Stay the course if you wish, but it will be lonely.
nimh
 
  3  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:56 pm
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

You can tell that the spacecraft has an invisibility shield from the way it doesn't appear in the photograph.

Okay that made me chuckle..
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:57 pm
@camlok,
camlok wrote:
his predilection to avoid addressing the issues raised.

My inclination to discuss 9/11 conspiracy gibberish is slim to begin with. It falls to zero when the other person relies on personal attacks.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:58 pm
@Baldimo,
Given what was in them, I was definitely fine with those leaks. The timing was stupid, but we're learning more about that every day.

__

As noted in many places, many times, the problem is the fire, not the alarm.

cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 04:58 pm
@oralloy,
It's not about "personal issues." It's about reality.
ehBeth
 
  3  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:01 pm
@camlok,
camlok wrote:

Is that any crazier than Americans deciding what is best Iraqis, Afghans, Syrians, Cubans, Vietnamese, Koreans, Chileans, ... ?


Shocked

love this
oralloy
 
  -2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:04 pm
@cicerone imposter,
cicerone imposter wrote:
It's not about "personal issues." It's about reality.

Wrong. When you make a post that is all personal attack and no substance, there is no reality involved.
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:05 pm
@Baldimo,
"The govt was responsible for 9-11"
==========

That is patently dishonest, meaning you have lied. I stated clearly and repeatedly that I don't know who was responsible for 911. I only addressed who was not responsible for the collapse of WTCs 1, 2 and 7.

The proof that I put forward came from, how many times does it need to be repeated, US government sources and top US scientists.

Wherein lies the integrity of people who will not even discuss US government material?
0 Replies
 
cicerone imposter
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:08 pm
@oralloy,
You mean Trump's observation of thousands celebrating the destruction of the twin towers is reality?
How about Trump's declaration that Mexico sends "criminals and rapists?" Do you agree with his "ban on all Muslims coming into our country?"
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:10 pm
@oralloy,
and no substance,
---------------

Are you saying that FEMA, NIST, RJ Lee Group provide no substance? The vast majority of all my posts on this issue have been to lay out what they have said about the molten metals found at all WTC sites.

As I said to Baldimo, let's just discuss what those US government and private experts said about things molten on and after September 11, 2001.
farmerman
 
  2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:11 pm
@camlok,
OY, youre not one of those "WTC truther" wackos are you??.

camlok
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:12 pm
@cicerone imposter,
Or Trump's observations that explosives surely had to have been used because the towers were too robust, too strong to have succumbed to things they were designed for.
0 Replies
 
oralloy
 
  -1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:15 pm
@cicerone imposter,
You No Take Candle!
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:16 pm
@farmerman,
Most assuredly not. I'm a person who believes in science.

Specifically the science described by FEMA, the eutectic steel, the molten steel, the molten molybdenum described by the RJ Lee Group, the vaporized lead, the molten iron spheres described by that same group, in concentrations 1500 times that found in normal office dust.

There is a lot of science to discuss.
camlok
 
  1  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:17 pm
@oralloy,
That isn't an example of honestly addressing anything.
farmerman
 
  2  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:19 pm
@camlok,
Do you know how much Mo is used to austenitize a ferrite cube?
oralloy
 
  -3  
Thu 16 Feb, 2017 05:21 pm
@camlok,
Ickinicka!
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.51 seconds on 10/31/2024 at 10:28:30