192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 02:40 am
Just beggin to be nuked, eh?:

Quote:
Iran Holds "Day of Rage"

Hundreds of thousands flooded the streets of Tehran to denounce the United States in the Islamic Republic's "day of rage." Video showed some demonstrators burning American and Israeli flags and chanting "death to America."

"Washington does not dare carry out its military threats against Iran. The Americans know very well that Iran and its allies in the region would retaliate very hard. That will make America face dark days to come," said Ali Akbar Velayati.


It's obviously best to take out these hundreds of thousands of raving maniacs all at once, eh?

Two words: Pre-emptive strike.

Until then, we know that our federal courts are protecting us, at least.
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 02:44 am
@layman,
Quote:
Far-right websites have seized on Ms. Ortega’s conviction as proof that Mr. Trump is right about rampant fraud and efforts by Democrats to steal the November election.

There is, however, at least one flaw in that story: Ms. Ortega was a registered Republican.

“She voted for Mitt Romney over Barack Obama in the 2012 election. In 2014 she voted for our current attorney general, Ken Paxton,” Mr. Birdsall said. “And guess what? He’s the one responsible for prosecuting her.”
Source
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 02:46 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Cool, Walt! Illegal is illegal. 8 years aint enough, really, but, still....

Ken Paxton aint no Democrat. He aint gunna let illegal **** slide just to get votes.
layman
 
  -4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 03:04 am
@layman,
Quote:
Ms. Ortega moved to neighboring Tarrant County and again registered, but this time checked a box affirming that she was not a citizen. When her application was rejected in March 2015, the trial showed, she called election officials and told them that she had previously voted in Dallas County without difficulty.

Told that she could not vote unless she was a citizen, she asked for another application, and returned it with a check in the box affirming citizenship.

“She told the elections office she was a citizen,” he said. “She told everyone else she wasn’t,” including a recorded statement to prosecutors in which she said she was a citizen of Mexico.

Ms. Ortega’s future is bleak. The federal government frowns on giving green cards to felons. “She’ll do eight years in a Texas prison,” Mr. Birdsall said. “And then she’ll be deported, and wake up blinking and scratching in a country she doesn’t know.”


Of course NOBODY ever votes illegally on purpose, right? None of them "know" anything. AFTER she serves 8 years, she gunna be deported anyway. Should have left when she had the chance.

That story brings up another issue, though. Congress is gunna amend immigration and naturalization laws. Being born in the U.S. while your mother is not a citizen will NOT make you a citizen anymore.

So long, senorita.
layman
 
  -4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 03:18 am
@Walter Hinteler,
Now hide and watch the radlibs whine and bitch about this, eh, Walt?

The same one's who spent millions funding a recount trying to make sure every last vote was legit, ya know?

We don't want ANY foreigners deciding our elections, whether russian, mexican, iranian, or whatever. Of course, more than anything, no damn Germans.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 03:31 am
@layman,
That aint the onliest law that's gunna get changed, either. Every 10 years we manage to have a government agent go to every household in the country to take a census.

Next time around, things will be different. Then every census-taker will be deputized by the ICE. They will be told to demand proof of citizenship from everyone. It will save a lot of time. They won't have to interview illegals anymore. They will just hand-cuff them to their house, call in the arrest squad, and move on. It will pay for itself!

Not only in saved time, but also by effecting a forfeiture of illegal houses and selling them at auction. It's gunna be a lucrative business for American investors, too. Everybody wins!

America First, Baby.
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 03:54 am
Quote:
CIA freezes out top Flynn aide
The agency denied a security clearance for a key aide to the National Security Adviser — ratcheting up tensions between Flynn and the intel community.
http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/mike-flynn-nsa-aide-trump-234923
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:04 am
At least the federal courts are protecting Americans from people like this, eh?:

0 Replies
 
gungasnake
 
  -2  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:09 am
http://thefederalistpapers.org/us/breaking-senate-gop-has-enough-of-9th-circuit-puts-forth-bill-to-dismantle?utm_source=FBLC&utm_medium=FB&utm_campaign=LC
0 Replies
 
Walter Hinteler
 
  5  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:15 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Next time around, things will be different. Then every census-taker will be deputized by the ICE. [...]
America First, Baby.
Fine! You really don't need those millions lawful permanent residents, and legal residents on temporary visas. That certainly will boost the tourist business as well - more US-Americans can explore all those beautiful sides which now are blocked by foreign visitors!
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:27 am
This life-long liberal thinks liberals are aiding ISIS. She has a good point.




For some damn reason, she doesn't think they're "caring" people anymore.

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:29 am
Oh goodness
Quote:
Vancouver long has sought a share of Silicon Valley’s magic. With President Trump moving to curb immigration and the U.S. tech industry in open revolt, the friendly, functional Canadian city may finally get its wish.

Tech companies that keep satellite offices in Vancouver, just a two-hour flight from San Francisco, are exploring whether to move more jobs over the border. Immigration lawyers are reporting a steep uptick in inquiries. And a start-up is offering to smooth the way, for $6,000 a person, for foreign-born tech workers worried their U.S. visas may disappear.
WP

0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:39 am

Where the hell is Jeff Gannon when you need him?
Quote:
Following a bombshell report that National Security Adviser Michael Flynn may have violated the Logan Act, President Donald Trump called on reporters only from outlets owned by Rupert Murdoch at a February 10 U.S.-Japan joint press conference, favoring news sources that have been major supporters and receiving no questions about the Flynn report.

