monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

Wrong. No such imaginary substance was found by anyone.

They are not my videos. Such a childish response!! They are Nat Geo. You still haven't explained how Muslims were able to melt and vaporize steel with 1500F fires. Actually you, and your fellow travelers, who clap and cheer for their governments murdering thousands of Americans can't seem to explain anything at all about anything about 9/11.

This truly illustrates just how woefully ignorant americans are and how dern proud of that fact they are.

No steel was melted or vaporized. I feel no need to explain events that never happened.

The US government did not murder anyone.

Stating that the New York Times called these findings “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation,” the article added:

“A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges – which are curled like a paper scroll – have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes – some larger than a silver dollar – let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending – but not holes.”

That was the chemically-caused corrosion that was referred to earlier.

That is incorrect. This is a general thread for any kind of nonsense.

This is the one place on the internet where JTT's silly rants are not off topic.

Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade
Center Catastrophe
Niels H. Harrit*,1, Jeffrey Farrer2
, Steven E. Jones*,3, Kevin R. Ryan4
, Frank M. Legge5
,
Daniel Farnsworth2
, Gregg Roberts6
, James R. Gourley7
and Bradley R. Larsen3
1
Department of Chemistry, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
2
Department of Physics and Astronomy, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA
3
S&J Scientific Co., Provo, UT, 84606, USA
4
9/11 Working Group of Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47401, USA
5
Logical Systems Consulting, Perth, Western Australia
6
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Berkeley, CA 94704, USA
7
International Center for 9/11 Studies, Dallas, TX 75231, USA

https://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf

That never happened. No such material was found.

The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation
of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum
are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich
spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these
chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Explain.

Really?

Arguing about 9/11 NOW?

WTF?

Get a grip.

Well I was trying to argue about Hiroshima/Nagasaki, but the subject drifted a bit.

Have you written a text book about the subject?

About Hiroshima/Nagasaki?

No, but I'm qualified to write one.

Perhaps you can explain how 1500F fires [USGOCT fact] melted and vaporized WTCs 1, 2 & 7 structural steel.

===================

Stating that the New York Times called these findings “perhaps the deepest mystery uncovered in the investigation,” the article added:

“A one-inch column has been reduced to half-inch thickness. Its edges – which are curled like a paper scroll – have been thinned to almost razor sharpness. Gaping holes – some larger than a silver dollar – let light shine through a formerly solid steel flange. This Swiss cheese appearance shocked all of the fire-wise professors, who expected to see distortion and bending – but not holes.” [15]

In discussing “the deepest mystery,” the New York Times story said: “The steel apparently melted away, but no fire in any of the buildings was believed to be hot enough to melt steel outright.” [16] That was an understatement, because a building fire, even with a perfect mixture of air and fuel, could at most reach 1,000°C (1,832°F). [17] In fact, Professor Thomas Eagar of MIT estimated that the fires were “probably only about 1,200 or 1,300°F [648 or 704°C].” [18]

There was no melted or vaporized steel.

oralloy is woefully ignorant on most every topic, certainly the science and evidence of 9/11 and he has displayed that here in spades, along with his myriad bald faced lies.

Really...

Yes.

Not believing in your silly delusions does not make someone ignorant.

You are the only person here who is too ignorant to tell the difference between steel and aluminum.

Hint: one is lighter than the other.