192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
Real Music
 
  5  
Tue 2 Jun, 2020 10:27 pm
@Lash,
Bishop OUTRAGED at Trump
for using her church for a (Photo Op).



Below viewing threshold (view)
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Tue 2 Jun, 2020 10:54 pm

Starts around 6 minutes naming studies and statistics.
Quote:
They can’t find Evidence of Disproportionate Deadly Force Used Against Blacks! How can you not know that before going out and protesting? …Well done Black Lives Matter…
0 Replies
 
Real Music
 
  3  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 12:12 am
@Lash,
Trump's tear gas photo-op was 'frightening' to authoritarianism experts, who warn that his behavior will only get worse without 'fierce opposition'


Published June 2, 2020

Quote:
President Donald Trump on Monday threatened to deploy the military to quell nationwide unrest over the death of George Floyd, a black man who died after a Minnesota police officer knelt on his neck.

As Trump made these threats, a crowd of peaceful protesters were tear-gassed outside of the White House to clear the way for the president to walk to a nearby church for a photo-op.

Videos showed demonstrators being pushed, struck with batons, and tear-gassed. Democrats and critics of the president accuse him of employing authoritarian tactics.

Top experts on authoritarianism and fascism said this confrontation on live TV was "frightening," and warned that the president could continue to escalate the situation if left unchallenged.

Some experts say that it's too generous to label Trump an authoritarian or fascist, in the sense he doesn't have a coherent political philosophy, but they also say this doesn't make him "any less dangerous."

It was the type of story one might expect out of countries like China, Russia, and Iran, with well-documented human rights violations and regimes that use state-dominated media to convey the power and strength of the government and its leader.

A crowd of peaceful protesters demonstrating outside of the White House on Monday were tear-gassed and beaten to clear the way for President Donald Trump to take a photo at a nearby church.

Prior to the photo-op, Trump delivered a statement in the Rose Garden in which he threatened to deploy the US military if unrest that's been consuming the country over the past week is not stopped by state and local leaders.

"If a city or state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States Military and quickly solve the problem for them," Trump said on Monday.

While Trump was talking, the sound of projectiles being fired could be heard in the distance. Trump in his remarks said he was an "ally of all peaceful protesters," even as nonviolent demonstrators were targeted with a chemical agent on his behalf.

Experts who study authoritarian regimes say Trump is invoking an us-versus-them mentality that condones harsh, even military-style crackdowns on fellow citizens who are protesting, in what could be an effort to boost support among law enforcement and right-wing groups ahead of the November election. These experts warned Trump's behavior is weakening democracy in the US.

The White House, however, defended Trump's crackdown as a "lawful, decisive action," in a response to Insider.

"As President Trump has said, we cannot allow the voices of peaceful protestors to be drowned out by angry mobs, which is why the President will continue to take lawful, decisive action to stop the violence and restore the security of all Americans," Judd Deere, a White House spokesperson, told Insider in response to the experts who found Trump's actions troubling.

The US Park Police on Tuesday disputed using tear gas on the protesters, stating that "smoke canisters and pepper balls" were employed. In a statement, the Trump campaign accused the media of lying that tear gas was used, and Trump reiterated this in a tweet on Tuesday. Multiple reporters and bystanders who were present during the incident have said otherwise, and footage of the incident depicted a harrowing scene.

—Yamiche Alcindor (@Yamiche) June 1, 2020

'He is putting his image ahead of any effort to provide constructive leadership'

Monday's events sparked outcry against Trump on a level that's perhaps not been seen since the president blamed "many sides" for deadly violence at a neo-Nazi rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, in August 2017.

Democrats were quick to accuse the president of employing authoritarian tactics.

"This is an abject failure of presidential leadership, an incendiary act of division, an escalation of tensions, and the type of actions undertaken by authoritarian regimes throughout the world," Democratic Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, a former CIA officer, said in a statement.

Former Vice President Joe Biden, the presumptive 2020 Democratic nominee for president, on Tuesday said Trump was destroying "the guardrails that have long protected our democracy."

