192
   

monitoring Trump and relevant contemporary events

 
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 9 May, 2020 06:51 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I think youve enrolled in the same elocution school as Trump

I think you do not have the integrity to admit what happened to Flynn was wrong and that Schiff lying, knowingly, and his party and the media behind him every step of the way is a serious crime and the biggest threat ever to our Constitution and the republic.

Do you?
farmerman
 
  4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 06:58 pm
@coldjoint,
I do not. Trump fired him for lying to Pence. I think we will find that this is some pre- election dirty trick of which Der Fuhrer is renowned.
farmerman
 
  5  
Sat 9 May, 2020 06:59 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
is a serious crime and the biggest threat ever to our Constitution and the republic.
Now you ven sound like him. I think his entire ploy here is to divert our attention away from the deaths hes been somewhat rsponsible for
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 9 May, 2020 07:01 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I do not. Trump fired him for lying to Pence

Fired is much different than prosecuted. He was railroaded dishonestly and Obama knew all about it. It is out in the open now. Denying it makes you look foolish, but you have been foolish for the last three years.
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 9 May, 2020 07:05 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
Now you ven sound like him. I think his entire ploy here is to divert our attention away from the deaths hes been somewhat rsponsible for

Nope, more projection. The panic is over for anyone with common sense. The media refuses to give this the attention it deserves. Using fearmongering in its place. Trump will get the information out, you can count on that.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 07:40 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I think his entire ploy here is to divert our attention away from the deaths hes been somewhat rsponsible for


At the start of the epidemic, the DNC were still thrashing about enthusiastically with their pointless and groundless impeachment melodrama, so if there's to be any finger-pointing or blame-laying, they share much of that themselves.

farmerman
 
  6  
Sat 9 May, 2020 07:43 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
They are proven facts.
They are not proven, they are merely assertions.
farmerman
 
  5  
Sat 9 May, 2020 07:58 pm
@coldjoint,
Quote:
He was railroaded dishonestly and Obama knew all about it
Alternte facts eh?
Obama told plump not to hire him didnt he???
There was an issue of veracity and trust from the getgo.

Do you get paid from the Kremlin??
Below viewing threshold (view)
farmerman
 
  7  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:06 pm
@Builder,
Quote:
so if there's to be any finger-pointing or blame-laying, they share much of that themselves.
I dont disagree. After all, the Senate "trial" was a sham. We all knew how it would end, But Im just sick of Joints stating that the Senate trial had a "court of Law" imprimatur, it didnt because it was a political exercise. If he was found guilty, all they could do was censure or ask him to lave office. HE COULD REFUSE and that would start another Constitutional crisis (we aint there yet but I think we will approach one when he loses the election)
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:12 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
They are not proven, they are merely assertions.

Wrong the transcripts show there was no "there there". There was no basis to even start an investigation, and that is from the AG. They are under oath testimonies. Are you calling top level Obama officials liars? I am, because they said there was nothing and lied for three years saying there was.

That is the truth, deny it if you wish.
0 Replies
 
bobsal u1553115
 
  4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:27 pm
@farmerman,
"Nothing there." Right, that why they fought so hard to keep from releasing the Mueller Report and why Trump wouldn't go in front of the Impeachment Committee or allow WH personal to testify.
coldjoint
 
  -4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:33 pm
@bobsal u1553115,
Quote:
Trump wouldn't go in front of the Impeachment Committee or allow WH personal to testify.

Only an idiot would have done that. You have just found out the hard way who are the idiots.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:35 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
it didnt because it was a political exercise.

Albert, impeachment is a political exercise.
0 Replies
 
Builder
 
  -2  
Sat 9 May, 2020 08:40 pm
@farmerman,
Quote:
I dont disagree. After all, the Senate "trial" was a sham. We all knew how it would end.


Not Schiff and Pelosi, apparently. Though wasting time and resources, and dodging reality appears to be their game plan.

Four years, and Biden is their man? Seriously?

It's like they want four more years, so they can have another crack at impeachment.
0 Replies
 
blatham
 
  4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 09:03 pm
Quote:
“History is written by the winners,” William Barr, the attorney general, said Thursday when asked how he thought future generations would assess his decision to drop all criminal charges against Michael Flynn, President Trump’s former national security adviser, who had pleaded guilty twice to breaking the law. “So it largely depends on who’s writing the history.”
NYT

The subtext here is that in human affairs there is really no such thing as discernible objective truth. That which will be labeled as truth is merely a function (for the most part) of political power.

If you were searching for some ideological intersection between Trump and Barr, that is it right there. Power is everything and truth is merely what power says it is. Law is what power says it is. Fairness is what power says it is. Morality is what power says it is. The Constitution says what power says it says. The Bible says what power says it says.
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 9 May, 2020 09:05 pm
@blatham,
Quote:

The subtext here is that in human affairs there is really no such thing as discernible objective truth.

Wrong, the transcripts are objective truth. Try reading them. History will take care of itself.
0 Replies
 
coldjoint
 
  -2  
Sat 9 May, 2020 09:12 pm
Quote:
Michael Caputo Releases Receipts, Shows Rep. Eric Swalwell Was Witness Tampering

Twitter time.
Quote:
Good morning all! I’m just having coffee, remembering that 2018 twitter direct message after midnight on a Saturday night from a tipsy Congressman contacting me, a represented party, in clear violation of House Ethics rules. pic.twitter.com/mjhZnE9JVo

— Michael R. Caputo (@MichaelRCaputo) May 9, 2020

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EXlUCvfXgAAcG1v?format=jpg&name=small
The Democrats have no ethics.
https://www.redstate.com/bonchie/2020/05/09/michael-caputo-reveals-witness-tampering-perpetrated-eric-swalwell/?utm_source=63red.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=63red
0 Replies
 
ehBeth
 
  4  
Sat 9 May, 2020 09:13 pm
So. What is Judge Sullivan going to do?
coldjoint
 
  -3  
Sat 9 May, 2020 09:15 pm
@ehBeth,
Quote:
So. What is Judge Sullivan going to do?

Nothing, there is no case.
0 Replies
 
 

Related Topics

Obama '08? - Discussion by sozobe
Let's get rid of the Electoral College - Discussion by Robert Gentel
McCain's VP: - Discussion by Cycloptichorn
Food Stamp Turkeys - Discussion by H2O MAN
The 2008 Democrat Convention - Discussion by Lash
McCain is blowing his election chances. - Discussion by McGentrix
Snowdon is a dummy - Discussion by cicerone imposter
TEA PARTY TO AMERICA: NOW WHAT?! - Discussion by farmerman
 
Copyright © 2025 MadLab, LLC :: Terms of Service :: Privacy Policy :: Page generated in 0.47 seconds on 01/16/2025 at 04:54:36