Speaking at a press conference with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, Trump took questions from the New York Post’s Daniel Halper and Fox Business’ Blake Burman, both of whom asked about an appeals court decision upholding the suspension of his Muslim ban executive order
MediaMatters
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:43 am
If you read anything today, read this:
Quote:
...I want to start with Trump’s lies. It’s now a commonplace that Trump and his underlings tell whoppers. Fact-checkers have never had it so good. But all politicians lie. Bill Clinton could barely go a day without some shading or parsing of the truth. Richard Nixon was famously tricky. But all the traditional political fibbers nonetheless paid some deference to the truth — even as they were dodging it. They acknowledged a shared reality and bowed to it. They acknowledged the need for a common set of facts in order for a liberal democracy to function at all. Trump’s lies are different. They are direct refutations of reality — and their propagation and repetition is about enforcing his power rather than wriggling out of a political conundrum. They are attacks on the very possibility of a reasoned discourse, the kind of bald-faced lies that authoritarians issue as a way to test loyalty and force their subjects into submission. That first press conference when Sean Spicer was sent out to lie and fulminate to the press about the inauguration crowd reminded me of some Soviet apparatchik having his loyalty tested to see if he could repeat in public what he knew to be false. It was comical, but also faintly chilling.

...One of the great achievements of free society in a stable democracy is that many people, for much of the time, need not think about politics at all. The president of a free country may dominate the news cycle many days — but he is not omnipresent — and because we live under the rule of law, we can afford to turn the news off at times. A free society means being free of those who rule over you — to do the things you care about, your passions, your pastimes, your loves — to exult in that blessed space where politics doesn’t intervene. In that sense, it seems to me, we already live in a country with markedly less freedom than we did a month ago. It’s less like living in a democracy than being a child trapped in a house where there is an abusive and unpredictable father, who will brook no reason, respect no counter-argument, admit no error, and always, always up the ante until catastrophe inevitably strikes. This is what I mean by the idea that we are living through an emergency.
NYMag
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 04:51 am
@blatham,
Some people think the cheese-eaters are paranoid and exaggerating things to the point of fictional hyperbolism.

I don't.

Cheese-eaters SHOULD be afraid.

VERY afraid.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 05:24 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
That story brings up another issue, though. Congress is gunna amend immigration and naturalization laws. Being born in the U.S. while your mother is not a citizen will NOT make you a citizen anymore.

That's written into the Constitution. It would take a Constitutional amendment to change. Very unlikely to succeed.

Especially since it is part of the Fourteenth Amendment, which is beloved by both the Right and the Left.

I'm sure an amendment would be crafted so that it would only remove only that one part of the Fourteenth. But still, I can't imagine that an attempt to remove any part of the Fourteenth Amendment could ever succeed.
oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 05:25 am
@blatham,
blatham wrote:
If you read anything today, read this:

The people that Blatham relies on to do his thinking for him haven't told him this yet, but the Trump Administration is floating a trial balloon about making Sarah Palin our ambassador to Canada.

Mr. Green


Quote:
Trump’s lies are different. They are direct refutations of reality — and their propagation and repetition is about enforcing his power rather than wriggling out of a political conundrum. They are attacks on the very possibility of a reasoned discourse, the kind of bald-faced lies that authoritarians issue as a way to test loyalty and force their subjects into submission.

The lies of the Left are just as egregious as any lie that Mr. Trump has ever told.
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 05:27 am
It's being reported that Trump is about to sign another executive order listing terms and phrases which, if used to describe him, will be prosecuted as a felony. Some of these have already leaked out of this very leak-prone administration. What we know so far:

**** nozzle
twat womble
phlegm monkey
douche 3chins


oralloy
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 05:28 am
@layman,
layman wrote:
Some people think the cheese-eaters are paranoid and exaggerating things to the point of fictional hyperbolism.
I don't.
Cheese-eaters SHOULD be afraid.
VERY afraid.

I just wish they would stop with their noisy tantrums.

Yes, the Left is doomed. Mr. Trump is leading America into the 21st century, and the Left is going to have no part in that.

But maybe they could go sulk quietly for a few years instead of screaming and smashing things all the time.
0 Replies
 
layman
 
  -3  
Sat 11 Feb, 2017 05:50 am
@oralloy,
oralloy wrote:

That's written into the Constitution. It would take a Constitutional amendment to change. Very unlikely to succeed.


You can argue that, but that's not been established as a legal precedent. Quoting from wiki:

Quote:
Birthplace Citizenship is controversial as applied to children born in the United States to non-immigrant parents....

Both Democrats and Republicans have introduced legislation aimed at narrowing the application of the Citizenship Clause. In 1993, Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.) introduced legislation that would limit birthright citizenship to the children of U.S. citizens and legally resident aliens, and similar bills have been introduced by other legislators in every Congress since.

Some legislators, unsure whether such Acts of Congress would survive court challenges, have proposed that the Citizenship Clause be changed through a constitutional amendment...

The most recent judge to weigh in on the issue as to whether a constitutional amendment would be necessary to change the policy is Judge Richard Posner who remarked in a 2003 case that "Congress would not be flouting the Constitution if it amended the Immigration and Nationality Act to put an end to the nonsense."...Posner also wrote, that automatic birthright citizenship is a policy that "Congress should rethink" and that the United States "should not be encouraging foreigners to come to the United States solely to enable them to confer U.S. citizenship on their future children."


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birthright_citizenship_in_the_United_States

My understanding is that Posner is a highly respected constitutional scholar, so.....
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2024 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.77 seconds on 11/16/2024 at 03:47:28