Ben Rhodes, who served as deputy national security adviser under former President Barack Obama, in a tweet described Trump as "an incompetent fascist" in response to Monday's crackdown.

—Reuters (@Reuters) June 2, 2020

Numerous scholars have long said that Trump has authoritarian tendencies, and have been alarmed by the ways in which the president has sought to exploit the coronavirus pandemic, and the nationwide protests over the brutal death of George Floyd at the hands of police, for his own political benefit.

The tear-gassing of peaceful protesters and threat to use the military against US citizens is "frightening behavior," Sheri Berman, a professor of political science at Barnard College with expertise in democracy, populism, and fascism, told Insider. But it's also not out of line with Trump's previous antics, Berman added, which appear to be motivated "by a belief that the world is divided into 'friends and foes,' rather than people with legitimate differences over policy."

"Once someone is considered a 'foe' rather than merely a political opponent, it becomes easy to anathematize and use methods of questionable legality and even violence against them," Berman said.

Echoing these sentiments, Columbia University historian Robert Paxton told Insider that Trump's "current language seems to me to constitute more of the same bluster and aggressivity that we have seen all along."

"But the tense circumstances of the present moment give Trump's current bluster greater resonance. He seems to fear most of all being considered weak or conciliatory, so he is taking an aggressive line that he thinks will make him look strong to his base. He is putting his image ahead of any effort to provide constructive leadership," Paxton, author of "The Anatomy of Fascism," added.

Trump in recent days has likened the protesters with terrorists and called on governors to "dominate" them. Last week, the president echoed an infamous segregationist, George Wallace, in tweeting that "when the looting starts, the shooting starts."

The president was virtually absent as a leader in response to the unrest as it reached disturbing heights over the weekend, hiding in a White House bunker and tweeting away. When he finally emerged to make his first national address on the disarray on Monday, Trump threatened US citizens with a type of force rarely seen in democratic countries, prompting allusions to Tiananmen Square from Democratic senators.

'Fierce opposition straight away'

Trump has shown "strong authoritarian impulses and a fundamental disregard for liberal democratic values and institutions" since the start his 2016 presidential campaign, Cas Mudde, a political scientist at the University of Georgia who's an expert on populism, extremism, and democracy, told Insider. The president treats the US government as if it's his business, Mudde said, believing that everyone within it works for him and are "under only his authority."

"What is most worrying is that Trump often suggests an outrageous proposal, which he walks back a few days later, but implements in slightly moderated forms later," Mudde added. "This is why fierce opposition straight away, and continued vigilance afterward, are crucial. While some leading Republicans often join in the former, they usually fail in the latter."

There has been little to no criticism of Trump from Republicans in recent days, with Democrats in Congress and the people out on America's streets as the only substantial form of opposition. Meanwhile, Trump has surrounded himself with partisan advisers and appears to value loyalty above all else, and in recent weeks has purged a number of inspectors general (independent watchdogs) from the ranks of the federal government.

With "would-be authoritarians" like Trump, the country should always be "concerned about their misuse of crises to violate norms, solidify authority over the security branches of government, and threaten the media," Jason Stanley, a Yale philosophy professor who wrote "How Fascism Works," told Insider.

Trump is trying to exploit the protests as a means of pushing the boundaries of executive power, Stanley said, and to "bond ever more closely with law enforcement and racist armed supporters in advance of the 2020 elections."

There's widespread agreement among experts that Trump's language resembles that of fascist dictators, authoritarians, or autocrats; Twitter recently warned one of his tweets was "glorifying violence." But there is still a reluctance among many scholars to ascribe a specific political term or philosophy to Trump.

Trump's nationalism, rhetoric, and intolerance of dissent "all recall fascist models," Paxton said, but he wouldn't go as far to explicitly attach the label "fascist" to Trump. The independence with which the Trump administration grants to businesses, including tax privileges, relief from environmental rules, and support in trade conflicts, among other freedoms, leads Paxton to lean toward calling the Trump administration "plutocratic rather than fascist."

"Somebody who is totally erratic and has no ultimate vision, and is basically knee-jerking all the time, it's almost a misuse of the term to flatter them with a political science term, because it gives their behavior a sort of Machiavellian subtlety, which it lacks in the case of Trump," Roger Griffin, author of "The Nature of Fascism" and emeritus professor in modern history at Oxford Brookes University, told Insider.

"He resembles to me, a sort of late Roman emperor, one of these half-breeds who got in through the backdoor through a murder or marriage ... with no strategy or vision or institutional ideology," Griffin added of Trump, stating he's not "intelligent enough" to be called a fascist.

Griffin said Trump is an authoritarian to "the extent that he ignores the fundamental principles of liberal democracy."

"But, again, it's flattering him," Griffin added. "He's got an adolescent, teenager, tantrum-type approach to power."

Though Trump does not appear to have any tangible goals beyond maintaining power, it does not make him "any less dangerous," Berman said, as the president continues to exacerbate the "incendiary" situation the country currently finds itself in with a pandemic and racial tensions colliding in a devastating fashion.

"His interpretation of becoming president is that of a narcissist, egomaniac who thinks that because he's been voted in he doesn't need to devolve power or consult in any meaningful sense with anybody else," Griffin said, going on to say that when the history of this era is written, Monday's teargas photo-op might turn out to have been "one symbolic gesture too far."

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trumps-tear-gas-photo-op-was-frightening-to-authoritarianism-experts-who-warn-that-his-behavior-will-only-get-worse-without-fierce-opposition/ar-BB14W7Vz?ocid=UE13DHP
Below viewing threshold (view)
Walter Hinteler
 
  9  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 01:23 am
Trump’s Visits to Church and Shrine Draw Fierce Rebukes From D.C. Clergy
Quote:
The Episcopal bishop Mariann Edgar Budde and the Catholic Archbishop Wilton Gregory said the president was using holy sites as political props.
[...]
Bishop Budde and Archbishop Gregory are both known for their commitment to social justice. But the twin statements from two different branches of Christianity had a significant effect, winning applause from liberals but denunciations from Trump supporters as disrespectful.
... ... ...


Trump's church visit shocks religious leaders
Quote:
Rabbi Jack Moline, President of the Interfaith Alliance, said: "Seeing President Trump standing in front of St John's Episcopal Church while holding a Bible in response to calls for racial justice - right after using military force to clear peaceful protesters - is one of the most flagrant misuses of religion that I have ever seen."

President Trump does not belong to a particular congregation, only occasionally attends a service and has said many times that he does not like to ask God for forgiveness.
Walter Hinteler
 
  3  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 04:37 am
@Walter Hinteler,
On the other side:

'He wears the armor of God': evangelicals hail Trump's church photo op
Quote:
No one accuses Donald Trump of subtlety. When the US president raised a Bible overhead on Monday evening outside St John’s Episcopal church in Washington DC, the sign was unmistakable: an appeal to his evangelical base for loyalty, as protests and riots roared across America.

Not every Christian answered the call. The Rev Gini Gerbasi, an Episcopal priest, said police used teargas to drive her and others from St John’s before Trump’s appearance. “They turned holy ground into a battleground,” she told Religion News Service.

But many of Trump’s evangelical supporters, far from Washingtons political stage, saw the move as a victory in a world rife with evil.

“My whole family was flabbergasted,” said Benjamin Horbowy, 37.

The Horbowys had gathered in Tallahassee, Florida, to watch live as Trump walked from the White House to St John’s. “My mother just shouted out, ‘God give him strength! He’s doing a Jericho walk!’”

A Jericho walk, in some evangelical circles, refers to the biblical book of Joshua, where God commanded the Israelites to walk seven times around the opposing city of Jericho, whose walls then came crashing down.

Horbowy already supported Trump politically – he heads the local chapter of a pro- Trump motorcycle club and is campaigning for a seat in Florida’s state senate – but when Trump lifted the Bible, Horbowy and his family felt overcome spiritually.

“My mother started crying. She comes from Pentecostal background, and she started speaking in tongues. I haven’t heard her speak in tongues in years,” he said. “I thought, look at my president! He’s establishing the Lord’s kingdom in the world.”

Did he feel that conflicted with the Gospel of John, where Jesus said “my kingdom is not of this world”?

“Well,” Horbowy said, “that’s a philosophical question.”

After watching Trump’s gesture, Horbowy changed his Facebook profile photo to one of Trump outside St John’s, with added rays of light emanating from the Bible. “It was the coolest thing he could do. What more could he do, wear blue jeans and ride in on a horse?” he said.

The catalysts for the protests was the killing of 46-year-old George Floyd by Minneapolis police. Asked about that, Horbowy said, “There’s a Bible verse that says we shouldn’t talk about evil things. We can just say, ‘There’s evil’ and move on.”

He couldn’t remember the exact verse, he said.

So how did devotees like Horbowy become such a potent force that Trump would signal them in his hour of need? One answer lies in their relationship with Trump. They have given him their fervent support at the ballot box and in turn they have seen a conservative takeover of the courts and an assault on reproductive and LGBTQ+ rights.

Their power and worldview is a culmination of trends that started decades ago, according to John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College and himself an evangelical Christian. “It’s rooted in fear,” he said.

In the 1980s, Fea said, several forces converged to alarm white Christians: a removal of official prayer and Bible readings from schools, an influx of immigrants from Asia and the Middle East, and the final desegregation of schools like Bob Jones University.

“So came the emergence of the Christian right,” Fea said.

Figures like Jerry Falwell and James Dobson started wielding political influence in a new way, followed today by a new generation that includes Franklin Graham and the Dallas pastor Robert Jeffress, one of Trump’s leading evangelical defenders.

“What seems to be missing in much of the coverage is that a group of protesters had tried to burn that church to the ground 24 hours earlier,” Jeffress said.

Jeffress sees no conflict between Trump’s behavior and the Bible he held up Monday evening. “You mean, does he pretend to be perfectly pious?” he said. “No.”

Fea calls faith leaders like Jeffress “court evangelicals”.

“Trump has these people around him,” Fea said. “They’re telling him, ‘You need to get your evangelical base on board.

People once concerned with piety, Fea said, now crave “an exercise in pure political power”, and the Bible is not longer a spiritual weapon but an earthly one.

When Trump describes himself as a “law and order” president and holds aloft a Bible, he conflates which law he will enforce, and whose order will follow. In a short speech before the walk to St John’s, Trump said he would “dominate the streets”. That is the “kingdom in the world” Horbowy referenced.

“I believe it’s like Ephesians 6:10 through 19,” Horbowy said from Florida. “I believe this is a president who wears the full armor of God.”

But one of those verses – verse 12 – says explicitly that “we do not wrestle against flesh and blood”, but against spiritual enemies.

“Well,” Howbowy said. “He’s fearless.”
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 06:14 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Police officers Take A Knee in Solidarity With Protestors in Boston
Boston continues to hold its historical position as the Cradle of Liberty in America
Below viewing threshold (view)
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 06:57 am
FBI Asks for Evidence...People Respond With Videos of Police Violence

FBI Asks for Evidence of Individuals Inciting Violence During Protests, People Respond With Videos of Police Violence
By Jason Lemon On 6/2/20 at 1:01 PM EDT


The FBI on Monday posted to social media a request for photos and videos of individuals provoking violence during the nationwide peaceful demonstrations over the killing of George Floyd last week. But many on Twitter quickly began sharing video clips and photos of police cracking down violently on protesters.

"The FBI is seeking information and digital media depicting individuals inciting violence during First Amendment protected peaceful demonstrations," the FBI wrote on its Twitter account. The post included a link to get more information on the bureau's website.

"To help us identify actors who are actively instigating violence in the wake of George Floyd's death, the FBI is accepting tips and digital media depicting violent encounters surrounding the civil unrest that is happening throughout the country," the webpage explained. "If you witness or have witnessed unlawful violent actions, we urge you to submit any information, photos, or videos that could be relevant to the case."


more...

https://www.newsweek.com/fbi-asks-evidence-individuals-inciting-violence-during-protests-people-respond-videos-police-1508165
MontereyJack
 
  4  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 07:14 am
@bobsal u1553115,
To the FBI: Be careful what you wish for because you may get it.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 07:19 am
Good Riddance: The Frank Rizzo Statue Has Been Removed
Source: Philadelphia Magazine

There hasn’t been much good news coming in overnight lately. But we finally have some to report: the Frank Rizzo statue is gone.

That’s right. When you went to bed last night, the Frank Rizzo statue still loomed large over the plaza outside of the Municipal Services Building. But now, it doesn’t.

The statue’s exact whereabouts are currently unknown. Also unknown is what’s going to happen to it next. We’d suggest tossing it in the river but, you know, the river’s already polluted enough


Read more: https://www.phillymag.com/news/2020/06/03/frank-rizzo-statue-removed/

0 Replies
 
Below viewing threshold (view)
Lash
 
  -3  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 07:38 am
@Real Music,
Since you’re sharing old news with me, here’s some for you.

Why did Barack Obama take all those votes from hopeful oppressed black Americans and do nothing to fight the generational subjection and vilification of those people? He even picked a known hardline racist to appeal to the racist Clinton New Democrats, code-messaging them that he was black in skin only—not at heart. Like Joe later, he was telling them nothing would really change.

Bernie Sanders PROMISED those changes and all the racist Clinton New Democrats like you and the Centrists here slapped him down for a safe racist Democrat—who’s said the words to Wall Street and corporate bosses, “Nothing will change.”

As long as we play this disgusting game, nothing will change.

Break the game. Fire them all. Break this **** down and build it back right, brick by brick.


0 Replies
 
revelette1
 
  3  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 07:48 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Quote:
Mat. 23:25 Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess. 26Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.


Trump was so brave, Barr cleared the protestors away before he made the walk of Jericho.
0 Replies
 
Region Philbis
 
  5  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 08:40 am
Quote:
Esper breaks with Trump to oppose using active duty troops to quell protests

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said Wednesday that he does not support using active duty troops to quell the large-scale protests across the United States triggered by the death of George Floyd and those forces should only be used in a law enforcement role as a last resort, directly contradicting President Donald Trump.

"The option to use active duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in the most urgent and dire of situations. We are not in one of those situations now. I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act," he said during a briefing at the Pentagon.
(cnn)
izzythepush
 
  6  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 08:59 am
@Region Philbis,
That’s a bit of good news.

I wonder how much longer Esper will remain as Secretary of Defense.
Region Philbis
 
  1  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 09:04 am
@izzythepush,

i'm sure his days are numbered for contradicting our POSPOTUS...
farmerman
 
  2  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 09:08 am
@Region Philbis,
as an acronym, does POS have anything to do with dung?
Frank Apisa
 
  6  
Wed 3 Jun, 2020 09:08 am
@Region Philbis,
Region Philbis wrote:

Quote:
Esper breaks with Trump to oppose using active duty troops to quell protests

Secretary of Defense Mark Esper said Wednesday that he does not support using active duty troops to quell the large-scale protests across the United States triggered by the death of George Floyd and those forces should only be used in a law enforcement role as a last resort, directly contradicting President Donald Trump.

"The option to use active duty forces in a law enforcement role should only be used as a matter of last resort, and only in the most urgent and dire of situations. We are not in one of those situations now. I do not support invoking the Insurrection Act," he said during a briefing at the Pentagon.
(cnn)


Holy moley. I never woulda thunk it.

Hooray for him. I wish him good luck in his job search.
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.42 seconds on 05/11/2024 at 09:36:07